Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful Hardcover – Aug 22 2011
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
"Since the mid-nineties, Daniel Hamermesh . . . has done a series of studies on the role that appearance plays in the workplace, and his conclusion is captured by the title of his recent book, Beauty Pays. In the U.S., he finds, better-looking men earn four per cent more than average-looking men of similar education and experience, and uglier men earn thirteen per cent less. . . . Hamermesh finds that pulchritude is valuable in nearly all professions, not just those where good looks may seem to be an obvious asset."--Jim Surowiecki, New Yorker
"This chatty, economist's-eye-view of beauty in the marketplace provides solid statistical evidence that beauty does pay."--Publishers Weekly
"An extensive, dizzying compilation of economic data explaining 'why attractive people are more successful.' A 40-year veteran in the field of economics, Hamermesh examines the correlation between beauty and economics. . . . Fascinating."--Kirkus Reviews
"[A] no-warts-and-all exposé of how attractive people earn more, marry better and enjoy a wealth of positive discrimination."--Anjana Ahuja, Prospect
"Daniel Hamermesh . . . has long written about 'pulchronomics.' In Beauty Pays he reckons that, over a lifetime and assuming today's mean wages, a handsome working in America might on average make $230,000 more than a very plain one. There is evidence that attractive workers bring in more business, so it often makes sense for firms to hire them. Whether rewarding them accordingly--and paying their less attractive peers more stingily--is good for society is another matter."--Economist
"If you live in the west and have lately looked at any magazine, watched any television, seen any movie, common sense would dictate that those who are better looking accrue the benefits of such a genetic roll of the dice. But what exactly those benefits are and if they are measurable is the point of Beauty Pays. . . . [T]his book . . . will prove more than just eye candy."--New York Journal of Books
"University of Texas labor economist Daniel Hamermesh has devoted a share of his career to the study of physical beauty and how it affects employment and earning potential. In his new book, Beauty Pays, he offers up all sorts of data he's collected over years of work. His broad point, that attractive people enjoy advantages in hiring and earning, will surprise no one. But some of the details packed inside this thoughtful and in some respects quirky and confounding book, are illuminating."--Susan Adams, Forbes
"Hamermesh's analysis of empirical studies in his book Beauty Pays appears to suggest that being attractive does, indeed, bring measurable materials benefits. . . . Hamermesh's research appears to have clear implications for policy."--Sunday Times
"Economist Daniel Hamermesh argues that ugliness is no different from race or a disability, and suggests unattractive people deserve legal protection."--Luke Salkeld, Daily Mail
"Beauty Pays is intriguing and easy to read."--World Magazine
"In his book, Hamermesh concludes that better-looking employees are more productive, leading to higher sales and potentially higher profit. [Beauty Pays] also shows how society generates premium pay for beauty and penalties for ugliness. Hamermesh says beautiful people earn $230,000 more in a lifetime than workers with below-average looks."--Sheryl Jean, Dallas Morning News
"Professor Daniel Hamermesh . . . has investigated the financial benefits of beauty and found that looks have a bigger impact on our lifetime earning power than education. In his book, Beauty Pays, Professor Hamermesh says beautiful people are more likely to get jobs, raises and promotions, and suggests that, over a lifetime, the best-looking workers will earn about 10-15 percent more per year than the ugliest."--Australian Women's Weekly
"Looks matter. . . . Labor markets as well as marriage markets, according to Daniel Hamermesh, offer premiums for good looks and penalties for ugliness. In Beauty Pays, Hamermesh assesses the role of appearance in American society, explores the options available to 'looks-challenged' people, and demonstrates that, although it's in its infancy, and is easy to mock, 'pulchronomics' (the economics of beauty) is a serious and significant subject."--Barron's
"Beauty Pays is a pleasant and interesting read, but along the way it will challenge many of your preconceptions and leave you wondering why we as a society do not do more to protect those with less desirable looks."--Times Higher Education
"For the last 20 years, Texas economist Hamermesh has been intrigued by, and has contributed significant research on, what one may term 'The Economics of Beauty'. This short, provocative, engaging volume takes its audience through the author's previous work and contemporary data, analyses, and impact of being considered good-looking by others on one's labor-market outcomes (employment and compensation); in the social world of friends and family; and even the extent to which one's happiness is affected by the presence (or absence) of looks. . . . Whether at the beach, on an airplane, or in the seminar room, Beauty Pays pays handsome dividends for intelligent lay readers, scholars, and public policy decision makers."--Choice
"The book is absorbing and disturbing, for the thought upper most in the mind is 'Am I beautiful (enough).'"--Vaidehi Nathan, Organiser
"The real value of this book lies not so much in its synthesis of existing results, but rather in the fact that it collects such results in a single volume. Observing side-by-side the various privileges bestowed upon the beautiful paints a picture that is more than the sum of its parts. Even though some specific results in the book may be driven by omitted variables, others are cleanly identified, and the overall set of studies builds a compelling case for the view that 'beauty pays'--being beautiful is valuable whether you are looking for a job, a loan, or a spouse."--Emir Kamenica, Journal of Economic Literature
"Beauty Pays, fascinating read, starts with the important data collection issues and questions. . . . Written by a prominent labor economist, shows the reader why beauty can rightly be under the purview or economists."--Jennifer Tennant, Eastern Economic Journal
"Reflecting on a sensitive issue that touches everyone, Beauty Pays proves that beauty's rewards are anything but superficial."--World Book Industry
From the Back Cover
"If there was ever any doubt that Dan Hamermesh is the dean of beauty--of explaining beauty, at least--this book should put that to rest. He writes so lucidly and charmingly about such a compelling subject that you will never again look at a beautiful face (or an ugly one) without thinking of the many economic consequences. Bravo!"--Stephen J. Dubner, coauthor of Freakonomics
"Beauty is all around us. And it has value. Hamermesh, the founder of the economics of beauty, crunches the numbers and shows us what we've all suspected: the world looks different--and better--when you are beautiful. This book addresses the economics of beauty, but more importantly, it reveals the beauty of economics."--Justin Wolfers, University of Pennsylvania and Brookings Institution
"Beauty Pays is provocative and informative."--Joel Waldfogel, author of Scroogenomics
"Beauty Pays provides the first serious analysis of a significant aspect of human behavior: how beauty affects economic transactions and outcomes. This important book will receive a great deal of attention."--Naci Mocan, Louisiana State University
See all Product Description
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
There was a guy who came to the office who looked like Jude Law. He had a cute, exotic Scottish accent too. It didn't matter how trivial any concern he had; I was always delighted whenever he came by. The author says beauty is scarce and people are willing to give others widgets in order to be in their beautiful presence. Then again, there was the person with a big, nasty, lazy eye who often came to the office. The eye looked just like the commercial character Digger the Dermatophile (sp?). It would bother me terribly when this person visited. I never understood why they couldn't just call. The author stresses that there's an ugly penalty that works hand in hand with beauty privilege.
The author never mentions Milton Friedman, but I'm sure he comes from that University of Chicago view of economics that says economic principles can explain everything. I thought this was readable, but less sophisticated readers may struggle a bit. The author is trying to write for the masses, even though his curriculum vitae is surely filled with high-falutin' writing. He peals the onion in looking at this matter. He asks do the beautiful just have more esteem and skills. He asks if we can just all have surgeries to be beautiful. This book is filled with cross-national comparisons. However, I don't know if that makes the work deep or if this is a sign that the author is grabbing for straws.
The author only focuses on physiognomy; if I understand correctly that means the shape and look of the face. So height and weight aren't really brought up here. I'm not sure that was right to drop those traits out of the picture. Many people tell fat woman, "But you have such a pretty face." Please see Camryn Manheim's autobiography as an example. When I can think of a whole group that get praised for their face and punished for their bodies, I don't know if that should be ignored. To be honest, I think something should be done to protect short men from discrimination too.
The work tries to use helpful, real-life examples. The author said notice that hottie Harry Hamlin played a trial lawyer on "L.A. Law" while a less attractive man was a tax attorney. He notes that Dustin Hoffman has won two Oscars, even though he's not known as a hottie. This made me think about politics. The press says close to nothing, but Mitt Romney is helped by looking so handsome. Chris Christie decided not to run for president and some wonder if he couldn't deal with the fat jokes that would be sure to come. How were Ross Perot's presidential chances hindered by his looks?
The author advocates that maybe the less attractive should get EEOC protection like some do based on race, age, or creed. I'm a little skeptical on that. I'm not sure plaintiffs would be willing to come out as ugly. The author gives examples of a woman with a port wine stain on her face or a worker missing teeth as examples of people that have made waves in anti-discrimination law. I would have liked to hear of more examples of that. This category still seems too nebulous to me for judges to take them seriously, especially the conservative judges appointed by the elephant-symbol party.
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Business & Investing > Business Life > Ethics
- Books > Business & Investing > Economics > Theory
- Books > Business & Investing > Industries & Professions > Human Resources & Personnel Management
- Books > Business & Investing > Job Hunting & Careers > Guides
- Books > Business & Investing > Popular Economics
- Books > Business & Investing > Processes & Infrastructure > Workplace
- Books > Business & Investing > Skills > Communications
- Books > Health, Fitness & Dieting > Beauty & Fashion
- Books > Professional & Technical > Accounting & Finance > Economics > Theory
- Books > Professional & Technical > Business Management > Human Resources & Personnel Management
- Books > Professional & Technical > Business Management > Management & Leadership > Business Ethics