Customer Reviews


4 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favourable review
The most helpful critical review


18 of 20 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Could Do Better
The phase that frequently appeared on my school reports, could equally well be applied to Canada. Repeatedly told that we don't matter and nobody listens to us, our actions indicate that we believe it. There is nothing that the bully to the south of us would like less than Ned Flanders as a neighbour. Yet where we could be a constant example of reasonableness and ethical...
Published on Sep 29 2007 by Peter R. Smith

versus
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Holding the Bully's Coat
Has some interesting information in it. But the writer has more problem with who is doing
it then what they are doing. One gets the idea that if the other party was doing it, things
would be just fine.
Published on Sep 11 2009 by Rocky Young


Most Helpful First | Newest First

18 of 20 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Could Do Better, Sep 29 2007
By 
Peter R. Smith (Ontario, Canada) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the U.S. Empire (Hardcover)
The phase that frequently appeared on my school reports, could equally well be applied to Canada. Repeatedly told that we don't matter and nobody listens to us, our actions indicate that we believe it. There is nothing that the bully to the south of us would like less than Ned Flanders as a neighbour. Yet where we could be a constant example of reasonableness and ethical behaviour, author Linda McQuaig illustrates how, even when we haven't joined in the bullying directly, we have held his coat while he did it. Under the guise of integration and cooperation etc. we are losing our identity in a quagmire of moral cowardice. We are not moderating American behaviour, we are condoning it. Time to stand on our own and call it like we see it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


31 of 37 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Do your own homework. Read Mcquaig., Aug 9 2007
This review is from: Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the U.S. Empire (Hardcover)
Read for yourself. It is a good thing that books are published that question or criticize the 'official story', aka the CNN/FOX spun version of reality, where "humanitarian aid" means the bombing of civilians, where "spreading democracy" means illegal occupation. You're not being "anti-american" if you don't want to follow America into bogus wars of occupation and invasion, like the current "war on terror". Anti-american twaddle? Mcquaig points out specifically that she is not anti-american, but "anti-american-exceptionalist"-- why should the US have special rights, like the ability to pursue their own nuclear program while they go around seeing that other nations don't pursue theirs? That's just one example of how the american-exceptionalism. The list goes on, and on.

Why should Canadians be ashamed to want to be an internationally concerned and responsible country, instead of following in America's agressive-defensive ways? It is often said that we need the US to protect us, but I'd say that US foreign policy in the middle-east, and any Canadian affiliation with it, if anything, has made us a more desireable target of foreign attack.

Canadians: read Linda Mcquaig and Michel Chossudovsky. Don't worry about being politically-correct. The media shouts us down as "anti-american" if we don't support an illegal, destructive, US-led war. Canadian media calls us "unsupportive of our troops" if we don't agree with Canadian policy in the middle-east. Why should we, as Canadians, be ashamed to read this material (especially Canadians from Virginia ;) )? We shouldn't be. Read it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 3 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Holding the Bully's Coat, Sep 11 2009
By 
Rocky Young (Canada) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the U.S. Empire (Hardcover)
Has some interesting information in it. But the writer has more problem with who is doing
it then what they are doing. One gets the idea that if the other party was doing it, things
would be just fine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 85 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars What a load of rubbish, Aug 8 2007
This review is from: Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the U.S. Empire (Hardcover)
This is the kind of anti-American twaddle that, amazingly, can still get published. Canada, like most of NATO, is involved in Afghanistan, which benefits the whole world. As hard as it is for many Canadians, this is the right thing to do - unless you're pro-Taliban. Don't confuse the mess in Iraq with Afghanistan, they are apples and oranges. Canada benefits greatly from its relationship with the U.S.; everything from trade to security. Just as an example, if control of the Artic Ocean region every really gets contentious with Putin's Russia, who do you think Canada will turn to for assistance. For that matter, Canada doesn't have the armed forces or resources to ever defend itself. The U.S. shoulders a huge burden for us. This kind of book is just ignorant anti-Americanism. It is beneath our dignity as Canadians to fall for this rubbish.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the U.S. Empire
Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the U.S. Empire by Linda McQuaig (Hardcover - Mar 22 2007)
Used & New from: CDN$ 0.98
Add to wishlist See buying options