Flip to back
Flip to front
Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor Paperback – Illustrated, May 8 2001
by
Robert Stinnett
(Author)
See all formats and editions
Hide other formats and editions
|
Amazon Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
|
— | — |
|
Audible Audiobook, Abridged
"Please retry"
|
Free with your Audible trial | ||
|
Hardcover
"Please retry"
|
CDN$ 46.13 | CDN$ 10.71 |
|
Paperback, Illustrated
"Please retry"
|
CDN$ 15.83
|
CDN$ 13.75 | CDN$ 10.76 |
|
Audio Cassette, Abridged, Audiobook
"Please retry"
|
—
|
CDN$ 37.72 | CDN$ 29.83 |
-
Kindle Edition
CDN$ 18.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
CDN$ 0.00 Free with your Audible trial -
Hardcover
CDN$ 47.3615 Used from CDN$ 10.71 6 New from CDN$ 46.13 -
Paperback
CDN$ 15.8321 Used from CDN$ 10.76 14 New from CDN$ 13.75 -
Audio Cassette
from CDN$ 29.831 Used from CDN$ 29.83 1 New from CDN$ 37.72
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
Start reading Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; Illustrated edition (May 8 2001)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0743201299
- ISBN-13 : 978-0743201292
- Item Weight : 500 g
- Dimensions : 15.56 x 2.79 x 23.5 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: #183,656 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Product description
Review
Richard Bernstein The New York Times It is difficult, after reading this copiously documented book, not to wonder about previously unchallenged assumptions about Pearl Harbor.
Bruce Bartlett The Wall Street Journal Fascinating and readable....Exceptionally well-presented.
Bruce Bartlett The Wall Street Journal Fascinating and readable....Exceptionally well-presented.
About the Author
Robert Stinnett served in the United States Navy from 1942 to 1946, where he earned ten battle stars and a Presidential Unit Citation. He is the author of George Bush: His World War II Years. Before devoting himself to writing Day of Deceit, he was a photographer and journalist for the Oakland Tribune. He is a consultant on the Pacific War for the BBC, Asahi Television, and NHK Television in Japan. He lives in Oakland, California.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Chapter One: The Biggest Story of My Life
Washington
December 8, 1941
About 1:00 A.M.
Edward R. Murrow couldn't sleep. His wife, Janet, watched him pace in their hotel room. He was chain-smoking. Murrow, the CBS radio newsman, had just returned from a midnight meeting with President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the White House. Japan's carrier and submarine raid on Pearl Harbor had taken place twelve hours earlier, and the full impact of the military disaster was slowly sinking in for FDR and the American people.
During their twenty-five-minute discussion in the second-floor Oval Study, the President provided Murrow with something -- we will never know exactly what -- that any reporter would kill for. That night he told his wife, "It's the biggest story of my life, but I don't know if it's my duty to tell it or forget it." Long after the war ended, Murrow was asked about this meeting by author-journalist John Gunther. After a long pause, Murrow replied: "That story would send Casey Murrow through college, and if you think I'm going to give it to you, you're out of your mind."
Earlier in the week, the Murrows had accepted a personal dinner invitation from the Roosevelts. First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt personally prepared, cooked, and served supper for two dozen guests. Her specialty was scrambled eggs and sausage, cooked in an electric chafing dish that sat atop a long buffet table in the family dining room. It was the invariable menu. Since the regular White House staff was given Sunday off, she did the cooking while the President mixed the cocktails.
After he heard the first news flashes about the Pearl Harbor raid, Murrow checked with the White House to see if the supper was still on. Told that it was, he and Janet then walked across Lafayette Park, crossed Pennsylvania Avenue, and entered the mansion through the North Portico. After the Murrows were ushered into the dining room, Mrs. Roosevelt explained that the President was meeting with congressional leaders and military officers and could not join them for supper.
Outside on Pennsylvania Avenue a small crowd had gathered. The White House was ablaze with light. No one inside the mansion thought to pull the window shades or institute blackouts on the first day of war -- that would came later. An Associated Press photographer took a picture from Lafayette Park. It shows a window in the family dining room with a silhouette of a tall figure -- probably the First Lady -- presiding over her scrambled eggs.
During the dinner, White House chief usher Howell Crim asked Murrow to remain for an informal meeting with FDR. After Janet Murrow returned to their hotel, her husband went to the second floor and waited outside Roosevelt's Oval Study -- not to be confused with the Oval Office -- in the West Wing of the White House. Soon Murrow was joined by William "Wild Bill" Donovan, Roosevelt's Coordinator of Information and later founder of the wartime Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the CIA.
Donovan had not been present at dinner but had been summoned by the President from New York, where he had been watching a football game at the Polo Grounds. Football fans heard an unusual announcement over the public address system about 2:30 that afternoon: "Colonel William Donovan, come to the box office at once. There is an important phone message." The message was from James Roosevelt, the President's son and a member of Donovan's staff; he told Donovan about the Japanese attack.
Throughout the evening of December 7, Roosevelt conferred with congressional and military leaders. He decided his first wartime move would come the next morning, December 8, when he would ask Congress to declare that a state of war existed between Japan and the United States. He prepared a rough draft of what later became his "Day of Infamy" speech. Then he invited Murrow and Donovan into the study for a midnight snack of sandwiches and cold beer. Chief Usher Crim noted that the three men spent twenty-five minutes together in the study before Roosevelt retired to his adjoining bedroom. Crim's arrival and departure notations in the Usher Book comprise the only official record; there were no official minutes of the meeting.
Only Donovan has hinted at what went on: the conversation was mostly about public reaction to the attack. He sensed that this was FDR's overriding concern. In 1953, while he served as ambassador to Thailand, Donovan disclosed the details of the meeting to his executive assistant, William J. vanden Heuvel, who summarized the recollections in his diary. The President asked Murrow and Donovan whether they thought the attack was a clear case of a first Japanese move that would unite Americans behind a declaration of war against the Axis powers. Both guests thought it would indeed have that effect.
Donovan believed that Roosevelt welcomed the attack and that it was less of a surprise to him than it was to others in the White House. FDR claimed he sent an advance warning to Pearl Harbor that an attack by Japan was imminent. "They caught our ships like lame ducks! Lame ducks, Bill. We told them, at Pearl Harbor and everywhere else, to have the lookouts manned. But they still took us by surprise."
Still not convinced that America's isolationist sentiments would change after this attack, FDR then read to the two men from a message he had received from a British Foreign Office official, T. North Whitehead: "The dictator powers have presented us with a united America." Roosevelt wondered whether Whitehead's assessment was correct. Again he asked, would America now support a declaration of war? Donovan and Murrow again replied in the affirmative.
Whitehead was an influential member of the Foreign Office and an advisor to Prime Minister Winston Churchill on matters affecting America's aid to the British in 1940 and 1941. He evaluated American public opinion and "read" FDR's mind for the Prime Minister. In written comments to Churchill in the fall of 1940, Whitehead had warned of continued United States isolationism, but predicted it could be overcome: "America is not in the bag. However, the President is engaged in carefully calculated steps to give us full assistance."
Several years later Murrow made a brief, circumspect broadcast that in part addressed the question of what the President had known before the Japanese hit Pearl Harbor. According to Murrow's biographer Ann Sperber, "The broadcast itself was a response to an article by John Chamberlain in LIFE magazine charging Roosevelt with foreknowledge of the attack. Murrow did not believe it and said so on the air, making it clear that he had only his instinct to go on."
In the end, Murrow's big story remained unwritten and unbroadcast. Sperber believed that the meeting concerned damage reports. Whatever it was, it weighed heavily on Murrow's mind. "But he couldn't forget it either, blaming himself at times thereafter for not going with the story, never determining to his satisfaction where his duties lay that night or what had been in the subtle mind of FDR," Sperber wrote. Murrow took the story to his grave. He died April 7, 1965, two days past his fifty-seventh birthday.
Had FDR revealed something that night about his foreknowledge? Damage reports emerged immediately in local Hawaii papers, though the full details of the American losses were not released to the nation's news media until December 16, 1941, by Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox. He confirmed the initial report by the Honolulu Star-Bulletin. Secretary Knox named the seven warships sunk: USS Arizona, USS Utah, USS Oklahoma, USS Cassin, USS Downes, USS Shaw, and USS Oglala. He said the human toll on Oahu was 2897 Americans killed, 879 wounded, and 26 missing. There was severe damage to the Army's aircraft and hangars on Oahu. Knox said the Japanese planes came from aircraft carriers and had the "most tremendously detailed" information of the naval layout at Pearl Harbor. He listed Japan's losses at forty-one planes shot down, and disclosed the American capture of a Japanese two-man midget submarine that had gone aground on an Oahu beach and the sinking of four other Japanese midget subs.
Once the nation's news media reported the attack details on December 16, 1941, there was no "big story" left to report on the main events at Pearl Harbor. None -- except speculation about Roosevelt's foreknowledge. Certain words and phrases cited by Donovan hinted at what he and Murrow were told by FDR. William vanden Heuvel's diary, according to author Anthony Cave Brown, is tantalizing: "The President's surprise was not as great as that of other men around him. Nor was the attack unwelcome. It had ended the past months of uncertainty caused by FDR's decision that Japan must be seen to make the first overt move."
Any conclusion about the Murrow meeting must remain speculative, because the participants refused to tell the story. However, there are many more direct pieces of evidence from the days and weeks leading up to December 7 that put the question of FDR's foreknowledge definitively to rest. Previous accounts have claimed that the United States had not cracked Japanese military codes prior to the attack. We now know this is wrong. Previous accounts have insisted that the Japanese fleet maintained strict radio silence. This, too, is wrong. The truth is clear: FDR knew.
The real question is even more intriguing: did he deliberately provoke the attack? Were there earlier covert moves by the United States? According to a secret strategy memo, dated October 7, 1940, and adopted by the President, there were.
Copyright © 2000 by Robert B. Stinnett
Washington
December 8, 1941
About 1:00 A.M.
Edward R. Murrow couldn't sleep. His wife, Janet, watched him pace in their hotel room. He was chain-smoking. Murrow, the CBS radio newsman, had just returned from a midnight meeting with President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the White House. Japan's carrier and submarine raid on Pearl Harbor had taken place twelve hours earlier, and the full impact of the military disaster was slowly sinking in for FDR and the American people.
During their twenty-five-minute discussion in the second-floor Oval Study, the President provided Murrow with something -- we will never know exactly what -- that any reporter would kill for. That night he told his wife, "It's the biggest story of my life, but I don't know if it's my duty to tell it or forget it." Long after the war ended, Murrow was asked about this meeting by author-journalist John Gunther. After a long pause, Murrow replied: "That story would send Casey Murrow through college, and if you think I'm going to give it to you, you're out of your mind."
Earlier in the week, the Murrows had accepted a personal dinner invitation from the Roosevelts. First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt personally prepared, cooked, and served supper for two dozen guests. Her specialty was scrambled eggs and sausage, cooked in an electric chafing dish that sat atop a long buffet table in the family dining room. It was the invariable menu. Since the regular White House staff was given Sunday off, she did the cooking while the President mixed the cocktails.
After he heard the first news flashes about the Pearl Harbor raid, Murrow checked with the White House to see if the supper was still on. Told that it was, he and Janet then walked across Lafayette Park, crossed Pennsylvania Avenue, and entered the mansion through the North Portico. After the Murrows were ushered into the dining room, Mrs. Roosevelt explained that the President was meeting with congressional leaders and military officers and could not join them for supper.
Outside on Pennsylvania Avenue a small crowd had gathered. The White House was ablaze with light. No one inside the mansion thought to pull the window shades or institute blackouts on the first day of war -- that would came later. An Associated Press photographer took a picture from Lafayette Park. It shows a window in the family dining room with a silhouette of a tall figure -- probably the First Lady -- presiding over her scrambled eggs.
During the dinner, White House chief usher Howell Crim asked Murrow to remain for an informal meeting with FDR. After Janet Murrow returned to their hotel, her husband went to the second floor and waited outside Roosevelt's Oval Study -- not to be confused with the Oval Office -- in the West Wing of the White House. Soon Murrow was joined by William "Wild Bill" Donovan, Roosevelt's Coordinator of Information and later founder of the wartime Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the CIA.
Donovan had not been present at dinner but had been summoned by the President from New York, where he had been watching a football game at the Polo Grounds. Football fans heard an unusual announcement over the public address system about 2:30 that afternoon: "Colonel William Donovan, come to the box office at once. There is an important phone message." The message was from James Roosevelt, the President's son and a member of Donovan's staff; he told Donovan about the Japanese attack.
Throughout the evening of December 7, Roosevelt conferred with congressional and military leaders. He decided his first wartime move would come the next morning, December 8, when he would ask Congress to declare that a state of war existed between Japan and the United States. He prepared a rough draft of what later became his "Day of Infamy" speech. Then he invited Murrow and Donovan into the study for a midnight snack of sandwiches and cold beer. Chief Usher Crim noted that the three men spent twenty-five minutes together in the study before Roosevelt retired to his adjoining bedroom. Crim's arrival and departure notations in the Usher Book comprise the only official record; there were no official minutes of the meeting.
Only Donovan has hinted at what went on: the conversation was mostly about public reaction to the attack. He sensed that this was FDR's overriding concern. In 1953, while he served as ambassador to Thailand, Donovan disclosed the details of the meeting to his executive assistant, William J. vanden Heuvel, who summarized the recollections in his diary. The President asked Murrow and Donovan whether they thought the attack was a clear case of a first Japanese move that would unite Americans behind a declaration of war against the Axis powers. Both guests thought it would indeed have that effect.
Donovan believed that Roosevelt welcomed the attack and that it was less of a surprise to him than it was to others in the White House. FDR claimed he sent an advance warning to Pearl Harbor that an attack by Japan was imminent. "They caught our ships like lame ducks! Lame ducks, Bill. We told them, at Pearl Harbor and everywhere else, to have the lookouts manned. But they still took us by surprise."
Still not convinced that America's isolationist sentiments would change after this attack, FDR then read to the two men from a message he had received from a British Foreign Office official, T. North Whitehead: "The dictator powers have presented us with a united America." Roosevelt wondered whether Whitehead's assessment was correct. Again he asked, would America now support a declaration of war? Donovan and Murrow again replied in the affirmative.
Whitehead was an influential member of the Foreign Office and an advisor to Prime Minister Winston Churchill on matters affecting America's aid to the British in 1940 and 1941. He evaluated American public opinion and "read" FDR's mind for the Prime Minister. In written comments to Churchill in the fall of 1940, Whitehead had warned of continued United States isolationism, but predicted it could be overcome: "America is not in the bag. However, the President is engaged in carefully calculated steps to give us full assistance."
Several years later Murrow made a brief, circumspect broadcast that in part addressed the question of what the President had known before the Japanese hit Pearl Harbor. According to Murrow's biographer Ann Sperber, "The broadcast itself was a response to an article by John Chamberlain in LIFE magazine charging Roosevelt with foreknowledge of the attack. Murrow did not believe it and said so on the air, making it clear that he had only his instinct to go on."
In the end, Murrow's big story remained unwritten and unbroadcast. Sperber believed that the meeting concerned damage reports. Whatever it was, it weighed heavily on Murrow's mind. "But he couldn't forget it either, blaming himself at times thereafter for not going with the story, never determining to his satisfaction where his duties lay that night or what had been in the subtle mind of FDR," Sperber wrote. Murrow took the story to his grave. He died April 7, 1965, two days past his fifty-seventh birthday.
Had FDR revealed something that night about his foreknowledge? Damage reports emerged immediately in local Hawaii papers, though the full details of the American losses were not released to the nation's news media until December 16, 1941, by Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox. He confirmed the initial report by the Honolulu Star-Bulletin. Secretary Knox named the seven warships sunk: USS Arizona, USS Utah, USS Oklahoma, USS Cassin, USS Downes, USS Shaw, and USS Oglala. He said the human toll on Oahu was 2897 Americans killed, 879 wounded, and 26 missing. There was severe damage to the Army's aircraft and hangars on Oahu. Knox said the Japanese planes came from aircraft carriers and had the "most tremendously detailed" information of the naval layout at Pearl Harbor. He listed Japan's losses at forty-one planes shot down, and disclosed the American capture of a Japanese two-man midget submarine that had gone aground on an Oahu beach and the sinking of four other Japanese midget subs.
Once the nation's news media reported the attack details on December 16, 1941, there was no "big story" left to report on the main events at Pearl Harbor. None -- except speculation about Roosevelt's foreknowledge. Certain words and phrases cited by Donovan hinted at what he and Murrow were told by FDR. William vanden Heuvel's diary, according to author Anthony Cave Brown, is tantalizing: "The President's surprise was not as great as that of other men around him. Nor was the attack unwelcome. It had ended the past months of uncertainty caused by FDR's decision that Japan must be seen to make the first overt move."
Any conclusion about the Murrow meeting must remain speculative, because the participants refused to tell the story. However, there are many more direct pieces of evidence from the days and weeks leading up to December 7 that put the question of FDR's foreknowledge definitively to rest. Previous accounts have claimed that the United States had not cracked Japanese military codes prior to the attack. We now know this is wrong. Previous accounts have insisted that the Japanese fleet maintained strict radio silence. This, too, is wrong. The truth is clear: FDR knew.
The real question is even more intriguing: did he deliberately provoke the attack? Were there earlier covert moves by the United States? According to a secret strategy memo, dated October 7, 1940, and adopted by the President, there were.
Copyright © 2000 by Robert B. Stinnett
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
The CIA as Organized Crime: How Illegal Operations Corrupt America and the WorldPaperback
Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to WarPerfect Paperback
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War.Hardcover
The Controversy of ZionPaperback
Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the WorldChristopher Lee BollynPaperback
How Britain Initiated both World WarsNick KollerstromPaperback
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
256 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in Canada on September 27, 2019
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Liked it
Helpful
Reviewed in Canada on February 2, 2015
Verified Purchase
A great writing from a man who lived it! Lots of great evidence in this book
Reviewed in Canada on June 18, 2014
Verified Purchase
Perhaps Roosevelt in a backward way welcomed the clearing of the air in that Hitler declared war on the US when it didn't have to but the suggestions that Roosevelt entrapped thousands in Hawaii deliberately is too much of a stretch. It is pretty clear he thought the advances would come in the Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia) where the resources that the Japanese wanted were located. Even Admiral Yamato thought attacking Pearl was the wrong move. The detail provided is supposed to prove the author's case but anyone who has been involved in such times knows that there are a host of conflicting reasons why things didn't go as later armchair politicos and amateur strategists think they should. Even if Roosevelt did push the issue, the American population, particularly the Republicans were blind to the real dangers that Hitler presented of far more and greater risk of long-term danger than Japan ever would be.
Robert Sinnett has done his country a disservice by advancing this unconvincing tale. It is far more likely that the real issue was a combination of ignorance, finger trouble and, let's face it, the forces in Hawaii were blind to the international temper of the times. Why is it that Americans have to find a goat in everything?
Robert Sinnett has done his country a disservice by advancing this unconvincing tale. It is far more likely that the real issue was a combination of ignorance, finger trouble and, let's face it, the forces in Hawaii were blind to the international temper of the times. Why is it that Americans have to find a goat in everything?
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Canada on January 16, 2016
Verified Purchase
This is a very informative book.I have not finished it as it is full of facts and referances and dry reading.You cannot read this half asleep and get much out of it.
Reviewed in Canada on January 24, 2018
Verified Purchase
Exactly what I wanted
Reviewed in Canada on April 4, 2004
The reviewer from Southern California on 26 Sept 2001 make an interesting statement that FDR knew from intercepted dipomatic message that Germany will declared war on US when Japan attacked the United States. Funny that I didn't see that in the book anywhere and for sure, its not in the index. I wondered where that reviewer got his information since I never heard of it. If such thing were true, then FDR may had a case for covering up and allowing the Japanese to attacked.
But since I haven't seen it on paper yet, I have to go along with the fact that if FDR wanted a war with Germany, Japan would be the last source. Did FDR knew that Germany would declared war on US? Did FDR knew that Hitler would make such a stupid blunder that will caused Germany repeat the mistakes of 1917 and if so, how come no one has written about such foresight? Becuase if all the answers to these questions are "NO", then this book don't have a purpose despite of all the nice writing and evidences provided by the author. Without war with Germany, there was no sense in having war with Japan, in fact that would be the exact opposite of what FDR wanted!! Japan's alliance with Germany did not gurantee Germany's declaration since such alliance was of a defensive nature. Why would anyone think that FDR wanted a war with Japan without Germany? If there is an evidence of prior knowledge that Germany will entered the war against the United States with Japan, I would like to know about it. That would be a real conspiracy worth reading about. But I doubt that the Japanese dipomatic corps knew anything about Pearl Harbor planning while Germany was still kind of hoping that Japan would help them against the Russians. But this book does not show such revealing evidence and in the end, its all second guessing, hindsight analysis and conjectures based on very good research but pointless without the real prize.
But since I haven't seen it on paper yet, I have to go along with the fact that if FDR wanted a war with Germany, Japan would be the last source. Did FDR knew that Germany would declared war on US? Did FDR knew that Hitler would make such a stupid blunder that will caused Germany repeat the mistakes of 1917 and if so, how come no one has written about such foresight? Becuase if all the answers to these questions are "NO", then this book don't have a purpose despite of all the nice writing and evidences provided by the author. Without war with Germany, there was no sense in having war with Japan, in fact that would be the exact opposite of what FDR wanted!! Japan's alliance with Germany did not gurantee Germany's declaration since such alliance was of a defensive nature. Why would anyone think that FDR wanted a war with Japan without Germany? If there is an evidence of prior knowledge that Germany will entered the war against the United States with Japan, I would like to know about it. That would be a real conspiracy worth reading about. But I doubt that the Japanese dipomatic corps knew anything about Pearl Harbor planning while Germany was still kind of hoping that Japan would help them against the Russians. But this book does not show such revealing evidence and in the end, its all second guessing, hindsight analysis and conjectures based on very good research but pointless without the real prize.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Canada on June 26, 2001
It is perhaps unfair to give this book a single star. For the effort and success that was spent on this book to make it credible it would deserve 4 or 5 stars. The problem is, it's bunk. I bought the book and read it, and got suitably outraged at the fact that all of this had been witheld. Outraged enough that I had to figure out if it were true. So I spent more time than I care to think about checking the references and tracking down the facts behind his assertions. To be blunt, most don't hold up.
To cite just one example, he mentions that the US was tracking the fleet via radio signals and cites much decoded traffic in support. What he glosses over is that the traffic in question comes from before the fleet sailed and after it had attacked with a large gap during the time that the fleet was at sea. In addition, every (and I mean EVERY) Japanese crewman from the fleet who has talked aboput it has steadfastedly maintained that there was no radio-traffic at all. All communication was with flags and lights, planes had their radios disconnected, etc. So, we have no message traffic records for the US intercept services and the Japanese confirm that nothing was sent. Yet, this book cites these interceptions that apparently never happened as being a large part of the conspiracy. This very hole in the message traffic has been often shown to have scared the war department very much, as they had lost track of carrier fleet! They were convinced that it was heading for the Philipines and not Pearl, which was their fatal mistake.
Most of the book is like this, at first read compelling and damning but then falling to shreds when closely examined.
The simple fact is that the US was trying to avoid a war with Japan, an oil embargo was enacted long after the Japanese started slaughtering their estimated 50 million victims right around the time the Japanese began taking territory that was useful only for the attack on colonial provinces in the south of Asia. Once it became obvious that they were heading for a war an attempt was made to take the steam out of their drive peacefully. The Navy itself was sending memos that asserted that the US Navy was ill-equipped and unprepared for a war. If it was indeed a cnspiracy, it was one that was pursued by doing everything that was possible to have the US as unprepared and in the worst possible position for it.
Lots of research, well written, and the author should be ashamed of himself.
To cite just one example, he mentions that the US was tracking the fleet via radio signals and cites much decoded traffic in support. What he glosses over is that the traffic in question comes from before the fleet sailed and after it had attacked with a large gap during the time that the fleet was at sea. In addition, every (and I mean EVERY) Japanese crewman from the fleet who has talked aboput it has steadfastedly maintained that there was no radio-traffic at all. All communication was with flags and lights, planes had their radios disconnected, etc. So, we have no message traffic records for the US intercept services and the Japanese confirm that nothing was sent. Yet, this book cites these interceptions that apparently never happened as being a large part of the conspiracy. This very hole in the message traffic has been often shown to have scared the war department very much, as they had lost track of carrier fleet! They were convinced that it was heading for the Philipines and not Pearl, which was their fatal mistake.
Most of the book is like this, at first read compelling and damning but then falling to shreds when closely examined.
The simple fact is that the US was trying to avoid a war with Japan, an oil embargo was enacted long after the Japanese started slaughtering their estimated 50 million victims right around the time the Japanese began taking territory that was useful only for the attack on colonial provinces in the south of Asia. Once it became obvious that they were heading for a war an attempt was made to take the steam out of their drive peacefully. The Navy itself was sending memos that asserted that the US Navy was ill-equipped and unprepared for a war. If it was indeed a cnspiracy, it was one that was pursued by doing everything that was possible to have the US as unprepared and in the worst possible position for it.
Lots of research, well written, and the author should be ashamed of himself.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
M. Brown
4.0 out of 5 stars
Day of Deceit: A Little More of the Truth about ??? and Pearl Harbour
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 30, 2017Verified Purchase
Mr Stinnett clearly demonstrated that parts of the US intelligence service were aware of the movement of the Japanese fleet across the Pacific and that the US government COULD have known about the forthcoming attack. He does not show that the government SHOULD have known nor indeed that it DID know. Histories of British Intelligence in the early years of the war(1939 and 1940) show that inadequate or even no use was made of information provided by the intelligence services for want of properly developed means for handling such information. In this book Mr Stinnett repeatedly attributes the failing to Roosevelt in person without any evidence. His research would however form a basis for pursuing this problem of handling of intelligence.
The reader is subject to a continuous and overwhelming barrage of the numerous instances of foreknowledge, but the lack of organisation in the presentation makes it difficult to comprehend the network of events and the use of evidence to support the author's argument.
Much evidence is presented showing that the hapless commanders in Hawaii were kept in the dark, but no evidence is given as to the reason why.
The McCullum paper outlining how to induce Japan into a war, is inadequately supported by other material, but the subject really merits another book - or two.
Not even a mention is made of the intelligence work of Capt Eric Nave of the Royal Navy and Royal Australian Navy, who deduced the place and date of the forthcoming attack.
The reader is subject to a continuous and overwhelming barrage of the numerous instances of foreknowledge, but the lack of organisation in the presentation makes it difficult to comprehend the network of events and the use of evidence to support the author's argument.
Much evidence is presented showing that the hapless commanders in Hawaii were kept in the dark, but no evidence is given as to the reason why.
The McCullum paper outlining how to induce Japan into a war, is inadequately supported by other material, but the subject really merits another book - or two.
Not even a mention is made of the intelligence work of Capt Eric Nave of the Royal Navy and Royal Australian Navy, who deduced the place and date of the forthcoming attack.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Liz Perryman
5.0 out of 5 stars
No deceit with this transaction
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 6, 2020Verified Purchase
Excellent copy of book. Love learning and this adds to my study options.
Great condition and perfect price
Great condition and perfect price
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Ted
5.0 out of 5 stars
Condition is very accurate
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 7, 2018Verified Purchase
Good suplier, Books are always as described and arrive on time.
My first choice for old books may not be the cheapest but the best and are reliable.
My first choice for old books may not be the cheapest but the best and are reliable.
Pat Sheehan
5.0 out of 5 stars
Pleased with it
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 20, 2016Verified Purchase
It is the book I ordered, what can I say other than it was in good condition and it covered the topic described in great detail, well researched.
David Saphir
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 30, 2017Verified Purchase
Just great
Fast, FREE delivery, video streaming, music, and much more
Prime members enjoy Free Two-Day Shipping, Free Same-Day or One-Day Delivery to select areas, Prime Video, Prime Music, Prime Reading, and more.

