Customer Reviews

Little Children

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

I have to say that while in some ways it was a disturbing story; it was also very touching in a lot of ways. The first thing one will notice about the film will be the mood set via the lighting, and then of course the narrator Will Lyman, who is often used in documentaries but at times can be annoying. As a viewer you are immediately drawn into this storybook like atmosphere in a non-traditional storybook sort of setting and the quirkiness and underlying humor keeps you hooked.

I also felt these actors had such depth and character, either you could relate or want to speak too and have some sort of relationship with. "Little Children" overflows with meaningful lives. You will come to fine out everyone struggles in this slice of modern suburbia. Sarah (Kate Winslett) is a housewife and a mother who has lost a little something in her life, passion, while her husband (Gregg Edelman) is messing around on the internet; she meets the "prom king" of the block, Brad, and has a deep passionate affair with him. But there is a problem, Brad (Patrick Wilson) is also married with a child as well, but their affair and love is too strong to ignore when they realize that they are what were missing in each other's lives, or are they just a fantasy they needed to fulfill? There is another character in this film named Ronnie (Jackie Earle Haley), who had a horrible reputation after exposing himself to a minor and is snubbed by the committee, but the only love of his life is his mother (incredibly talented Phyllis Somerville) who is constantly trying to get an ex cop harasser (Noah Emmerich) off her son's back.

This film had some terrific performances; I was completely convinced by everyone, particularly Kate Winslet and Patrick Wilson, who made a wonderful couple. The support cast, though great, didn't have a lot to work with, particularly Jennifer Connelly, as Brads wife, who did well with what she had. The children were effective and very cute. I was also very impressed by the brave perspective director Todd Field took towards sexual deviants who have served their time, showing that they are unduly victimized for almost the rest of their existence. In fact, the storyline between Ronnie and Larry, and the small offshoots, were the best part of the film, and very well done.

"Little Children" is an incredibly touching film; the ending was so beautiful and really brought true closure to the story. This is one of the best recent American films of our time, I would highly recommend it.

Entertaining look at life in the burbs and the madness that can ensue from people who seemingly get tired of the mundane. Story centres around two married individuals, one a stay-at home dad, the other a bored housewife (Kate Winslet) married to a comotose rich guy. The film also focuses on other fascinating characters and storylines that will all intertwine with another to give us a dramatic finale. As far as modern dramas go, this is one of the best I've seen in quite some time.

The title of "Little Children" is obviously ironic since the young adults who make up the film's main characters are clearly being characterized as such by novelist Tom Perrotta. The author's judgments are of such importance to the telling ot the tale that director Todd Field, who did the screenplay with Perrotta, uses a narrator (Will Lyman, narrator of numerous PBS "NOVA" and "Frontline") to both express the inner thoughts of silent characters and to pass additional judgments. I was not especially enamored of this approach, which substitutes telling for showing at several points, but the touches of sardonic wit eventually won me over. However, the same cannot be said for most of the characters, which is actually a key part of the story.

Sarah Pierce (Kate Winslet) takes her daughter to the local suburban playground each day, where she listens to the gossip of the other young mothers, who have two primary topics. The first is the stay-at-home dad, Brad Adamson (Patrick Wilson), who has recently returned after a mysterious absence to show up at the playground with his young son. They call him the "Prom King," and when one of them bets Sarah $5 that she cannot gets the guy's phone number, Sarah gets a lot more than that. The second omnipresent topic is the release from prison of a pedophile, Ronnie J. McGorvey (Jackie Earle Haley), who has moved into the neighborhood to live with his mother, May (Phyllis Somerville). Ronnie exposed himself to a young girl and ex-cop Larry Hedges (Noah Emmerich) has taken it upon himself to do more than just put up posters all over town warning parents about the sexual predator living in the neighborhood.

It is the reaction of the neighbors to Ronnie that first clues us in that this slice of suburbia is just another Peyton Place and that these characters are all hypocrites, because the hysterical reaction strikes me as just such overkill. If this is what they do to somebody who exposes himself, then you have to wonder what they would consider appropriate for someone guilty of more wretched molestation. When Ronnie finally appears there is clearly evidence that he has not changed, just as everybody fears, but there is also a scene that I think makes it equally clear Ronnie wants to be seen and not to touch. This only serves to reinforce the idea that these other characters should not be throwing stones, let alone judging others, and that this collision of characters is not going to end well.

Brad is married to Kathy (Jennifer Connelly), who is preoccupied with her career as a documentary film making and blithely unaware of what she is doing to her husband by suggesting he does not really "need" his magazine subscriptions. Meanwhile, Sarah's husband, Richard (Gregg Edelman), has become smitten with an Internet sex site. With their spouses adding to the inevitability of their affair, Brad and Sarah attempt to fill up the voids in their lives, while their neighbors continue to pass judgment on each other. Mary Ann (Mary B. McCann) is clearly the most judgmental of the playground mothers, although her character is apparently not as prominent as she is in the novel. What is important is that the characters are so busy passing judgments on each other they remain oblivious to their own failings until they are forcibly confronted by them.

Winslet and Haley were Oscar nominated for their roles, but their fine performances do not stand out notably so in this ensemble piece, where I found Sommerville and Emmerich to be equally strong. In the wake of the success of "Pulp Fiction" there were a whole slew of movies that scrambled up their chronological narratives in imitations of Quentin Tarrantino's film. It seems that the Oscar winning film "Crash" is becoming a similar source of emulation with all of these films that offer a fateful collision of characters with their varying degrees of separation (Not that "Crash" was the first film to do this sort of thing but rather than it has become the cinematic reference point for that particular approach). I wondered how "Babel" would have done at the Academy Awards if it did not seem so "Crash"-like, and was surprised by the final reel to discover that "Little Children" was even more like Paul Haggis's film. You regard for this similarity might be a stronger indicator of your predisposition for or against this particular film.

However, I also found myself being remind of "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan." I have always wondered why the super-intelligent Khan would start quoting Ahab from "Moby Dick," seemingly embracing the whole idea of self-destructive obsession. In "Little Children" Sarah sits in on a neighborhood book club that has read "Madame Bovary," and finds herself identifying with Emma's plight, even though the group has explicitly talked about the character's suicide. Maybe if she had finished her dissertation she would know better, but Sarah is obviously trying to ignore the obvious and painful parallels. I can understand wanting to be with Emma Bovary (e.g., Woody Allen's "The Kugelmass Episode"), or discovering that your situation is precariously similar (e.g., Kate Chopin's "The Awakening"), but actively embracing such a fate is quite disconcerting. That is probably why I found the resolution of this 2006 film to be somewhat refreshing in that it did not play out exactly as anticipated.

Little Children is the latest example of movies that demonize men. The overall theme of the movie is castration, symbolically and literally.
Parallel stories which later merge are developed involving the various characters.
Much discussion among some suburban housewives is about castrating a sexual offender who has exposed himself to a child, has served his time and is released back into the community. He looks like what he is - the cartoon-like cliche classic pervert.The man is released into the custody of his aging mother, who dotes on him as though he were a child, and which attention is probably what drove him to commit his offence in the first place, because emotionally he has never progressed beyond childhood and imagines himself and the objects of his affection as playmates. Even the date that he's forced into by his mother is a train-wreck - he can't stop looking at kids, and he ends up disgusting his date by his gross behaviour. This man visits the local swimming pool on a busy summer day, and the characterization of him as the monster in the pool, rather like the shark in 'Jaws', and the subsequent clearing of the pool by the panic-stricken parents, is a masterpiece of dark humour.
The second set of characters is the briefcase totin' successful hard working wife and her stay-at-home emasculated child-like husband who pretends to be studying for his bar exams but really doesn't want to. He has to be constantly prodded to study, as someone would prod a child to do his homework. He later meets and forms a buddy relationship with an ex-cop who introduces him to a pick-up weekly football game that allows him to re-assert his long-lost masculinity. This husband is the object of interest of the previously mentioned local housewives in his visits to a local park, where he takes his little boy for his daily outing, and one of the housewives accepts a dare to talk to him and get his phone number. The two continue to meet in the park while ostensibly taking their children on their daily outing. A humorous scene takes place when the daughter of the mother wants to go to the bathroom; the mother tells her to just 'pee in the pool', but the child insists on going to the bathroom, thereby demonstrating that this young child is more socially mature than her mother. Eventually, a child-like extra-marital romance develops between the man and the woman, and an affair follows. Later, they agree to 'run away from home'.
The woman who is the object of the husband's affection is married to a hard-working marketing guy who seems to be hooked on an internet porn site to the degree that he doesn't seem to have any time for his wife - he's so involved in his on-line peep-show relationship. This provides the motivation for the wife to seek companionship elsewhere, after she discovers him in a rather embarrassing situation while he is exploring his on-line relationship to the fullest extent possible.
The final major character is the ex-cop who becomes totally obsessed with the perv who has been released into the community. The reason he's an ex-cop is because he over-reacted and unneccessarily killed an unarmed young man in the line of duty. This ex-cop is another cartoon characterization of a red-neck, brutish, vulgar, gun-toting suburbanite tough guy that we all love to hate, especially because he's probably just the way all men would be if they haven't been emasculated. He's the schoolyard bully grown up.
In the end, there's tragedy, the ex-cop makes peace with the perv, everone grows up a little, and life goes on.
Four stars just because it's so absorbing.