Democracy After Liberalism: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics Hardcover – Nov 9 2004
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
No one wishing to possess a concise yet conceptually comprehensive account of the questions bedeviling liberalism will be disappointed with Robert B. Talisse's Democracy After Liberalism
. -- New Political Science
A concise and clear assessment of contemporary political theory...This is a book to be read with profit by professor, student, and layperson alike. Talisse skillfully summarizes debates that fill shelves of books, providing accounts that not only are conceptually clear but also frame the debate for further investigation...The virtue of Democracy After Liberalism is that it successfully clarifies the positions and the stakes of contemporary debates in political philosophy. In the end, Talisse himself cannot be said to have offered more than one highly plausible and engaging resolution to the confusion of political ideas in which we live. This is no mean accomplishment, and Democracy After Liberalism makes for rewarding reading... Liberalism is not finished yet; not in fact and certainly not within the form of deliberativism set forth in Talisse's excellent book. --Project Muse
About the Author
Robert Talisse is Assistant Professor of PHilosophy at Vanderbilt University. He has written several books including On Dewey (2000), On Rawls (2001) and On James (2004). He is also the co-editor of the forthcoming American Philosophy: An Encyclopedia (Routledge).
Top Customer Reviews
Unfortunately, Talisse did not want to be bogged down with definitions of democracy. Democracy as we know it has been organic since ancient days, and so that seemed a respectable stance to take. Yet, Talisse seems to fall into his own trap; he includes no description of what he takes democracy to mean for fear of being bridled, but then he seems to assume a fairly narrowly-conceived use of the term. In fact, he seems to equivocate democracy with liberalism, and anti-liberalism with opposition to democracy, from early on (p. 24). This has the unfortunate effect of making Talisse's political purposes transparent from the outset, and his political philosophy more rhetorical in nature as a result.
Similarly, Talisse bases his argument at other points of the book on deriving conceptual equivalences that are not only highly debatable, but often lack the logical flow that might have given him greater credibility. For instance, a social paradigm that gives priority to the community over the individual is not necessarily one that lacks a basis for equality or toleration. There may indeed be a good argument for this, but it is a premise that remains unsubstantiated through the text. In fact, many of Talisse's assumptions seem to be unobjective and ideological in nature. Thus, as he claims that "what is needed is a deliberative account of democracy that is not precommitted to liberal or antiliberal goals," (p.Read more ›
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Business & Investing > Economics > Economic Conditions
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics > History & Theory
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics > Political Parties
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Political Science > Political Doctrines
- Books > Professional & Technical > Accounting & Finance > Economics > Economic Conditions
- Books > Textbooks > Social Sciences > Political Science > Political History
- Books > Textbooks > Social Sciences > Political Science > Political Ideologies