Have one to sell?
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Guns of August: The Pulitzer Prize-Winning Classic About the Outbreak of World War I Mass Market Paperback – Illustrated, Aug. 3 2004
by
Barbara W. Tuchman
(Author)
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Paperback, Illustrated
"Please retry" | $17.47 | $15.42 |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
—
| $66.00 | $32.24 |
- Kindle Edition
$9.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial - Hardcover
$216.074 Used from $89.89 2 New from $216.07 - Paperback
$26.7324 Used from $15.42 19 New from $17.47 - Mass Market Paperback
$11.8716 Used from $9.47 14 New from $11.87 - MP3 CD
from $32.241 Used from $32.24 1 New from $66.00
Enhance your purchase
Selected by the Modern Library as one of the 100 best nonfiction books of all time
The Proud Tower, the Pulitzer Prize–winning The Guns of August, and The Zimmerman Telegram comprise Barbara W. Tuchman’s classic histories of the First World War era
In this landmark, Pulitzer Prize–winning account, renowned historian Barbara W. Tuchman re-creates the first month of World War I: thirty days in the summer of 1914 that determined the course of the conflict, the century, and ultimately our present world. Beginning with the funeral of Edward VII, Tuchman traces each step that led to the inevitable clash. And inevitable it was, with all sides plotting their war for a generation. Dizzyingly comprehensive and spectacularly portrayed with her famous talent for evoking the characters of the war’s key players, Tuchman’s magnum opusis a classic for the ages.
Praise for The Guns of August
“A brilliant piece of military history which proves up to the hilt the force of Winston Churchill’s statement that the first month of World War I was ‘a drama never surpassed.’”—Newsweek
“More dramatic than fiction . . . a magnificent narrative—beautifully organized, elegantly phrased, skillfully paced and sustained.”—Chicago Tribune
“A fine demonstration that with sufficient art rather specialized history can be raised to the level of literature.”—The New York Times
“[The Guns of August] has a vitality that transcends its narrative virtues, which are considerable, and its feel for characterizations, which is excellent.”—The Wall Street Journal
From the Trade Paperback edition.
The Proud Tower, the Pulitzer Prize–winning The Guns of August, and The Zimmerman Telegram comprise Barbara W. Tuchman’s classic histories of the First World War era
In this landmark, Pulitzer Prize–winning account, renowned historian Barbara W. Tuchman re-creates the first month of World War I: thirty days in the summer of 1914 that determined the course of the conflict, the century, and ultimately our present world. Beginning with the funeral of Edward VII, Tuchman traces each step that led to the inevitable clash. And inevitable it was, with all sides plotting their war for a generation. Dizzyingly comprehensive and spectacularly portrayed with her famous talent for evoking the characters of the war’s key players, Tuchman’s magnum opusis a classic for the ages.
Praise for The Guns of August
“A brilliant piece of military history which proves up to the hilt the force of Winston Churchill’s statement that the first month of World War I was ‘a drama never surpassed.’”—Newsweek
“More dramatic than fiction . . . a magnificent narrative—beautifully organized, elegantly phrased, skillfully paced and sustained.”—Chicago Tribune
“A fine demonstration that with sufficient art rather specialized history can be raised to the level of literature.”—The New York Times
“[The Guns of August] has a vitality that transcends its narrative virtues, which are considerable, and its feel for characterizations, which is excellent.”—The Wall Street Journal
From the Trade Paperback edition.
- Print length640 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPresidio Press
- Publication dateAug. 3 2004
- Dimensions10.54 x 2.54 x 17.53 cm
- ISBN-100345476093
- ISBN-13978-0345476098
- Lexile measure1350L
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Product description
Review
“A brilliant piece of military history which proves up to the hilt the force of Winston Churchill’s statement that the first month of World War I was ‘a drama never surpassed.’”—Newsweek
“More dramatic than fiction . . . a magnificent narrative—beautifully organized, elegantly phrased, skillfully paced and sustained.”—Chicago Tribune
“A fine demonstration that with sufficient art rather specialized history can be raised to the level of literature.”—The New York Times
“[The Guns of August] has a vitality that transcends its narrative virtues, which are considerable, and its feel for characterizations, which is excellent.”—The Wall Street Journal
“More dramatic than fiction . . . a magnificent narrative—beautifully organized, elegantly phrased, skillfully paced and sustained.”—Chicago Tribune
“A fine demonstration that with sufficient art rather specialized history can be raised to the level of literature.”—The New York Times
“[The Guns of August] has a vitality that transcends its narrative virtues, which are considerable, and its feel for characterizations, which is excellent.”—The Wall Street Journal
From the Back Cover
“Fascinating . . . One of the finest works of history written . . . A splendid and glittering performance.”
–The New York Times
“MORE DRAMATIC THAN FICTION . . . A MAGNIFICENT NARRATIVE . . . elegantly phrased, skillfully paced and sustained . . . The product of painstaking and sophisticated research.”
–Chicago Tribune
“A BRILLIANT PIECE OF MILITARY HISTORY which proves up to the hilt the force of Winston Churchill’s statement that the first month of World War I was ‘a drama never surpassed.’ A writer with an impeccable sense of telling detail, Mrs. Tuchman is able to evoke both the enormous pattern of the tragedy and the minutiae which make it human.”
–Newsweek
“[A] BEAUTIFULLY ORGANIZED, COMPELLING NARRATIVE.”
–San Francisco Chronicle
“AN EPIC NEVER FLAGGING IN SUSPENSE . . . It seemed hardly possible that anything new of significance could be said about the prelude to and the first month of World War I. But this is exactly what Mrs. Tuchman has succeeded in doing . . . by transforming the drama’s protagonists as well as its immense supporting cast, from half-legendary and half shadowy figures into full-dimensional, believable persons.”
–The Christian Science Monitor
“EXCELLENT . . . [The Guns of August] has a vitality that transcends its narrative virtues.”
–The Wall Street Journal
–The New York Times
“MORE DRAMATIC THAN FICTION . . . A MAGNIFICENT NARRATIVE . . . elegantly phrased, skillfully paced and sustained . . . The product of painstaking and sophisticated research.”
–Chicago Tribune
“A BRILLIANT PIECE OF MILITARY HISTORY which proves up to the hilt the force of Winston Churchill’s statement that the first month of World War I was ‘a drama never surpassed.’ A writer with an impeccable sense of telling detail, Mrs. Tuchman is able to evoke both the enormous pattern of the tragedy and the minutiae which make it human.”
–Newsweek
“[A] BEAUTIFULLY ORGANIZED, COMPELLING NARRATIVE.”
–San Francisco Chronicle
“AN EPIC NEVER FLAGGING IN SUSPENSE . . . It seemed hardly possible that anything new of significance could be said about the prelude to and the first month of World War I. But this is exactly what Mrs. Tuchman has succeeded in doing . . . by transforming the drama’s protagonists as well as its immense supporting cast, from half-legendary and half shadowy figures into full-dimensional, believable persons.”
–The Christian Science Monitor
“EXCELLENT . . . [The Guns of August] has a vitality that transcends its narrative virtues.”
–The Wall Street Journal
About the Author
Barbara W. Tuchman (1912–1989) achieved prominence as a historian with The Zimmermann Telegram and international fame with The Guns of August—a huge bestseller and winner of the Pulitzer Prize. Her other works include Bible and Sword, The Proud Tower, Stilwell and the American Experience in China (for which Tuchman was awarded a second Pulitzer Prize), Notes from China, A Distant Mirror, Practicing History, The March of Folly, and The First Salute.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
1
A Funeral
So gorgeous was the spectacle on the May morning of 1910 when nine kings rode in the funeral of Edward VII of England that the crowd, waiting in hushed and black-clad awe, could not keep back gasps of admiration. In scarlet and blue and green and purple, three by three the sovereigns rode through the palace gates, with plumed helmets, gold braid, crimson sashes, and jeweled orders flashing in the sun. After them came five heirs apparent, forty more imperial or royal highnesses, seven queens—four dowager and three regnant—and a scattering of special ambassadors from uncrowned countries. Together they represented seventy nations in the greatest assemblage of royalty and rank ever gathered in one place and, of its kind, the last. The muffled tongue of Big Ben tolled nine by the clock as the cortege left the palace, but on history’s clock it was sunset, and the sun of the old world was setting in a dying blaze of splendor never to be seen again.
In the center of the front row rode the new king, George V, flanked on his left by the Duke of Connaught, the late king’s only surviving brother, and on his right by a personage to whom, acknowledged The Times, “belongs the first place among all the foreign mourners,” who “even when relations are most strained has never lost his popularity amongst us”—William II, the German Emperor. Mounted on a gray horse, wearing the scarlet uniform of a British Field Marshal, carrying the baton of that rank, the Kaiser had composed his features behind the famous upturned mustache in an expression “grave even to severity.” Of the several emotions churning his susceptible breast, some hints exist in his letters. “I am proud to call this place my home and to be a member of this royal family,” he wrote home after spending the night in Windsor Castle in the former apartments of his mother. Sentiment and nostalgia induced by these melancholy occasions with his English relatives jostled with pride in his supremacy among the assembled potentates and with a fierce relish in the disappearance of his uncle from the European scene. He had come to bury Edward his bane; Edward the arch plotter, as William conceived it, of Germany’s encirclement; Edward his mother’s brother whom he could neither bully nor impress, whose fat figure cast a shadow between Germany and the sun. “He is Satan. You cannot imagine what a Satan he is!”
This verdict, announced by the Kaiser before a dinner of three hundred guests in Berlin in 1907, was occasioned by one of Edward’s continental tours undertaken with clearly diabolical designs at encirclement. He had spent a provocative week in Paris, visited for no good reason the King of Spain (who had just married his niece), and finished with a visit to the King of Italy with obvious intent to seduce him from his Triple Alliance with Germany and Austria. The Kaiser, possessor of the least inhibited tongue in Europe, had worked himself into a frenzy ending in another of those comments that had periodically over the past twenty years of his reign shattered the nerves of diplomats.
Happily the Encircler was now dead and replaced by George who, the Kaiser told Theodore Roosevelt a few days before the funeral, was “a very nice boy” (of forty-five, six years younger than the Kaiser). “He is a thorough Englishman and hates all foreigners but I do not mind that as long as he does not hate Germans more than other foreigners.” Alongside George, William now rode confidently, saluting as he passed the regimental colors of the 1st Royal Dragoons of which he was honorary colonel. Once he had distributed photographs of himself wearing their uniform with the Delphic inscription written above his signature, “I bide my time.” Today his time had come; he was supreme in Europe.
Behind him rode the widowed Queen Alexandra’s two brothers, King Frederick of Denmark and King George of the Hellenes; her nephew, King Haakon of Norway; and three kings who were to lose their thrones: Alfonso of Spain, Manuel of Portugal and, wearing a silk turban, King Ferdinand of Bulgaria who annoyed his fellow sovereigns by calling himself Czar and kept in a chest a Byzantine Emperor’s full regalia, acquired from a theatrical costumer, against the day when he should reassemble the Byzantine dominions beneath his scepter.
Dazzled by these “splendidly mounted princes,” as The Times called them, few observers had eyes for the ninth king, the only one among them who was to achieve greatness as a man. Despite his great height and perfect horsemanship, Albert, King of the Belgians, who disliked the pomp of royal ceremony, contrived in that company to look both embarrassed and absentminded. He was then thirty-five and had been on the throne barely a year. In later years when his face became known to the world as a symbol of heroism and tragedy, it still always wore that abstracted look, as if his mind were on something else.
The future source of tragedy, tall, corpulent, and corseted, with green plumes waving from his helmet, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir of the old Emperor Franz Josef, rode on Albert’s right, and on his left another scion who would never reach his throne, Prince Yussuf, heir of the Sultan of Turkey. After the kings came the royal highnesses: Prince Fushimi, brother of the Emperor of Japan; Grand Duke Michael, brother of the Czar of Russia; the Duke of Aosta in bright blue with green plumes, brother of the King of Italy; Prince Carl, brother of the King of Sweden; Prince Henry, consort of the Queen of Holland; and the Crown Princes of Serbia, Rumania, and Montenegro. The last named, Prince Danilo, “an amiable, extremely handsome young man of delightful manners,” resembled the Merry Widow’s lover in more than name, for, to the consternation of British functionaries, he had arrived the night before accompanied by a “charming young lady of great personal attractions” whom he introduced as his wife’s lady in waiting with the explanation that she had come to London to do some shopping.
A regiment of minor German royalty followed: rulers of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Waldeck-Pyrmont, Saxe-Coburg Gotha, of Saxony, Hesse, Württemberg, Baden, and Bavaria, of whom the last, Crown Prince Rupprecht, was soon to lead a German army in battle. There were a Prince of Siam, a Prince of Persia, five princes of the former French royal house of Orléans, a brother of the Khedive of Egypt wearing a gold-tasseled fez, Prince Tsia-tao of China in an embroidered light-blue gown whose ancient dynasty had two more years to run, and the Kaiser’s brother, Prince Henry of Prussia, representing the German Navy, of which he was Commander in Chief. Amid all this magnificence were three civilian-coated gentlemen, M. Gaston-Carlin of Switzerland, M. Pichon, Foreign Minister of France, and former President Theodore Roosevelt, special envoy of the United States.
Edward, the object of this unprecedented gathering of nations, was often called the “Uncle of Europe,” a title which, insofar as Europe’s ruling houses were meant, could be taken literally. He was the uncle not only of Kaiser Wilhelm but also, through his wife’s sister, the Dowager Empress Marie of Russia, of Czar Nicolas II. His own niece Alix was the Czarina; his daughter Maud was Queen of Norway; another niece, Ena, was Queen of Spain; a third niece, Marie, was soon to be Queen of Rumania. The Danish family of his wife, besides occupying the throne of Denmark, had mothered the Czar of Russia and supplied kings to Greece and Norway. Other relatives, the progeny at various removes of Queen Victoria’s nine sons and daughters, were scattered in abundance throughout the courts of Europe.
Yet not family feeling alone nor even the suddenness and shock of Edward’s death—for to public knowledge he had been ill one day and dead the next—accounted for the unexpected flood of condolences at his passing. It was in fact a tribute to Edward’s great gifts as a sociable king which had proved invaluable to his country. In the nine short years of his reign England’s splendid isolation had given way, under pressure, to a series of “understandings” or attachments, but not quite alliances—for England dislikes the definitive—with two old enemies, France and Russia, and one promising new power, Japan. The resulting shift in balance registered itself around the world and affected every state’s relations with every other. Though Edward neither initiated nor influenced his country’s policy, his personal diplomacy helped to make the change possible.
Taken as a child to visit France, he had said to Napoleon III: “You have a nice country. I would like to be your son.” This preference for things French, in contrast to or perhaps in protest against his mother’s for the Germanic, lasted, and after her death was put to use. When England, growing edgy over the challenge implicit in Germany’s Naval Program of 1900, decided to patch up old quarrels with France, Edward’s talents as Roi Charmeur smoothed the way. In 1903 he went to Paris, disregarding advice that an official state visit would find a cold welcome. On his arrival the crowds were sullen and silent except for a few taunting cries of “Vivent les Boers!” and “Vive Fashoda!” which the King ignored. To a worried aide who muttered, “The French don’t like us,” he replied, “Why should they?” and continued bowing and smiling from his carriage.
A Funeral
So gorgeous was the spectacle on the May morning of 1910 when nine kings rode in the funeral of Edward VII of England that the crowd, waiting in hushed and black-clad awe, could not keep back gasps of admiration. In scarlet and blue and green and purple, three by three the sovereigns rode through the palace gates, with plumed helmets, gold braid, crimson sashes, and jeweled orders flashing in the sun. After them came five heirs apparent, forty more imperial or royal highnesses, seven queens—four dowager and three regnant—and a scattering of special ambassadors from uncrowned countries. Together they represented seventy nations in the greatest assemblage of royalty and rank ever gathered in one place and, of its kind, the last. The muffled tongue of Big Ben tolled nine by the clock as the cortege left the palace, but on history’s clock it was sunset, and the sun of the old world was setting in a dying blaze of splendor never to be seen again.
In the center of the front row rode the new king, George V, flanked on his left by the Duke of Connaught, the late king’s only surviving brother, and on his right by a personage to whom, acknowledged The Times, “belongs the first place among all the foreign mourners,” who “even when relations are most strained has never lost his popularity amongst us”—William II, the German Emperor. Mounted on a gray horse, wearing the scarlet uniform of a British Field Marshal, carrying the baton of that rank, the Kaiser had composed his features behind the famous upturned mustache in an expression “grave even to severity.” Of the several emotions churning his susceptible breast, some hints exist in his letters. “I am proud to call this place my home and to be a member of this royal family,” he wrote home after spending the night in Windsor Castle in the former apartments of his mother. Sentiment and nostalgia induced by these melancholy occasions with his English relatives jostled with pride in his supremacy among the assembled potentates and with a fierce relish in the disappearance of his uncle from the European scene. He had come to bury Edward his bane; Edward the arch plotter, as William conceived it, of Germany’s encirclement; Edward his mother’s brother whom he could neither bully nor impress, whose fat figure cast a shadow between Germany and the sun. “He is Satan. You cannot imagine what a Satan he is!”
This verdict, announced by the Kaiser before a dinner of three hundred guests in Berlin in 1907, was occasioned by one of Edward’s continental tours undertaken with clearly diabolical designs at encirclement. He had spent a provocative week in Paris, visited for no good reason the King of Spain (who had just married his niece), and finished with a visit to the King of Italy with obvious intent to seduce him from his Triple Alliance with Germany and Austria. The Kaiser, possessor of the least inhibited tongue in Europe, had worked himself into a frenzy ending in another of those comments that had periodically over the past twenty years of his reign shattered the nerves of diplomats.
Happily the Encircler was now dead and replaced by George who, the Kaiser told Theodore Roosevelt a few days before the funeral, was “a very nice boy” (of forty-five, six years younger than the Kaiser). “He is a thorough Englishman and hates all foreigners but I do not mind that as long as he does not hate Germans more than other foreigners.” Alongside George, William now rode confidently, saluting as he passed the regimental colors of the 1st Royal Dragoons of which he was honorary colonel. Once he had distributed photographs of himself wearing their uniform with the Delphic inscription written above his signature, “I bide my time.” Today his time had come; he was supreme in Europe.
Behind him rode the widowed Queen Alexandra’s two brothers, King Frederick of Denmark and King George of the Hellenes; her nephew, King Haakon of Norway; and three kings who were to lose their thrones: Alfonso of Spain, Manuel of Portugal and, wearing a silk turban, King Ferdinand of Bulgaria who annoyed his fellow sovereigns by calling himself Czar and kept in a chest a Byzantine Emperor’s full regalia, acquired from a theatrical costumer, against the day when he should reassemble the Byzantine dominions beneath his scepter.
Dazzled by these “splendidly mounted princes,” as The Times called them, few observers had eyes for the ninth king, the only one among them who was to achieve greatness as a man. Despite his great height and perfect horsemanship, Albert, King of the Belgians, who disliked the pomp of royal ceremony, contrived in that company to look both embarrassed and absentminded. He was then thirty-five and had been on the throne barely a year. In later years when his face became known to the world as a symbol of heroism and tragedy, it still always wore that abstracted look, as if his mind were on something else.
The future source of tragedy, tall, corpulent, and corseted, with green plumes waving from his helmet, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir of the old Emperor Franz Josef, rode on Albert’s right, and on his left another scion who would never reach his throne, Prince Yussuf, heir of the Sultan of Turkey. After the kings came the royal highnesses: Prince Fushimi, brother of the Emperor of Japan; Grand Duke Michael, brother of the Czar of Russia; the Duke of Aosta in bright blue with green plumes, brother of the King of Italy; Prince Carl, brother of the King of Sweden; Prince Henry, consort of the Queen of Holland; and the Crown Princes of Serbia, Rumania, and Montenegro. The last named, Prince Danilo, “an amiable, extremely handsome young man of delightful manners,” resembled the Merry Widow’s lover in more than name, for, to the consternation of British functionaries, he had arrived the night before accompanied by a “charming young lady of great personal attractions” whom he introduced as his wife’s lady in waiting with the explanation that she had come to London to do some shopping.
A regiment of minor German royalty followed: rulers of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Strelitz, Waldeck-Pyrmont, Saxe-Coburg Gotha, of Saxony, Hesse, Württemberg, Baden, and Bavaria, of whom the last, Crown Prince Rupprecht, was soon to lead a German army in battle. There were a Prince of Siam, a Prince of Persia, five princes of the former French royal house of Orléans, a brother of the Khedive of Egypt wearing a gold-tasseled fez, Prince Tsia-tao of China in an embroidered light-blue gown whose ancient dynasty had two more years to run, and the Kaiser’s brother, Prince Henry of Prussia, representing the German Navy, of which he was Commander in Chief. Amid all this magnificence were three civilian-coated gentlemen, M. Gaston-Carlin of Switzerland, M. Pichon, Foreign Minister of France, and former President Theodore Roosevelt, special envoy of the United States.
Edward, the object of this unprecedented gathering of nations, was often called the “Uncle of Europe,” a title which, insofar as Europe’s ruling houses were meant, could be taken literally. He was the uncle not only of Kaiser Wilhelm but also, through his wife’s sister, the Dowager Empress Marie of Russia, of Czar Nicolas II. His own niece Alix was the Czarina; his daughter Maud was Queen of Norway; another niece, Ena, was Queen of Spain; a third niece, Marie, was soon to be Queen of Rumania. The Danish family of his wife, besides occupying the throne of Denmark, had mothered the Czar of Russia and supplied kings to Greece and Norway. Other relatives, the progeny at various removes of Queen Victoria’s nine sons and daughters, were scattered in abundance throughout the courts of Europe.
Yet not family feeling alone nor even the suddenness and shock of Edward’s death—for to public knowledge he had been ill one day and dead the next—accounted for the unexpected flood of condolences at his passing. It was in fact a tribute to Edward’s great gifts as a sociable king which had proved invaluable to his country. In the nine short years of his reign England’s splendid isolation had given way, under pressure, to a series of “understandings” or attachments, but not quite alliances—for England dislikes the definitive—with two old enemies, France and Russia, and one promising new power, Japan. The resulting shift in balance registered itself around the world and affected every state’s relations with every other. Though Edward neither initiated nor influenced his country’s policy, his personal diplomacy helped to make the change possible.
Taken as a child to visit France, he had said to Napoleon III: “You have a nice country. I would like to be your son.” This preference for things French, in contrast to or perhaps in protest against his mother’s for the Germanic, lasted, and after her death was put to use. When England, growing edgy over the challenge implicit in Germany’s Naval Program of 1900, decided to patch up old quarrels with France, Edward’s talents as Roi Charmeur smoothed the way. In 1903 he went to Paris, disregarding advice that an official state visit would find a cold welcome. On his arrival the crowds were sullen and silent except for a few taunting cries of “Vivent les Boers!” and “Vive Fashoda!” which the King ignored. To a worried aide who muttered, “The French don’t like us,” he replied, “Why should they?” and continued bowing and smiling from his carriage.
Start reading The Guns of August on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Presidio Press; Illustrated edition (Aug. 3 2004)
- Language : English
- Mass Market Paperback : 640 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0345476093
- ISBN-13 : 978-0345476098
- Item weight : 308 g
- Dimensions : 10.54 x 2.54 x 17.53 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: #17,845 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #8 in U.S. History of World War I
- #9 in World War I (Books)
- #19 in Historical Reference (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
3,200 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in Canada on March 20, 2019
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I simply got engrossed with this book. It covers such a short period of time but such an eventful moment in history. Everyone associates trenches and static lines with ww1 but the opening of the conflict was incredibly dynamic. Tuchman writes in a very engaging way, bringing out the personalities of the many players in the events, covering the troop movements as well as individual moments brilliantly. Recommended highly for anyone interested in the conflict as a great introduction. Probably the most engaging war history I've read that wasn't a memoir.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
A gripping account of the early days of WW1. Highly recommend even if you are not into military history.
Reviewed in Canada on October 10, 2015Verified Purchase
I think the first question that many people might ask when considering this book is why read about a war that happened over a century ago? I think there are many reasons:
1) the defeat of Germany and the onerous reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles contributed to German discontent and resentment against the victorious European powers and helped form a climate in Germany which allowed Nazism to thrive and flourish culminating in Hitler and the Second World War;
2) The strains of Russia's war comittment helped pushed her over the precipice into the Communist Revolution;
3) The collapse of the Ottoman Empire that had ruled the Middle East for centuries.
In many ways these events are still reverberating through the world today as we watch Putin push for power in the Ukraine and now Syria in attempts to regain the glory of Soviet Union and Imperial Russia. The divying up of the Middle East following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the end of WWI was more about preserving European interest's in the region than respecting ethnic or religious de facto boundaries as we now watch this region collapse in chaos and failed states.
But perhaps most importantly, the conventional political and military wisdom of the day as Tuchman so aptly recounts was that the world could not survive a long drawn out war and victory would be a achieved through a decisive, offensive battle (We'll be home by Christmas") when we now know the tragic reality that WW1 was a 4 year bloody defensive war where millions lost their lives. I think we should keep this all in mind when the "talking heads" on television relate the "conventional wisdom" about what to do with the Ukraine, Syria, Iran etc.
It is inevitable to compare Tuchman's Guns of August to Margaret McMillain's also excellent account of WW1 - The War that ended Peace. Both Tuchman and McMillian are very good at capturing the personalities of the key political and military figures of the day that had decisive influence on the events that lead Europe on the path to war.
Personally, I found McMillian took a longer viewpoint and was better at analyzing and explaining the military strategies and the international political pressures in response to the central question of her book which was was there a point in time at which the seemingly inevitable march to war could be stopped? Tuchman dived down into the nitty gritty. In particular, she excelled at (surprisingly) gripping and suspenseful accounts of the early battles of August, capturing the chaos, the incompetency; the incredible courage and horrors of war - culminating in the Battle of the Marne, which as she puts did not end the war but allowed the war to continue on for another tragic 4 years.
Highly recommend - even if you are not into military history.
1) the defeat of Germany and the onerous reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles contributed to German discontent and resentment against the victorious European powers and helped form a climate in Germany which allowed Nazism to thrive and flourish culminating in Hitler and the Second World War;
2) The strains of Russia's war comittment helped pushed her over the precipice into the Communist Revolution;
3) The collapse of the Ottoman Empire that had ruled the Middle East for centuries.
In many ways these events are still reverberating through the world today as we watch Putin push for power in the Ukraine and now Syria in attempts to regain the glory of Soviet Union and Imperial Russia. The divying up of the Middle East following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the end of WWI was more about preserving European interest's in the region than respecting ethnic or religious de facto boundaries as we now watch this region collapse in chaos and failed states.
But perhaps most importantly, the conventional political and military wisdom of the day as Tuchman so aptly recounts was that the world could not survive a long drawn out war and victory would be a achieved through a decisive, offensive battle (We'll be home by Christmas") when we now know the tragic reality that WW1 was a 4 year bloody defensive war where millions lost their lives. I think we should keep this all in mind when the "talking heads" on television relate the "conventional wisdom" about what to do with the Ukraine, Syria, Iran etc.
It is inevitable to compare Tuchman's Guns of August to Margaret McMillain's also excellent account of WW1 - The War that ended Peace. Both Tuchman and McMillian are very good at capturing the personalities of the key political and military figures of the day that had decisive influence on the events that lead Europe on the path to war.
Personally, I found McMillian took a longer viewpoint and was better at analyzing and explaining the military strategies and the international political pressures in response to the central question of her book which was was there a point in time at which the seemingly inevitable march to war could be stopped? Tuchman dived down into the nitty gritty. In particular, she excelled at (surprisingly) gripping and suspenseful accounts of the early battles of August, capturing the chaos, the incompetency; the incredible courage and horrors of war - culminating in the Battle of the Marne, which as she puts did not end the war but allowed the war to continue on for another tragic 4 years.
Highly recommend - even if you are not into military history.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Canada on September 13, 2020
Verified Purchase
The nikon 7200 book is excellent but here’s my concern at indigo/chapters book stores I get 10% plus points so I would have saved
$5.50 + $4/5.00 or more in shipping so a total of $10.00 -$12.00 could have been saved ? Every body says buying at Amazon is cheaper ! I don’t know??? It never works for me , the other side always excels and succeeded I learnt it the hard way !!! Thanks
$5.50 + $4/5.00 or more in shipping so a total of $10.00 -$12.00 could have been saved ? Every body says buying at Amazon is cheaper ! I don’t know??? It never works for me , the other side always excels and succeeded I learnt it the hard way !!! Thanks
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Canada on January 13, 2015
Verified Purchase
Barbara Tuchman has taken all the details of August 1914 and produced an incredible book. Europe is unwittingly falling into the vortex of The Great War. Germany is attempting to conquer France. At the same time, Germany must also contend with the Russians on the Eastern Front. England enters the War on the side of France. The BEF is commanded by an incompetent, named Sir John French. All of these; social, military, and political events, combine into a spell binding story. The results would lead to a military stalemate/catastrophe. The ensuing World War would last until November 1918.
The first part of the book starts off, like any other historical narrative. However, when the German invasion starts to take affect, the book becomes almost impossible to put down. There is reason this book won a Pulitzer Prize; it is an exceptional read.
The first part of the book starts off, like any other historical narrative. However, when the German invasion starts to take affect, the book becomes almost impossible to put down. There is reason this book won a Pulitzer Prize; it is an exceptional read.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Canada on October 16, 2021
Verified Purchase
Well researched and written. Covers the cause and the first months of the war. Not an overview. As you read this book and you were not there to experience the horror, this will widen your understanding and may make you look at remembrance day in a slightly different way. God bless our troops.
Reviewed in Canada on August 17, 2014
Verified Purchase
Seems to be extremely thoroughly researched and documented re the events of the time-frame it covers. I could have done with the Dummies version of which army or squadron or whatever was moving where (the maps provided are too small on a Kindle to be useful), but her descriptions of the process, and impact, of getting into the war, and its beginning, were very instructive.
Wouldn't it be nice if the people who engaged in the Iraq war had read, and heeded, this book.
And that's its greatest value, in my opinion: the lessons she identifies are ones the world and its decision-makers still desperately need to read, contemplate, and observe.
Wouldn't it be nice if the people who engaged in the Iraq war had read, and heeded, this book.
And that's its greatest value, in my opinion: the lessons she identifies are ones the world and its decision-makers still desperately need to read, contemplate, and observe.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Canada on November 30, 2021
Verified Purchase
a tribute to the French army of ww1. It stopped the German army cold. Sadly the British contribution was shameful. A real eye-opener for the British history buff.
Reviewed in Canada on November 20, 2013
Verified Purchase
Russia forced Germany to move 2 Corps from the Western to the Eastern front. The additional German trod arrived to late to assist in the Russian Defeat, but their loss on the Western Front was to prove catastrophe to Germany on the Marne. The defeatist attitude of Field Marshall French and British failure to quickly remove him was interesting to this reader. This is a worthwhile read on the origins and beginning of WW1 highly recommended.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
John S
1.0 out of 5 stars
Overhyped book that has been superseded.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 9, 2017Verified Purchase
In my opinion a massively overhyped book. It spends relatively little time on the most important question of why the European nations went to war. Most of the book is focussed on the military mistakes on the Western Front. With more perspective than Tuchman had, it is not clear these mistakes were in fact errors and those errors only happened because of the political mistakes that preceded them. The other two fronts in the war are given very short shrift but are equally important even if less well known.
Don't waste your time with this book, try one of the more modern works that actually try to address the question as to why the war started: "Sleepwalkers" and "The war that ended peace" are much better bets.
Don't waste your time with this book, try one of the more modern works that actually try to address the question as to why the war started: "Sleepwalkers" and "The war that ended peace" are much better bets.
34 people found this helpful
Report abuse
sgh100
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very interesting read, learned a lot
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 22, 2021Verified Purchase
As other reviews, both on Amazon and elsewhere, have said, this is an amazing book.
While it is very much "non-fiction" and, in many ways, "a history book", it is very well written, and very readable. Some of the sentences / paragraphs are incredibly well crafted, and you'll probably learn some new words along the way e.g. tatterdemalion. I loved that one.
The level / depth of research behind this book is phenomenal, and to think this 500 pages + represents only the first month of a 4 yrs + war.
For me, it has done a few things.
First, I feel much more informed about the reasons for the onset of WW1. I had previously heard that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the most important cause for the start of WW1, but I now know that was really only a part of the story. This book outlines the extent to which Germany had been "planning" war, and talking about extending its reach/influence through war, for many years before 1914. I personally had no idea that this was such an important factor or so openly discussed in Germany prior to the war. It also makes an important connection back to a war in 1870, which isn't covered in detail but is clearly a major factor.
Second, I now feel better informed about the role Britain played at the start of the war or, to be more precise, the role it didn't play in that first month. As a nation we're brought-up to think we played a huge role in both world wars and, while this isn't disputed as a whole, it seems we didn't entirely cover ourselves in glory in that first month (notwithstanding the fact that we did send thousands of troops, when no other core European nation did, with the exception of Russia).
Third, I wasn't really clear how Belgium came into being, and I'm now much clearer on that. I also have a renewed respect for Belgium and the way they stood-up to the initial invasion, in the face of certain defeat, in 1914. Inspiring stuff.
Finally, it has reinforced the importance of communication, relationships and trust in any large-scale human endeavour. That these were, in large parts at least, missing on the Allied side in the first month of the war seems clear, though the communication piece can be partly ascribed to the lack of modern technology. It also brings home the fact that, sometimes, "you get what you prepare for" and that, if you prepare enough for bad things to happen, you can sometimes make them happen. That's how it felt to me anyhow.
My only criticism is that, at times, I found it extremely difficult to keep in my head the various individuals, battle fronts, town names and situations. At certain points the author gets into such depths on these points that I got lost, and couldn't keep that multi-dimensional view in my head. Probably others will do better.
But, overall, I'd highly recommend this book. It's obviously very old (1960s I think), but, as a clear account of that first terrible month, it is excellent to read and very informative indeed. It has left wanting to learn more about WW1, though I'm not sure the next 4 yrs make for particularly happy reading (especially not in the middle of a pandemic...)
While it is very much "non-fiction" and, in many ways, "a history book", it is very well written, and very readable. Some of the sentences / paragraphs are incredibly well crafted, and you'll probably learn some new words along the way e.g. tatterdemalion. I loved that one.
The level / depth of research behind this book is phenomenal, and to think this 500 pages + represents only the first month of a 4 yrs + war.
For me, it has done a few things.
First, I feel much more informed about the reasons for the onset of WW1. I had previously heard that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the most important cause for the start of WW1, but I now know that was really only a part of the story. This book outlines the extent to which Germany had been "planning" war, and talking about extending its reach/influence through war, for many years before 1914. I personally had no idea that this was such an important factor or so openly discussed in Germany prior to the war. It also makes an important connection back to a war in 1870, which isn't covered in detail but is clearly a major factor.
Second, I now feel better informed about the role Britain played at the start of the war or, to be more precise, the role it didn't play in that first month. As a nation we're brought-up to think we played a huge role in both world wars and, while this isn't disputed as a whole, it seems we didn't entirely cover ourselves in glory in that first month (notwithstanding the fact that we did send thousands of troops, when no other core European nation did, with the exception of Russia).
Third, I wasn't really clear how Belgium came into being, and I'm now much clearer on that. I also have a renewed respect for Belgium and the way they stood-up to the initial invasion, in the face of certain defeat, in 1914. Inspiring stuff.
Finally, it has reinforced the importance of communication, relationships and trust in any large-scale human endeavour. That these were, in large parts at least, missing on the Allied side in the first month of the war seems clear, though the communication piece can be partly ascribed to the lack of modern technology. It also brings home the fact that, sometimes, "you get what you prepare for" and that, if you prepare enough for bad things to happen, you can sometimes make them happen. That's how it felt to me anyhow.
My only criticism is that, at times, I found it extremely difficult to keep in my head the various individuals, battle fronts, town names and situations. At certain points the author gets into such depths on these points that I got lost, and couldn't keep that multi-dimensional view in my head. Probably others will do better.
But, overall, I'd highly recommend this book. It's obviously very old (1960s I think), but, as a clear account of that first terrible month, it is excellent to read and very informative indeed. It has left wanting to learn more about WW1, though I'm not sure the next 4 yrs make for particularly happy reading (especially not in the middle of a pandemic...)
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Gazza
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Guns of August
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 2, 2021Verified Purchase
I read somewhere that The Guns of August has since been surpassed in its research and treatment of events leading to the outbreak of the First World War. This may be the case as I’m no historian. However, it is certainly a fabulous read, brilliantly written (almost like a novel) and I can guarantee that if you only had a smidgen of interest in history before reading this book, then afterwards you’ll be hooked on the subject for good and seeking out a plethora of similar books to read. Highly recommended.
I hope you find my review helpful.
I hope you find my review helpful.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
David Bisset
5.0 out of 5 stars
Classic of military history
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 28, 2021Verified Purchase
I have read this book three times, and that, for me, is an unusual phenomenon! Barbara Tuchman wrote a book which transcends normal military history. It is a veritable grand narrative which never neglects the human factor.Such works are rare; hence it's drama, insights and longevity.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
JohnBishop55
5.0 out of 5 stars
A masterly work whose relevance is again topical
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 19, 2013Verified Purchase
With the centenary of the start of WW1 less than a year away, Barbara Tuchman's account of the lead-in to and first month of the War, published originally in 1962, provides a wide-ranging and insightful study of the events and personalities that led to the catastrophe that would determine the course of the Twentieth Century. Given the UK Government's £50m investment in 'commemoration', much of the book is a sobering reminder of many of the realities: the comparatively minor, and reluctant, part played by the BEF, sent by a vacillating British Government only when its treaty obligations to Belgium could not be dodged and then lumbered with conflicting aims that led to its virtual betrayal of the French army; the scale of German atrocities in Belgium, obscured by the larger-scale horrors to come, that might pose a few problems for a 'neutral' approach to blame in the commemorations; the general failure of political leaders to act with integrity and decisiveness - only King Albert of Belgium emerges with any credit. As, most of the time, does the ordinary soldier, as usual paying the price.
If history is to teach us anything, there are lessons aplenty in this masterly work. Not least that countries are always preparing to fight the last war. There are uneasy echoes in this book of attitudes to the current US brinkmanship over their budget and 'small problems' in the Balkans: economic rather than military issues though ones that evoke similar human weaknesses and might have consequences as unimagined as those of that summer a hundred years ago.
If history is to teach us anything, there are lessons aplenty in this masterly work. Not least that countries are always preparing to fight the last war. There are uneasy echoes in this book of attitudes to the current US brinkmanship over their budget and 'small problems' in the Balkans: economic rather than military issues though ones that evoke similar human weaknesses and might have consequences as unimagined as those of that summer a hundred years ago.
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse





