Customer Reviews

Breaker Morant

5 star:		(37)
4 star:		(7)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(3)

 

 

Based on a real life incident of Australian soldiers charged with murder --
for political reasons-- during the Boer war.

Echoes of Kubrick's "Paths of Glory", but the morality here is more grey. These men have indeed
done awful things, but only as part of a war full of awful things. Thus, while your heart is with the
protagonists, there are moments you question them almost as much as the Kangaroo court they
face.

The acting is excellent throughout, and what was originally a play has been opened up just enough
so as not to feel stagey, without feeling forced.

Some of the moral complexities could have been explored with more depth, and there is a slightly
disturbing suggestion of making "I was just following orders" a viable defense for war atrocities,
but I'd much rather question an intelligent, challenging picture"s point of view, then not be
challenged at all.

This is a film about a trial of three Australians who were accussed of shooting Boer prisoners and also the murder of a minister. The trial is interspersed with flashback scenes of the actual conflict.
In short the Boers after some initial successes were defeated by the more numerous British forces. They however did not accept defeat and mounted groups of Boer farmers continued to fight a guerilla war.

The Boer war was notable for a number of things one being the invention of concentration camps. The British locked up the wives and children of the Boers so that they could not be supplied while carrying out raids. Some 20,000 women and children are said to have died in the camps.

This film centres on some Australian troops who followed orders to shoot captured Boer commandoes. One of them Breaker Morant was a noted poet of the time who in Australia had contributed to the Bullutein Magazine for some time. He volunteered with an Australian unit to fight in the war.

The film is largely about the hypcrosy of the British High Command who were willing to order the killing of prisoners and then to deny it when their actions in South Africa were causing a stink. Some territorials were put on trial to play the role of sacraficial victims.

The problem with most Australian films is that they have poor scripts. Great photography and composition is no substitute for a tight script. The virtue of this film is that it is one of the best scripted Australian films released. It is also noteworthy as a film which is critcal of the Imperial tradition. The cast is very good with Edward Woodwood, Brian Brown and Jack Thompson. One of the better Australian films made.

What a wonderfully made movie. A great period piece. Spectacular performances through out make you feel like you are right there in the middle of the action. This movie makes you think that killing might be justified and then maybe not? Once again the Stuffy British attitude during this period is brought to task and exposed as the reason for many deaths and injustices. Ultimately a stimulating ride well worth the 2 hours. Bryan Brown and Edward Woodward were born for these roles. This movie helped launch almost everyone involved into even bigger productions.

I could not get this DVD to play in any of my home machines. "Uncompatible" or "unreadable" is all I could get.
When I tried on a very old DVD player I was able to play the movie but the quality really sucked.

This movie by Australian director Bruce Beresford is brilliant. It's based on a real incident which occurred during the Boer War in South Africa.

The plot revolves around a group of British and Australian officers serving in a highly mobile anti-guerrilla cavalry unit, called the Bushveldt Carbineers. After the Carbineers are ambushed by a force of Boers, who capture, kill and mutilate the Carbineers' commanding officer, the unit captures some Boers and find some of them wearing British uniform tunics taken from dead Carbineers. Because the Boer prisoners are wearing items of British uniform, the officer in charge, the Breaker Morant of the title, orders the summary field execution of the Boer prisoners.

Morant and two other officers subsequently face a court martial on charges of murder. The film presents them as scapegoats who believed they were acting under orders to take no Boer prisoners but who are sacrificed to political expediency by a British High Command, under Lord Kitchener, which wants to mollify German and Dutch public opinion, which unequivocally supports the Boers.

This movie raises issues which are still relevant today.

Great movie - highly recommended.

One point about the Amazon headers though. The headers don't mention the lead actors, Edward Woodward and Brian Brown. Instead they list some supporting actors. That's very confusing.
I had to look at the graphic image of the DVD cover to see the names Edward Woodward and Brian Brown and confirm to myself that this was the Breaker Morant movie from the early 1980s and not a remake. Amazon staff, you might want to correct that problem.

I remember seeing this riveting film with my father in Westbury, LI, roughly after the period (due to shifting economics) cinemas became duplex. True, "Breaker Morant" is a smaller-scale film in one sense, but it is much greater than many of "epic" dimensions. The performances are uniformly (no pun intended) outstanding, Mr. Beresford's direction so skillfull it is arguably the finest filmed adaptation of a stage play I've ever seen. (In fact, in my first lapse of critical acuity, I didn't discover this until long afterwards!)

The films begins as a fact-based courtroom drama yet ends with a truly rare, poignant (not mawkish) poeticism. The script is fully realized: for example, it shows the title character as a refined, cultured man of the world. Late in the story, when in prison and offered the opportunity to escape, a visitor says: "You can see the world." So powerful is the portrayal of Morant, his devastatingly simple reply was interpreted prima facie by my accursed literal mind! (Hence, my second, and more serious critical lapse.) Australia should be proud of this contribution to world cinema, for it is a great, rara avis: a memorable film.

This is quite simply one of the best films I have seen. Every person I have recommended this film to has said the same, and every person who has asked me what are the best films I have seen ( I am a true student and fan of film )- I immediately answer "Breaker Morant" either first or second. It brings the British Empire to it`s knees, at least ethically. Interestingly, some scholars have done research in the last decade or so and think that Morant was a cold-blooded killer ( doubtful, I think ). Director Beresford himself, when presented with this evidence said the same.

As far as this film is concerned- this "evidence" doesn`t detract from the greatness of " Breaker Morant" at all.(...)

Along with Kubrick's Paths of Glory, this film ranks tops among its genre. During the Boer wars in Austrailia, Morant and his associates are prisoners to be executed for something stupid. While in custody, the Boers attack and Morant and his men are given rifles and fight valiently to stave off the attack. What does this act of bravery earn them! The answer is a big resounding nothing. Like the previously mentioned movie, it shows you how egos in the military get in the way of justice! Great acting and directing along with a story that is compelling to the last scene!

This film addresses (and won the Australian "Oscar" for best film over 20 years ago) a vexing, eternal question in the history of humankind and human conflict. Military discipline is invoked to control what would otherwise become a savage horde. Men (and now women) are taught to kill in the name of some identity (national, religious, subversive, for example).

When to the combatants go "too far" in engaging their minds to the task before them? Protecting their own, perhaps putting the enemy at some risk (psychological or physical) doing so? Saving lives. Is war never acceptable as a form of handling conflict, and what should be the consequences of going "out of bounds?" Where is the rulebook? Who does it apply to? This question is as fresh today as at the near-end of the Boer War, a hundred years ago and on the other side of the world, but not further from the questions it raises than nightly news reports on NBC, CBS, ABC, and other media that "report."

I chance upon this film during a late night (or should I say early morning) showing about five years after its release, and have considered it one of my top ten films of all time. It is engaging, the script is excellent, the portrayals of these actual soldiers and their superiors (including Lord Kitchener) during what no one knew then were the waning days of the British Empire, the soundtrack, all would be worthy of "Oscar" nominations even in the Politically Correct climate today.

We see south African blacks treated as nonexistent, the pride of "colonials" as part of the Empire, the arrogance of "true Britons"--all with counterparts in every conflict.

A highly political "court martial" is held for three Australians serving in the Bushveldt Carbineers--a unit using recently developed "commando" techniques. It is a new word applied to war, and something quite different from the Napoleonic tactics seen not only at the entrance of the 19th century, but repeated again and again in armed conflicts throughout.

These three men applied their intelligence and their compassion (for the death of their commanding officer) to the reduction of casualties, and psychological (propaganda) techniques aimed at the Boers, Dutch colonials living in South Africa.

It was a highly political occurence...after all, the Kaiser (Emperor) of Germany, recently united and no doubt ready to enter a "real" conflict, was the late Queen Victoria's grandson!!! If three Australian "colonials" were to be sacrificed in that pursuit, what of it? With stiff upper lips (camouflaged with mustaches for the most part), we see this tragedy laid out in the most "civilized manner" possible.
You will have strong feelings for and about the men involved.

The United States of America appears to be the last land-occupying miltary superpower (does the sun set on the "American Empire"?). Given the paradoxes and tactical problems encountered in dozens of "humanitarian" and "military" conflicts following the first Gulf War, the lessons of "Breaker Morant" are no less compelling than in any other time in the history of warfare. In fact, this drama makes draws one to surmise that many "military tribunal" concoctions--in legal language, "off point." Thankfully, the DVD edition of this classic is crisp, compelling, and produced to the highest standards. I recommend purchasing it--you will watch it more than once!

Harry 'Breaker' Morant, was an immigrant Australian who served in the Boer war (1900-1903), where Dutch/German Boers wanted independence from England. This was intolerable to the British Empire at the time and Lord Kitchener despatched the army to put down this 'revolt'.

Empire troops were drafted in to help, among them Australians from the new nation. The Boers were waging early guerrilla-style warfare, picking off English troops before melting away and Britain was steadily losing the war.

Lord Kitchener decided to engage troops of the Australian 'Bushveldt Carbineers', among them Harry 'Breaker' Morant, his superior officer and future brother in law Captain Hunt, as well as fellow soldiers Handcock and Witton to adopt the same guerrilla tactics. Although they (somewhat conveniently) received no written orders, it was 'made patently clear' they were to take no prisoners, and to shoot anyone wearing stolen British uniform.

After their well-liked Captain hunt was captured after an ambush and his body later found horribly mutilated, Morant and others found the perpetrators and vowing vengeance, carried out their orders. Several of the Boer soldiers were subsequently executed along with a collaborating German missionary.

With Germany possibly about to enter the war, Britain needed heads on a plate and three 'expendable colonials' were found who fitted the bill.

The compelling courtroom drama shows how the defendants (innocent or otherwise) were manoeuvred towards a guilty verdict for political expediency and are mere pawns in a far greater drama. In an age where failure to obey any orders, written or otherwise, in the British army was mutiny punishable by firing squad, our three defendants are damned if they do carry out orders and damned if they don't.

A compelling look at the often blurry nature of war, it's hardening effect on human attitudes and how power sometimes corrupts justice. Whether guilty or not, these men still deserved a fair trial and this powerful film conveys that well.