Buy Used
CDN$ 3.53
+ CDN$ 6.49 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Our books ship from the USA and delivery time is 2 to 3 weeks.  Book has appearance of only minimal use. All pages are undamaged with no significant creases or tears. With pride from Motor City. All books guaranteed.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Dishonorable Passions Hardcover – May 6 2008

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
CDN$ 95.92 CDN$ 3.53

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child
click to open popover

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Viking USA (May 6 2008)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0670018627
  • ISBN-13: 978-0670018628
  • Product Dimensions: 16.3 x 4.4 x 24.5 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 612 g
  • Average Customer Review: Be the first to review this item
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #2,072,144 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

Product Description

From Publishers Weekly

Today's battle for same-sex marriage rights is only the latest step in the long struggle by lesbians and gay men to overturn a complex web of state laws banning nonreproductive sexual activity, often by heterosexuals as well as homosexuals. Laws against sodomy—or crimes against nature, as they were called by colonial lawmakers—were based on English common law emanating from Christian interpretations of a few biblical passages. The Supreme Court declared them unconstitutional in 2003. n this fascinating and engaging survey, Yale law professor Eskridge (Gay Marriage: For Better or for Worse?) charts not just the destructive history of those laws, but also the long, complex and often deeply contradictory history of how Americans thought about sex and the right to privacy. While clearly explaining the laws' origins and impact from colonial America through the 19th century, most of the book examines how, from the 1930s onward, sodomy laws increasingly became the legal tool by which homosexuals were denied jobs and even the right to public assembly. Interweaving legal discussion with personal stories and social history, Eskridge gives an incisive, panoramic view of America's (slowly) changing attitudes toward homosexuality, sexual tolerance and personal freedom. B&w photos. (May 5)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) HASH(0xa601a984) out of 5 stars 4 reviews
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa1688d08) out of 5 stars Toward Legal Sense on Sodomy Sept. 3 2008
By Rob Hardy - Published on
Format: Hardcover
To some Americans, it seems obvious that consenting adults should be able to have sex with whomever they want; to others, it seems obvious that such things should happen only in marriage. Not only should homosexuals not be sleeping together, say some in this latter group, but also if our laws don't restrict such activities, the homosexuals are going to be recruiting our children and who knows what else will happen. Theological and legal restrictions and punishments for sodomy go back for millennia, but American laws about sodomy came into their own in the nineteenth century, and have persisted, although they have recently lost much of their power to proscribe behavior. In _Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America 1861- 2003_ (Viking), William N. Eskridge Jr. has given a big and exhaustive history of such laws. A law professor himself, he filed an amicus brief for the judgement in _Lawrence vs. Texas_ whose 2003 date indicates it is the climax of his book. Eskridge documents a change in national legal philosophy whereby adult sexual activity was acknowledged to be best regulated by the conscience of those involved, and for many reasons is best left alone by the government.

Blackstone referred to "the infamous crime against nature" and this particular wording is well known. The nature of this particular crime, however, has always been vague, allowing the definition to be expanded as those in power wished. Eskridge shows how legislatures had to specifically incorporate fellatio or cunnilingus (and sometimes even masturbation) into sodomy laws if they wanted to prosecute such acts. Sometimes there was no allowance for being married, so that married couples who enjoyed oral or anal sex were breaking the law, although no state went after these particular miscreants. The new laws were seldom used, too, on unmarried heterosexual couples except for purposes of prosecuting prostitution, so that the laws against sodomy were in fact laws against homosexual behavior. In 1982 in Atlanta, Michael Hardwick was arrested for oral sex with another man, and local ACLU attorneys filed suit on his behalf. In 1985, the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia had acted properly. It was not until 2003 that the Supreme Court got a chance to change the decision. It was a more conservative court at that time, and the country had gone through a spell of politically powerful Christian conservatism. The most conservative members would have kept the sodomy laws in action in considering _Lawrence vs. Texas_, but they were in a 6 - 3 minority. It was yet another case in which police had conducted a search of questionable ethics and legality into the apartment of one John Lawrence, and found him in bed with another man. Justice Anthony Kennedy in his majority opinion wrote, "Bowers was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today."

Much of Eskridge's book is of legal analysis deeper than many layman will enjoy, but there are details here of the lives of, say, Bowers and Hardwick, and not just their legal cases. There are descriptions of lawyers on both sides of issues, and the judges who ruled on the cases, so that the book provides a picture of how the law works and how it has come to allow consensual sodomy today, while still capably prosecuting forced sex or sex upon minors. Given the subject, there are flashes of humor in what is otherwise a solidly serious tome. For instance, in the 1961 decriminalization debate in the Illinois capitol, one exasperated representative exclaimed that the only way sex would in the future be illegal in his state was "... if you're doing it on the front porch and blowing a bugle! And you can do it with either sex!" Eskridge notes that there was an embarrassed silence, and then bill for decriminalization was passed. All the battles are not now won; Eskridge writes, "The state can no longer legislate gay people as outlaws, but neither must it treat sexual variation as completely benign or neutral... The United States has not become a nation of moral liberals generally, and certainly not as regards homosexuals." The current controversies are over gay marriage or partnership agreements, and the controversies rage, but at least the era of legal persecution for the act of sodomy itself is over.
10 of 14 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa170f714) out of 5 stars An important but disturbing vision May 8 2008
By Wayne Dynes - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This is an important, but disturbing book. To be sure, it contains a great deal of useful information, distilled from the author's earlier studies. It is safe to say that no other author could do this with such authority and precision.

In his earlier published books Eskridge had seemed to ally himself with the radical gay faction. Now, it seems, he has morphed into something like a social conservative.

Eskridge believes that, even after our remarkable legal progress, gays are being held back by formidable reserves of disgust and fear of social pollution. These stark terms, for which he offers little documentation, seem to me to go too far. Still a mass of reservations, all the more persistent for not being (often) avowed, linger among the general public. As Eskridge puts it, many have not been able to bring themselves to acknowledge that homosexuality is a b e n i g n variation. We can have all the legal advances anyone could possibly require without achieving this.

In a pivotal sentence (p. 382) Eskridge makes the following point. "Lawrence [the 2003 Supreme Court decision] should . . . be understood as a challenge for gay people. Recalling an old-fashioned conception of citizenship as entailing obligations as well as freedoms, Lawrence should stir LGBT people to commit themselves to families, communities, and institutions (including religious ones) from which they have been alienated because of sodomy laws, social stigma, and other disabilities."

I readily confess that I am one of those who has been so alienated. I don't see why I should now have to commit myself to a family or a religious institution in order to secure my full civil rights. Still, I would agree that it would help if substantial numbers of gay and lesbian people did so.

But how much would it help? The disgust that homosexuality evokes is a product of several layers of experience and ideology. Ultimately, it is religiously based, since the Bible presents toleration of homosexual behavior as a danger to the body politic. (Yes, I know that John Boswell and others have sought to erase the sting of these texts. For most religious people, however, the sting persists.) Then a wave of psychotherapy crested fifty years ago. Even though most psychiatrists have changed their tune, the notion persists that same-sex behavior is somehow abnormal. Finally, there was the AIDS crisis. Drugs are helping a great many HIV people to lead productive and rewarding lives. And yet, allowing for some monocausal exaggeration, gay people are centrally implicated in this disease, and they will continue to be so perceived.

In short the likely scenario is that in the long term gay and lesbian people will experience a kind quasipariah status. The laws that have been holding us back will finally be abrogated. Vicious name calling, of the sort that prevailed until recently, will be unfashionable. But still, for the foreseeable future, "virtually normal" will be the best we can claim.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa15cfa80) out of 5 stars Good introduction to a growing topic in American policy Sept. 16 2012
By Newton Ooi - Published on
Of the great legal and social struggles in American history; gay rights is probably the last to come to fruition. In fact, over the course of the 20th century, as communities around the US were granting rights to women, racial minorities and even handicapped people, laws were being put in place that solidified discrimination against gays and lesbians. This book traces the evolution of social and legal norms regarding the treatment of homosexuals in America over the past 200 years. Interspersing legal cases with public policies enacted via referendum and legislation, the book is an engaging analysis of American mores, and how the majority's empathy for a minority within its midst ebbs back and forth over time, responding to the actions of private individuals and public figures. The author devotes a lot of text explaining the logic behind many of the legal cases, and how the parties in these cases arrived at these points in history. Sometimes long winded, the book does miss out on some key topics. For example, the author minimizes the impact of celebrities in promoting the acceptance of homosexuality. Whether it be Elton John, Liberace, or Ellen coming out on national TV, the author sees the struggle for gay rights as fought primarily in court-rooms, legislative offices and judges' chambers. This is unfortunate as the gay rights struggle is similar to the civil rights struggle in that both relied heavily on celebrities within the entertainment world to advance the cause. But overall, still a good book.
0 of 2 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa3150084) out of 5 stars Dishonorable Passionsin depth April 25 2013
By Jim Stimpfle - Published on
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
In depth review of sodomy laws state by state with court cases and cultural thinking every step of the way.