Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil MP3 CD – Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
|New from||Used from|
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
While living in Argentina in 1960, Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann was kidnapped and smuggled to Israel where he was put on trial for crimes against humanity. The New Yorker magazine sent Hannah Arendt to cover the trial. While covering the technical aspects of the trial, Arendt also explored the wider themes inherent in the trial, such as the nature of justice, the behavior of the Jewish leadership during the Nazi Régime, and, most controversially, the nature of Evil itself.
Far from being evil incarnate, as the prosecution painted Eichmann, Arendt maintains that he was an average man, a petty bureaucrat interested only in furthering his career, and the evil he did came from the seductive power of the totalitarian state and an unthinking adherence to the Nazi cause. Indeed, Eichmann's only defense during the trial was "I was just following orders."
Arendt's analysis of the seductive nature of evil is a disturbing one. We would like to think that anyone who would perpetrate such horror on the world is different from us, and that such atrocities are rarities in our world. But the history of groups such as the Jews, Kurds, Bosnians, and Native Americans, to name but a few, seems to suggest that such evil is all too commonplace. In revealing Eichmann as the pedestrian little man that he was, Arendt shows us that the veneer of civilization is a thin one indeed. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
"Narrator Wanda McCaddon brings a cultured British slant to the narrative, sometimes gently delivering various European accents while moving forward calmly and rationally." ---AudioFileSee all Product Description
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
Far from "defending" Eichmann, Arendt portrays him as a willing participant in mass murder, and, in her Epilogue, she strongly agrees with the death sentence that he received. The myth of Arendt's "defense" of Eichmann is a result of her belief that Eichmann was motivated more by immersion in the totalitarian "system" of Nazi Germany than by hatred of Jews. In no way does she excuse him or the Germans, and, indeed, she argues that complicity in the Holocaust was ubiquitous in Germany. Her thesis is certainly open to debate, but to suggest that this brave and decent thinker sought for a moment to defend Eichmann or the Nazis is outrageous. Her book remains one of the most thought-provoking studies of the perpetrators of the Holocaust ever written.
Arendt's book is a landmark in the workings of the Nazi machine that tortured, raped, and killed over 11 million Europeans for their religion, sexual orientation, political ideas, and nationality. However, the Eichmann trial centers more on the role Eichmann had in the "Final Solution" to the Jewish Question. Eichmann was charged with being a key player in the destruction and eradication of European Jewry.
The book and Arendt's theory regarding "the banality of evil" has created controversy since its inception in 1963. In 1963 Arendt was sent to Jerusalem to follow the Eichmann trial for The New Yorker. She published a series of articles over the course of the trial. It is often remarked by critics of the book that Arendt was not present for even half of the trial, yet the book is considered one of the principal books on the trial, if not the primary.Read more ›
As Arendt moves through the holocaust in the different countries in Western Europe and the Balkans, it becomes evident that the difference in degrees of the destruction of Jewry was not defined by the presence of potentially evil wrongdoers, but by the existence of individuals who would not put their conscience aside in order to further short-term goals. The contrast between the destruction of German Jews and the survival of the Jews of Bulgaria and Denmark can be directly traced to a commitment by the Bulgarians and Danes to save their fellow countrymen. The German Jews did not survive as the Danish and Bulgarian Jews did because Germany lacked such men of conscience.
It is easier to think of the chief architects and perpetrators of the attempted destruction of a whole people as madmen, the madder the better. Their acts can be rightfully condemned, but also understood, as evil things done by evil people. Furthermore, if the holocaust can be blamed on the acts of evil madmen, then it is also easier to believe that it could not have been prevented.Read more ›
When Arendt first saw Eichmann he struck her more as a clown than a monster. He thought in cliches, seemingly unable to have an original thought outside what was programed in him from party indoctrination (remind you of any of todays pols?). He was able to do his job good (coordinating trains and working with local officials) but he was unable to really think clearly or with any depth (though he did quote Kant which is no doubt more than what todays Bozos can do). He was just a career cog going thru his pathetic, self-absorbed motions - In the 90's he'd have been a real shining star at Enron.
These days we're constantly exposed to all the dogmatic posturing about "how it'll never happen again" (especially not in Europe) and yet it DID happen again between 91 and 95 in Bosnia (quarter of a million murders) while the Western world stood blindly by and the leader of the western world occupied himself with oval office "cigar parties"
And if you don't think morality can be relative consider this: Iran was the only country to act with resolve by shipping the Bosnians arms during those years. Now Iran is part of the "Evil axis"
In our lifelong quest to reconcile with evil, be it banal or absolute, and to understand the human condition, this book is a must...
Best of luck
Most recent customer reviews
A controversial book but an amazing one. I read it in conjunction with a much newer book "The EichmannTrial" by Deborah Lipstadt which helps put the whole controversy in... Read morePublished on June 17 2014 by Elaine Geddes
an in depth understanding into nazi ideology; i recommend having read something like the Nuremberg trials, and have a good historical understanding of the period before getting... Read morePublished on July 10 2013 by Salar
One of the greatest books I have ever read. After taking a Holocaust course , no book compared to this on its information, Ms. Read morePublished on July 3 2005
Trial of the Century
Before there was the O.J. Simpson double homicide trial there was the Eichmann trial. Read more
A lot has been written and said about the Holocaust. This small book by a respected philosopher about the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem is the largest and most thought provoking... Read morePublished on Feb. 5 2002 by Luciano Lupini
Hannah Arendt's book is a powerful and disturbing account of the trial of Adolf Eichmann, and the subtitle, A Report on the Banality of Evil, couldn't be more apt. According to Ms. Read morePublished on Dec 18 2001
Over the last 15 years, I have often come across references to Hannah Arendt when reading about the Holocaust, but only recently did I read "Eichmann in Jerusalem". Read morePublished on Aug. 21 2001
I first read this book 20+ years ago in my senior year of college, in a political theory seminar on Arendt, and have re-read it from time to time ever since. Read morePublished on July 24 2001 by Annie