Customer Reviews

Life of Pi / L'histoire de Pi (Bilingual) [Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy]

5 star:		(19)
4 star:		(7)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

It's been four years since Slumdog Millionaire took home eight Oscars. I found myself thinking of that movie because Life of Pi opens in India and the cast is predominantly comprised of Indian actors. Like Slumdog Millionaire, the movie uses several actors to portray the main character at different ages. In fact, the older Pi is played by Irrfan Khan, who appears in both movies.

The story is framed with the older Pi relating his story to a writer. We learn that Pi's father owned a zoo, and his mother worked there as a botanist. His father is fond of giving Pi advice, and one memorable lesson involves a demonstration of how dangerous tigers can be, and that they should not be treated like a pet or a friend.

Pi is shown at four different ages, but the bulk of the story shows Pi as a young man, so Suraj Sharma receives the most screen time. Like Cast Away and 127 Hours, the movie relies on one actor holding our attention, and Sharma does a wonderful job of doing just that. It's his first role and he had to show a vast range of emotions in order for everything to work.

The first part of the movie shows Pi's life as a young boy. We see him go to school, and ultimately fall in love. But his life (and the story) is shaken up when his mother and father inform him that they have decided to move the family to Canada. Along with some of the animals, they set sail for their new home. If you have seen the trailer, or even the poster for this movie, it's not a spoiler to reveal that Pi ends up in a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. I imagine that's quite a selling point, as a lot of people would wonder how such a relationship could possibly work.

Director Ang Lee overcomes the limitations of such an enclosed setting in several spectacular ways. It's fascinating to see how Pi tries to survive, as well as co-existing with a dangerous carnivore. The visual aspects of the movie are of the highest quality, and I would be shocked if the movie wasn't nominated in several technical categories. The tiger is convincing, but the visual effects also shine when we are shown some of the things that can happen at sea.

I think Life of Pi is a movie that should be experienced without knowing too much of the story beforehand, so I am not going to reveal anything more about the plot. Although I will mention that the ending is open-ended and leaves you guessing about what really happened out on the ocean.

Religion is an ever-present theme. The movie will ask you to think about why the events in our lives happen, and whether they are random or part of God's plan. But more than one religion is mentioned, and it's not done in an overbearing way.

The script is well-written, and is a big reason why the story works. There is quite a bit of humor, but it's smart and feels natural.

I'm not sure how many movies I have seen this year, but this is one of the best. The story feels fresh and unusual, and some of it is profound and moving. I should also say that a few of the animals are hurt or even killed, so be warned if you are sensitive to such things. That said, you would see more brutality on a nature documentary like Planet Earth.

Life of Pi grabbed my attention early and held it for two hours. It's more than special effects, with the screenplay and acting both standing out. I highly recommend it.

Overall score 4.5/5

Ang Lee's movie version of "Life of Pi" is an extraordinary achievement. Like "The Lord of the Rings" or "The Road", two very different movies made from overwhelmingly well-lauded books, Ang Lee's "Life of Pi" flies in the face of those who at one time might have said that "it couldn't be done, and if it was done, it wouldn't be done well". Lee accomplishes not only a fine and sensitive adaption of Yann Martel's now classic novel, he has fashioned a work of art that stands rock-solidly on it's own merits of cinematic mastery. For the movie exists as a profound statement affirming the indomitability of the human spirit, expressed in an artistic form that is stunningly beautiful, brilliantly edited, meticulously performed, almost metaphysically imagined and very deeply affecting. Both times I saw this in theatres I went away profoundly moved and highly stimulated intellectually, for "Life of Pi" is not JUST the story of an Indian boy in a lifeboat with a tiger named Richard Parker, a Zebra, a Hyena and an Orangutan called "Orange Juice". It is a daring and unflinching look at questions that today we dare not talk about, or are actually embarrassed to talk about - those mostly being around the question of the existence of God ( or Gods ) and whether Reason triumphs over Faith. ( As if one must exist without the other! ). Martel's multi-layered narrative that presents a story and then questions that story digs far more deeply into some big questions than a cursory or reactionary judgement of it might suggest. Lee makes sure that all those levels are clearly discernible for those with the courage to look and see. This is a film that will move you very deeply and have you thinking for many days afterward.

Of course the story does not take place entirely on the lifeboat, even though it is the main body of the piece. It begins in Pondicherry, a one time French colonial town on the southeast coast of India, in Tamil Nadu state. As the film opens to bucolic shots of birds and animals in a very Eden-like setting we begin to hear a narrator, who turns out to be the older Pi ( Irrfan Khan ), many years later, recounting his life as a child in the town to a young writer sent to interview him. It is idyllic and untroubled and Pi himself recounts the rather eccentric story of how he got his unusual name. His father, a stark and ultra-rational man of science and reason, thinking himself a member of the "New India", has withdrawn from his traditional Hindu faith in favour of Reason and Science. He is somewhat exasperated with his precocious son Pi, who seems to ignore his father's remonstrations and outright rantings against his son's all-consuming need to explore all the religions his life exposes him too - Hinduism, Islam and Christianity. Pi sees no reason why he can't be an adherent of all of them simultaneously. He seems lost in his dreamy ways and has one foot in this world and the other in a somewhat more metaphysical plane. He seems tied to this world by a very thin thread, but yet, the naive, "irrational" boy may yet be on to something.

Pi's innocence, and even outright dangerous naivete, comes to a head when he seeks to hand feed the Bengal Tiger named Richard Parker that is the feature of his father's landmark zoo. Named so because of a clerical error, Richard Parker comes hair-raisingly close to the boy who is holding out a large piece of raw meat through the bars of the big cat's enclosure. Pi believes that all "animals have souls, I have seen it in their eyes" and he wants to reach Richard Parker's. The boy is rescued by his enraged father at the last second just before the tiger pounces. The father then subjects Pi and the rest of the family to an object lesson on the brute, instinct of animals in order to shock the boy into a realization that is important to his survival. It is amazing how frightened a 450 pound Bengal Tiger is of Pi's father. The incident both wakes Pi up, but it also drives some of his convictions even deeper. This, in turn sets up the precedents for the events of the main body of the story.

Not wanting to include any spoilers in this review I will say that the family has to leave India with the animals and head to Canada via the Pacific Ocean on a gigantic Japanese freighter. A tragedy strikes and Pi by chance ends up surviving by ending up in an ocean lifeboat with what he thinks is his sole companion, a zebra who broke it's leg diving into the boat in order to save itself. As his boat boat is tossed on the waves of the stormy, roiling Pacific Pi sees the figure of someone else struggling in the water, trying to get to the boat. Pi extends an oar only find out it is none other than Richard Parker, the tiger, and it is too late before the big cat is literally tossed into the boat by the gigantic waves.

What follows is extraordinary. Pi's dreamy life is ripped away from him but he still manages to find meaning in his situation - trapped on a lifeboat with a helpless zebra and a Bengal tiger. The character of Pi is shown at 3 stages of his life, as a small boy, as a middle-aged man, but mostly as the young man in the boat. Suraj Sharma, in his brilliant first role, delivers an astoundingly realistic and deeply affecting performance. It is a solo performance upon which the entire sympathy and believability of the story relies and he pulls off a completely convincing range of emotions with perfect aplomb. Things happen and the animals do what animals will do, much to Pi's dismay and danger. He nevertheless works out ways to stay tethered to the boat, by building an attached raft out of supplies. Now the long, complex, harrowing and very moving relationship between Pi and Richard Parker begins. The tiger is a tiger and behaves no less than one. Pi, however recognizes that in order to stay alive he has to build a relationship of sorts with the cat and keep the beast from going after him for food. It is NOT easy. Pi's spirit is resolute and he keeps himself busy with the survival manual and feeding Richard Parker, who is not at all pleased with Pi's presence.

What might seem a monotonous prospect, a boy on a lifeboat, lost on the Pacific Ocean, becomes a riveting story both magical and brutal. This long segment is where Lee's cinematographic vision takes full flight. The Pacific, at one point, becomes eerily flat in a dead calm that stretches to infinity. Lee often shoots the boat from very high above, looking straight down on it from a good 50 - 60 feet above it. With the water absolutely motionless it becomes a flawless mirror of the sky and Pi's boat and raft appear to be floating upside down ( or, 'downside up' ) in an infinity of orange and yellow clouds. Reality's defined "ups" and "downs" are discarded and we begin to see that as a metaphor for Pi's mental state as he spends days, weeks, months adrift on the ocean. Metaphors abound. Later Pi begins to work on subduing the tiger's wildness by using the animal's sea-sickness against it. To a degree Pi is able to re-inhabit the boat after this and he and Richard Parker begin a pas de deux, an olympian struggle of souls, that leads to a form of 'truce' between them. When Pi saves Richard Parker's life when it would have been in his best interest to kill the tiger or let it die, things change. It is one of the most powerful moments in the entire film, the full-circle realization of Pi's childhood conviction that "animals have souls - I have seen it in their eyes". Pi realizes that he actually needs the tiger, that it gives him purpose and reason to live. His powerful and dangerous presence keeps Pi focused and drives his will to live. Richard Parker also becomes resigned to his tormentor and they keep their respective, and respectful, distances. From here the story gently, subtly crosses the line into more metaphysical territory.

Like the cloud scene above there is another such event that follows in the uneasy relationship that Pi and Richard Parker have and it occurs at night. It is the deep, oceanically profound still point, the HEART, the most inconceivably mystical part of the film. Pi awakens to see Richard Parker with his back to him quietly staring out to sea. The moon is out and the water is lit with phospherescent plankton and jellyfish. The air and the water are calm. Pi asks Richard Parker, "what are you looking at? what do you see? tell me". The tiger is still for moment then turns its head to the side, looking over the boat into the water. Pi turns his head to see and the deep becomes alive with living phosphorescence and swimming forms. As he continues to look the images become more magical and Pi sees visions of many things, including his mother who appears more as a goddess in this amazing sequence. Another shot from very high above, looking down at Pi and Richard Parker looking into the depths of the ocean with the cosmos above them also reflected in the water, takes us now into the great Universal. Pi and Richard Parker, in their lifeboat, look like a constellation in the firmament. Pi snaps out of his vision only to see that the tiger has turned completely around to face him but is perfectly still, yet looking at him with extreme interest. Pi looks back at Richard Parker quietly and the two seem to see into each other like never before. Is he finally vindicated here, having believed as a child that his human soul could connect with an animal soul? Is Richard Parker thinking of eating Pi, or, is this the final moment when the human boy and the Bengal tiger share in a vision of eternity, something beyond their individualities and natures and realize their individual selves as expressions of one life? For me, it is the most profound moment of the entire film.

The story continues a bit more, sealing and strengthening, after that vision, the relationship between Pi and Richard Parker. It begins to get fantastic and Pi himself states in his journal that he isn't sure if his grip on reality is all that strong now. Emaciated, dehydrated, starving, the two are at the very limits of their existence. With the coming of a final mid-ocean storm, Pi and his friend are reduced to almost nothing, barely hanging on to life itself. You wonder how much more the two can take. As the violent storm rips away food supplies, life preservers and all that has kept them alive Pi finally surrenders to God. With nothing left to lose and Richard Parker being violently thrown about inside the boat by crashing waves, Pi feels that God has finally come to them... and he is ready.

When he is rescued, the company that owned the freighter desparately try to get Pi's eye witness account of the sinking and want his story - the story he has been telling to the young writer who's been sent by his uncle, the story of he and Richard Parker. At this point both the freighter company people and the befuddled writer begin to question the older Pi's story. Pi recounts how the freighter people were getting quite angry with his story and asked him to give them reality. Reality? Pi asks. He then bitterly launches into another version that speaks of people in the lifeboat, not animals, each person taking the place of the animals of his first version. Pi then almost angrily, hopelessly recounts a tale of such unimaginable horror - of murder, starvation and worse, all in a few short minutes. We have never seen him like this - jaded, wounded, and sharply bitter. It is shocking. Is he now telling the truth or is he so exasperated with his interrogators' incredulity that he spitefully whips up a "reasonable" version to suit their lower level of understanding? We are left with the question - which one is the metaphor for the other? Which one is the truth? Present day Pi asks the now completely confused writer sent to get his story, "which one do you prefer?" You never really know which version is the truth. The easier one to believe is the version of human beings doing unspeakable things to survive, behaving like 'animals', having lost their so-called reason - the reason so vehemently trumpeted by Pi's utterly rational father. When faced with events that strip the soul down to it's core, can we still hang on to the illusion of reason? In "the one with the tiger" there is something deeply significant that goes down deep in many layers and redeems the soul. Which kind of story do we therefore, live by? And when it comes to "God", which do we prefer? To live a life of cemented reason, meeting out rigid judgements and banishing all wonder and connection. Or do we live by a kind of faith where all that we see is connected, interpenetrating and ... meaningful? Which way gives us a deeper peace and sense of 'correctness' in the universe? That the way of seeing our lives as part of a higher movement and connection, part of the larger being of "God", whatever that is, seems naive and foolish to some may in the end prove to be the greatest strength. How we conceive of "God" is how we see our everyday lives. Is it magical and connected, full of meaning, or is it cold, hard, unyielding and without more than what we experience physically? Which one is the way of the "animal" and which way the "human"? Pi is clealy sane. He endured something terrible, survived and tells his tale, in two radically different versions. Which one do we prefer?

There is MUCH here for many hours of contemplation and very lively discussion. Martel and Lee give us no express philosophical conclusions - that would be to give in to explanation, which is part of 'Reason'. The 'answers' to the many complex questions that come out of this incredible story are those that are FELT first. So in the end, Ang Lee has accomplised, beautifully and brutally, a film that poses intense questions on human nature and indeed on the nature of being itself with it's most profound "answers" wonderfully, profoundly found in the non-rational depths of an ocean of feeling. And he lets us decide how we will interpret them. One of the most provocative and moving films I have ever seen, gorgeously and meticulously wrought by a master. It truly is a must-see.

I think this is an excellent and gripping film and worthwhile seeing for older children, teenagers and adults. Most of all, it is about a young Hindu boy's spiritual journey, and for me the main theme is how he grew to give complete surrender to God for control of his present and future. There is a wonderful balance of humour with the tragedy and suspense in the film. The joke about his name is slightly vulgar, but funny all the same, and so typical of some little boys. I totally understand some people's concerns about the different religions mentioned, and there is a slight leaning toward the idea that all religions are equal. However, as his father says in the movie--you have to choose one road and to choose all of them is to have nothing!

There are many Christian references contained in the film. These include Pi saying that he found Christ, the priest quotes John 3:16, Pi is shown praying and seems to pray to accept Christ, he says grace before every meal and says amen, mention is made of Jesus' Sacrifice and how He died for the sins of many when He had not sinned, the fact that he refers to himself as Catholic first, and his request to be baptized. The way I take it is that he still has his East Indian culture, but identifies himself as a Christian.

It's a movie that can be appreciated on many different levels, and there is symbolism in the story, if you choose to see it. I wish I could get some other people's feelings on the symbolism of the tiger. To me he was representative of the boy's family with whom he was on a life journey, but they didn't get to say goodbye and to say thank you for all they had meant to each other. The tiger gave him life in many ways, and so did his family.

As you're probably gathering, this movie can be taken in many different ways. This is not a movie for young children due to the graphic nature of the ship wreck, some of the animal deaths, and how scary it is in some places because of the tiger living with him on the boat in the middle of the ocean. Also, take your motion sickness pills before going. After about an hour on the sea, I really started to feel it, ha ha. The 3D effects and cinematography are really quite stunning and if this movie doesn't win some Oscars I will be very much surprised.

I cannot say enough about the performance of Suraj Sharma who gave a brilliant acting performance. He is so believable as Pi and with this being his first film, I'd say he is a natural actor. Pi's romance is absolutely adorable as well. As a Canadian I loved the Canadian reference to Winnipeg. Apparently the writer of the book is a Canadian. I'd highly recommend this film which is brilliantly directed.

This is the first time I have pre ordered a movie and the transaction was seamless. The movie arrived 1 day after release date and worked flawlessly.

The movie was really good in our opinion. Will be watching it again.

Ang Lee's direction is masterful. He has brought a difficult story to life. Movie is certainly worth o couple of viewings.

Excellent metaphorical story line, supberb photography. Computer generated scenes undectable, surprise ending might of had greater emphasis. Should have won Academy over Lincoln

I was hesitant to buy it after reading some bad reviews. I'm glad I did. It's incredibly good. I cannot understand how anyone could give it less than 5 stars. One of the best movies ever made. it leaves you thinking....... and thinking...... and questioning your own concepts of what is real and what is not real long after the credits have ended.
A thought provoking film with the bonus of amazing scenery and cinemaphotography.

VIDEO:

‘Life of Pi’ arrives on blu ray with MPEG-4 AVC 1080p 1.85:1 encode. The transfer is pristine, with tremendous details and contrasts. Shot digitally with Arri Alexa cameras, the film has a very clean look. The contrasts and details are outstanding: see Pi's chapped lips after months on the life raft, or the individual beads of sand on his face when he washes up on shore, or the fine texture of the writer's t-shirt. All of the live-action cinematography is intense and sharp. The picture on the whole has a great sense of pop and clarity. Colours are vibrant and blacks are inky. The result is a great visual experience. (4.5/5)

AUDIO:

‘Life of Pi’ come with an energetic DTS-HD Master Audio 7.1 (48kHz, 24-bit), giving us an immersive experience: like the sinking of the cargo ship during the furious storm, swells pound the deck and water sprays, and rain pours down from all sides. We are also put right in the middle of the tempest. The showpiece audio sequence is probably the scene with the flying fish, which go darting and flapping through the soundfield, occasionally thwacking into Pi. The noise of Richard Parker's claws scraping the sides of the lifeboat, desperately trying to catch hold, is incredibly precise. Dialogue is easily understood. Surrounding the effects and voices is Mychael Danna's Academy Award-winning score, which effectively mixes Indian instrumentation with western orchestration. (5/5)

MOVIE:

Based on the acclaimed best-selling novel from Yann Martel that has been published in 40 languages, and brought to life by visionary Academy Award winning director Ang Lee, this magical adventure of hope, wonder, survival, and the power of the human spirit has been celebrated by critics all over the world. 'Life of Pi' follows Pi Patel, a young man on a fateful voyage who, after a spectacular disaster, is marooned on a lifeboat with the only other survivor, a fearsome 450 lb Bengal Tiger named Richard Parker. Hurtled into an epic journey of adventure and discovery Pi and his majestic companion make an amazing and unexpected connection. (5/5)

Principal photography started in Puducherry at the Holy Rosary Church in Muthialpet, and moved to other parts of India, including the popular hill station of Munnar in Kerala, as well as 2.5 months in Taiwan. The ocean scenes of the film were shot at a giant wave tank built by the crew in an abandoned airport in Taichung, Taiwan.

AWARDS:

2013 Academy Award Winners (more than any other film from 2012):
01 Best Director (Ang Lee)
02 Best Cinematography (Claudio Miranda)
03 Best Original Score (Mychael Danna)
04 Best Visual Effects (Bill Westonhofer, Guillaume Rocheron, Erik De Boer, Donald Elliott)

2013 Academy Award Nominations:
01 Best Picture (Gil Netter, Ang Lee, David Womack)(lost to Ben Affleck & George Clooney’s ‘Argo’)
02 Best Original Song (Pi’s Lullaby)(lost to ‘Skyfall’ by Adele)
03 Best Editing (lost to William Goldenberg’s ‘Argo’)
04 Best Production Design (lost to ‘Lincoln’)
05 Best Sound Editing (lost to ‘Skyfall’ and ‘Zero Dark Thirty’)
06 Best Sound Mixing (lost to ‘Les Miserables’)
07 Best Screenplay (lost to Chris Terrio’s ‘Argo’)

TRIVIA:

‘Life of Pi’ has an estimated budget of $120 million, and its worldwide gross so far is $586 million.

The second 2012 movie featuring Irrfan Khan that has a character named ‘Richard Parker’. The first is The Amazing Spider-Man.

86% of the tiger shots are CGI, while 14% (or 23 shots) are real. In some cases it's intercut with a CGI tiger. Scenes where a real tiger is used:

- The shot in the beginning where he's sitting
- Richard Parker swims in the water and can't get back onto the boat without Pi's help
- Most scenes where Pi is training the tiger with the stick.
- Richard Parker sits down and scratches his claws on a hatch below him

Did you notice that when Pi is telling the story, the camera is reflected in his eyes?

CONTROVERSIES:

The film was nominated for, and later won an Oscar for Best Visual Effects at the 2013 Academy Awards. Despite this, Rhythm & Hues Studios, who provided visual effects for the film, were forced to file for bankruptcy on February 11 2013, citing unfair competition from subsidized and tax exempt foreign studios. This sparked a demonstration of nearly 500 VFX artists who protested during the 2013 Academy Awards. The prolonged political acceptance speech for Best Visual Effects was drown out by the music from ‘Jaws.’ During his acceptance speech, Ang Lee, for some unknown reason, also did not thank the visual effects people, whom I think is primary responsible for the success of the film. However, his thanking and mentioning of Taiwan was headline news in Taiwan.

FINAL THOUGHTS:

If you have a 3D TV, ‘Life of Pi’ 3D is definitely the preferred experience. But the 2D version also has great depth and dimensionality. Besides the artistry of Ang Lee and Claudio Miranda, great credit must go to the Visual Effects department. It is sad to see the original company, Rhythm & Hues Studios, went into bankruptcy, citing unfair subsidy and tax exemption. In the past year, Toronto gave out lots of tax credits and exemptions, and has made big gain in luring a lot of movie business here, resulting in great loss in Vancouver’s movie industry. I guess this is just simply “business”. ‘Life of Pi’ is highly recommended.

Having read the book, I wondered how they could possibly make it into a movie successfully. They did a great job. The scenes on the boat with the animals are lifelike and amazing. It's not until you watch the extra portion of the DVD that you see how much of it has been animated. I would recommend the movie to anyone.

A great plot and very good acting - and an unusual ending I didn't expect. Now I'm inclined to read the book!