- You'll save an extra 5% on Books purchased from Amazon.ca, now through July 29th. No code necessary, discount applied at checkout. Here's how (restrictions apply)
The Fluoride Wars: How a Modest Public Health Measure Became America's Longest Running Political Melodrama Hardcover – Apr 20 2009
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
"The authors have put an enormous effort into acquiring the data in this book and... it is a very interesting and stimulating read." (Chromatographia, June 2010)
“The authors should be commended for providing all of the facts of the controversy in one place. Their call for both sides to get together to study the health issues with reason and respect is also a worthwhile goal because, as they point out; perhaps then ‘this long-standing and somewhat silly dispute could finally he laid to rest.’” (Chemical and Engineering News, September 2009)
About the Author
R. Allan Freeze is one of North America's leading researchers in the field of environmental water quality, and has acted as the consulting engineer on drinking water quality at a number of sites across North America. He was a member of the University of British Columbia's engineering faculty in Vancouver for twenty years and is the author of over 150 technical articles and the coauthor of several books.
Jay H. Lehr is Senior Scientist with The Heartland Institute and Chief Scientist for EarthWater Global, an international water supply company. A graduate of Princeton University, he developed the first PhD program in hydrology at the University of Arizona and was on the faculty at The Ohio State University. Lehr has authored or coauthored over twenty books, hundreds of journal and magazine articles, and is an internationally renowned expert who speaks worldwide on environmental topics.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
The fluoridation debate was in full swing in the 1950s and continues today in much the same form, with the same sorts of claims and counter-claims. Scientifically, the debate has always been one-sided, with an overwhelming majority of dentists and doctors supporting fluoridation but with a significant minority of critics.
The remarkable persistence of the debate has attracted the attention of social analysts. Attempting to take a middle ground is a perilous enterprise, because the partisans on either side are likely to either adopt a contributor as an ally or attack him or her as an enemy.
Scientists R. Allan Freeze and Jay H. Lehr have boldly entered the fluoridation arena with The Fluoride Wars. Their ambitious aim is to provide a balanced social history of the U.S. controversy. They tackle the major issues in the debate, including arguments over benefits of fluoridation and alleged adverse health impacts such as allergies, cancer, and skeletal fluorosis. They give special attention to dental fluorosis, the staining of teeth due to excess fluoride, typically said by proponents to be of only cosmetic significance but seen by opponents as a sign of fluoride toxicity.
A major contribution of the book is its covering of key developments in recent decades, including the antifluoride position of scientists from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the debate among proponents about whether there is too much fluoride in people's diets, the switch by a few proponents to become opponents, the discrediting of some antifluoride claims, and the support for fluoridation by U.S. courts.
Freeze and Lehr also address the social dynamics of the debate, looking at referenda and statewide implementation measures and commenting on explanations of forces driving the proponents and the opponents. All in all, this is the most comprehensive treatment of the debate available in the literature. It draws on key sources, scientific, sociological, and historical.
Several episodes are given detailed treatment, for example, the first trials in which fluoride was added to town water supplies in the 1940s. The historical detail is not a sustained narrative but more like an occasional highlight, with some irrelevant digressions, such as a lengthy account of the Jonestown massacre, included because it had a deep effect on a key legislative promoter of fluoridation in California.
Freeze and Lehr are sufficiently even-handed that their treatment will please neither side in the debate. The book, though, is not a purely dispassionate account because, as well as discussing the scientific and political issues, the authors want to pass judgment and, in doing so, they often shift from nonpartisan social description to summary judgment that can seem to sweep aside disagreement. In particular, they sum up the debate as if it were a matter only of science and of benefits versus costs. The book is more an assessment of arguments than a social history.
The Fluoride Wars is almost entirely about fluoridation in the United States. The authors mention the situation in other countries but do not pursue the implications of fluoridation outcomes elsewhere. They conclude that popular opposition to fluoridation in the United States is due to risk aversion in referenda, but this does not explain the near absence of fluoridation in Europe, where governments make the decisions.
Freeze and Lehr sometimes make sweeping references to proponents or opponents, attributing the views of a few to an entire movement. Their language is frequently flamboyant and occasionally dismissive, for example in referring to scientist opponents as "zealously committed" (p. 362)--and less commonly labeling proponent scientists in a similar way.
The Fluoride Wars concludes with an appeal for the two warring sides to sit down and talk. Although this suggestion almost certainly will be ignored, Freeze and Lehr have set an admirable example of measured analysis and stimulating writing.
University of Wollongong, Australia
(This review appeared in the Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Vol. 84, 2010, pp. 314-315)
The book is clearly written and for the most part, entertainingly presented. It does an impressive job of reviewing the history of the politics of fluoridation, as well as the health science associated with the issue. It is by no means a screed against the anti-fluoridation movement. In fact, the authors bend over backwards to give the "anti" arguments their due. But in the end, an assessment of the fluoride controversy has to center on science, not on conspiracy theories or paranoid claims based on just enough knowledge to get it all wrong. Highly recommended.
I didn't think that the book chose one side or another - and then I read the first reviews. Interestingly, some of the people who gave the book unfavorable reviews are all strong opposers of fluoride who's organizations and arguments are covered in the book.
It's an interesting conflict - covering the controversy of fluoridation (which I didn't realize was a controversy until I read this) - including the almost universal support from the medical-dental establishment, as well as the effective and street-smart strategies of a well-organized opposition.
Fluoride is a double-edged sword. The authors conclude that public water fluoridation, together with the advent of fluoridated toothpaste, are undoubtedly responsible for the precipitous drop in the incidence of childhood dental cavities. But they also join the call for reduced fluoride dosages in public supplies to protect against the threat of negative bone health impacts.
"The Flouride Wars" discusses the heated conflict between the pro-fluoride and anti-fluoride camps. Nothing makes this case more clearly than the first reviews posted on Amazon.com by some of the leaders of the antiflouridation movement in America.
It's definitely a "war" that makes for an interesting read. I don't want a book to make decisions for me, I want it to present both sides honestly. Open-minded readers will find balanced coverage of this long-standing controversy so they can make their own decisions.
Known members of the pro tooth decay faction have given this book one star ratings. However, what the authors discovered in their research, especially the tactics, also apply to those to oppose vaccinations, global warming/climate change or any other science based issue.
I think it would be great reading for High School or College level science class students.
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Medical Books > Administration & Medicine Economics > Health Care Delivery
- Books > Medical Books > Administration & Medicine Economics > Public Health
- Books > Medical Books > Dentistry > Preventive
- Books > Medical Books > History
- Books > Medical Books > Medicine > Preventive Medicine
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Political Science > Public Policy
- Books > Professional & Technical > Engineering > Civil > Environmental
- Books > Science & Math > History & Philosophy > History of Medicine
- Books > Science & Math > History & Philosophy > History of Technology
- Books > Science & Math > Medicine > Administration & Policy > Health Care Delivery
- Books > Science & Math > Medicine > Administration & Policy > Public Health
- Books > Science & Math > Medicine > Dentistry > Preventive
- Books > Science & Math > Medicine > Specialties > Preventive Medicine
- Books > Textbooks > Medicine > Administration & Policy > Public Health
- Books > Textbooks > Medicine > Medicine > Special Topics > History
- Books > Textbooks > Social Sciences > Political Science > Public Policy