Dorian Hardcover – Jan 15 2003
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
From Publishers Weekly
In this retelling of Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, most of the original's characters are cleverly transmuted into their late-20th-century counterparts: dissolute Henry Wotton, now openly homosexual with a nasty heroin habit; his protege, eager young video artist "Baz" Hallward; and the title character, the quintessential amoral narcissist and a "seducer par excellence" (of men and, occasionally, women). In the summer of 1981, Hallward captures Gray's youth and beauty in a video installation that he titles "Cathode Narcissus." He and Wotton take Gray under their wing and school him in the ways of profligate London living, early '80s-style. By 1997, all three are HIV-positive, though Dorian, of course, shows no sign of illness. Self uses Wilde's plot to examine post-Stonewall gay life, from its drug-fueled hedonistic excesses to the reckoning of the AIDS epidemic. The novel skewers every layer of British society-street hustlers, members of Parliament and the idle rich. Real-life figures also appear, most notably the "princess of bulimia," Diana Spencer. The prose is laced with epigrammatic, lightly amusing pseudo-Wildean wit ("I want my sins to be like sushi-fresh, small and entirely raw," says Wotton), but its wordplay and evocation of debauchery also owe something to Evelyn Waugh and Martin Amis (channeling Hunter Thompson and Irvine Welsh). Self's mannered prose can grow tedious, and there's hardly a sympathetic character to be found, but the writer has undertaken-and largely succeeded in pulling off-a daring act of literary homage.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
To reimagine a classic work-especially when its author is the flamboyant and witty Oscar Wilde-is a daunting task, but Self (How the Dead Live) rises to the challenge. Upon its publication in 1891, The Picture of Dorian Gray shocked Victorian sensibilities. That Self's work will have a similar impact seems doubtful; as a society familiar with the works of Bret Easton Ellis, Thomas Harris, and Clive Barker, we have come too far, or, some may think, sunk too low. This is not to say, however, that Self has not done a masterly job of resetting the story in the era of AIDS, where Dorian's self-indulgent behavior proves to have a particularly devastating effect. The aristocratic Henry Wotton remains Dorian's decadent mentor and master of the bon mot. Baz Hallward remains hopelessly enamored of the Adonis-like young man, whom he talks into becoming the centerpiece for a video installation but for whom he remains an object of contempt. Alan Campbell and Lady Narborough are among the others reprised. Modern additions include Princess Di and the drug-dealing Ginger. Dorian's is a tale that allows Self to indulge his own penchant for word play, black humor, and uncomfortable imagery while continuing to explore the themes of sexual identity and social decadence. It is graphic and violent and definitely not everyone's cup of tea, but as an adaptive exercise it hits the mark. A story well suited to our times, this is recommended for larger public and most academic libraries.
David W. Henderson, Eckerd Coll. Lib., St. Petersburg, FL
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Top Customer Reviews
The punchline of the book offers some insights on the purpose, function, and effect of art. Besides that, the book is a tedious, torturous read (besides being gory to the point of swift apathy and desensitization.)
Self's voice is not only grating, but Self-congratulatory and Self-indulgent: he amuses himself with pointless, witless alliteration as often as his characters smoke, snort and shoot all kinds of hideous drug combinations. His treatment of his own characters is sadistic and completely lacking in affection.
The book is built around several mildly interesting comparisons with Wilde's original; the last, revealed in the epilogue, being the strongest. And yes, it's sort of interesting to compare 'moral corruption' with the transmission of a virus for which there is no cure. But his ideas lose all appeal thanks to the voices of the narrator and his aggravating flock of junkies (I speak French and I found the constant turd-like dropping of 'bons mots' infuriating; I can't imagine what it would be like for someone who can't understand them at all....)
Read the original and let your own imagination fit it to the context of the '80s and '90s.
We all know that any "good" embodiment of evil - as well as any good plot - is doomed to return sooner or later, which is why it should not come as a great surprise to see the return of Dorian Gray. As stunningly beautiful as ever, he is out haunting London and New York, inflicting his virus of death and corruption onto everyone he comes in contact with.
Will Self is honest enough to call his work an imitation, and it really is little more than that, which is both, the strength as well as the weakness of the book. Wilde's plot is, of course, ingenious, offering the reader a little bit of everything, including the tragic fall of its heroes, different moments of self-recognition, unrequited love, more or less outrageous erotic constellations, murder, a little touch of magic and so much more. It is therefore obvious, why Will Self has decided to stay true to the story-line and he does succeed in transposing these different elements and characters into the presence, giving them a new quality of authenticity and liveliness. At the same time, he keeps the reader entertained by involving him/her in a game of intertextual hide and seek, based on the activity of trying to identify by what name or in what shape certain characters or motifs of the original return in its new manifestation.
However, any game is destined to become tedious if the problems involved can be solved too easily and that is what happens when an imitation is too obviously linked to its model.Read more ›
"Dorian" failed for me on several counts. Self (who at his best is an imaginative writer) just could not match Wilde's wit: for example, Wilde's Henry Wotton is a much more witty character than Self's.
Wilde's novel had a certain Gothic horror underpinned by a subtle homosexual sub-plot (the latter necessarily so given the time it was written). Self, however, had no real need to allude to the homosexuality of his characters. Indeed, it's out there in the open, coupled with horror created by descriptions of AIDS and a sort of "American Psycho" sub-plot. No subtlety here then - quite the reverse. I felt that Self couldn't tear himself away from these themes. The trouble is that they weigh down the whole book, becoming tedious for the reader (or at least this one). That's not to belittle the fact that AIDS has had and continues to have a devasting effect, but I felt at times that Self was doing little more than indulging what I suspect might have been a fascination with descriptions of casual gay sex, cruising, SM bars and AIDS wards. When mixed together, they do not of themselves constitute an interesting novel.
This might be because Self's chosen plot pandered to his favourite themes. Within the first 50 pages of "Dorian", the reader is in familiar Self territory: drug abuse and hospitals. I couldn't help getting the immediate feeling of "here we go again". I suppose that continued descriptions of drug abuse in Self's writing have just worn me down. I just don't find it in the least bit interesting any more. I much prefer Self's writing when he holds these obessions in check, and lets his imagination explore different subjects/themes. "Dorian" was, I'm afraid, inferior both to Wilde and to Self's other work.
Most recent customer reviews
Other reviewers' complaints about this novel typically focus on what is graphically unpleasant about Self's depictions of his characters. Well, wake up. Read morePublished on March 7 2004
This novel is at best confusing but still intriguing. Most of the time you aren't quite sure what is happening, since the book has a tendency to jump around a bit. Read morePublished on Feb. 27 2004 by DJ_Bitter
Will Self's update of Oscar Wilde's "Dorian Gray" seems to be hardly worth the effort as he seems to try and offend everyone by bringing it into the age of AIDS. Read morePublished on May 6 2003 by Joseph J. Hanssen
I was surprised to find that this book was published in 2001. Much of it seems so dated: the glorification of the NY meat packing district, where sexual activity enters the realm... Read morePublished on April 9 2003 by MartinP