Buy Used
CDN$ 14.38
+ CDN$ 6.49 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Shipped from the US -- Expect delivery in 1-2 weeks. Shows some signs of wear, and may have some markings on the inside. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Shipped to over one million happy customers. Your purchase benefits world literacy!
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century Hardcover – Aug 11 2000

4.2 out of 5 stars 18 customer reviews

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
"Please retry"
CDN$ 46.08 CDN$ 14.38

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child
click to open popover

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 480 pages
  • Publisher: Yale University Press (Aug. 11 2000)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0300087004
  • ISBN-13: 978-0300087000
  • Product Dimensions: 24 x 16.3 x 3.6 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 717 g
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars 18 customer reviews
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #657,070 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

From Amazon

In Humanity, English ethicist Jonathan Glover begins with the now commonplace observation that the last 100 years were perhaps the most brutal in all history. But the problem wasn't that human nature suddenly took a sharp turn for the worse: "It is a myth that barbarism is unique to the twentieth century: the whole of human history includes wars, massacres, and every kind of torture and cruelty," he writes. Technology has made a huge difference, but psychology has remained the same--and this is what Glover seeks to examine, through discussions of Nietzsche, the My Lai atrocity in Vietnam, Hiroshima, tribal genocide in Rwanda, Stalinism, Nazism, and so on.

There is much history here, but Humanity is fundamentally a book of philosophy. In his first chapter, for instance, Glover announces his goal "to replace the thin, mechanical psychology of the Enlightenment with something more complex, something closer to reality." But he also seeks "to defend the Enlightenment hope of a world that is more peaceful and more humane, the hope that by understanding more about ourselves we can do something to create a world with less misery." The result is an odd combination of darkness and light--darkness because the subject matter of the 20th century's moral failings is so bleak, light because of Glover's earnest optimism, which insists that "keeping the past alive may help to prevent atrocities." He cites Stalin's bracing comment, made while signing death warrants: "Who's going to remember all this riff-raff in ten or twenty years' time? No one." At one level, Humanity is a book of remembrance. But it's more than that: it's also an attempt to understand what it is in the human mind that makes moral disaster always loom--and a prayer that this aspect of our psychology might be better controlled. --John J. Miller

From Booklist

An ethics academic in Britain, Glover discourses on the dismantlement of absolute morality concepts synonymous with Friedrich Nietzsche, and explicitly put into effect by the twentieth century's terrible tyrants. To describe the release Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, and Pol Pot granted themselves from ordinary morality's prohibitions against killing, Glover quotes their ideological justifications of creating a perfect human society. Having opened this book with Nietzsche's pronouncements that man creates his morals, Glover's linking of mass murder with that philosopher is direct, and, if not an original way of comprehending the sufferings inflicted by dictators, it is worthwhile revisiting for those vexed by the apparent meaninglessness of enormous crimes. Indeed, Glover is a direct writer, not given to the opacity that clouds many a discussion of ethics. For instance, he narrates specific atrocities, and describes the psychological "traps" the triggermen find themselves in as their rationales for their actions. The "trap" metaphor extends in Glover's view to events such as World War I, and whatever dispute diplomatic historians will make with that, ethicists will find profit in Glover's not totally bleak survey. Gilbert Taylor
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

See all Product Description

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
Jonathan Glover focuses on the role of the individual's beliefs and actions in creating history. He rejects the idea of an objective moral law, claiming that such belief yields a "naive," "disastrous" division between morality and practical consequences. But he also fears a slide into amoralism. He advocates "humanized ethics" as an optimistic alternative that more accurately reflects our psychological complexity. He does not fully describe what the specific rules might be or how we might achieve consensus on them. But he clearly identifies the "moral resources" of sympathy and respect upon which he says we should base our "moral identities" and our moral theories.
Alienation from the moral resources contributes to the capacity for cruelty. Glover distinguishes between emotional insensibility conceived as a means to an end, that is, an aid to killing more efficiently (as in Stalinism and Maoism), and emotional insensibility conceived as an end in itself (as in Nazism, which conceived hardness as a hallmark of a new Nietzschean super-human.)
The book is a treasure trove of anecdotes and statistics about genocide. Among the most memorable anecdotes is George Orwell's story of holding his fire on an enemy who was holding up his trousers while running for safety, because the undressed enemy suddenly appeared to Orwell as a vulnerable human being who was capable of feeling indignity and fear. I learned a lot of important history and will probably use the book for reference.
My only complaints are that the philosophical discussion of pacifism, and its variants and alternatives, was not as advanced and complex as I'd hoped, and that in some places the book read more like a sensational encyclopedia of torture techniques rather than a political analysis.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Humanity, though not perfect, is an exceptional book. To be sure, Glover's writing, particularly in the early going, does come across as superficial, almost journalistic. But further into reading "Humanity," Glover's exposition becomes much more thought provoking and persuasive. It is important to note that "Humanity" is not a work of philosophical analysis. Although Glover does tackle some philosophical themes - such as the role philosophy played in the causation of the Nazi experiment, among others - "Humanity" is mostly concerned with historical presentation. And with this goal in mind, Glover does a decent job encapsulating and synthesizing the major events and schools of thought that have profoundly influenced or changed our moral outlook during 20th century.
I think "Humanity" is a book everyone should read. Some of the issues and events discussed in "Humanity" may seem obvious to some. However, if necessary, it is important to revisit these topics again. Glover describes in particularly devastating, and at times graphic, fashion the horrendous consequences of unfettered nationalism, tribalism and religious extremism. Moreover, Glover goes into detail about how people who perpetrated some of the worse atrocities of the recent century often utilized "cold jokes" and a "hardened persona" to fend off any feelings of empathy toward the people they were victimizing. Inspite of the Glover's shortcomings, which are relatively minor, I think these are lessons all of humanity should learn from and I fully recommend "Humanity."
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This excellent book by Jonathan Glover addresses the twentieth century historical impact of what has been called "the decline of the moral ontology of Western man", most dramatically announced and urged along by Friedrich Nietzsche late in the 18 hundreds. This is only partly a matter of "the long, slow death of God in Western culture" and extends also - and not inconsequently - to an ever-more-apparent dwindling of belief in what our author himself calls "the moral law." Mr. Glover's specific topic is this particular part of the more general cultural transformation, which comprises both a withering away of belief in moral realism in favor of skepticism and a by no means unrelated lessening of commitment to the actual observance of moral requirements.
Indeed, the decline - of belief, I mean - appears to be complete in the mind of Mr. Glover, himself, who seems to fully share the theoretical outlook whose practical impact and philosophical meaning he aims to analyze, being personally both an atheist and a moral skeptic. But he clearly thinks these kinds of unbelief are actually all right, for him and for our age; and that morality may turn out to be "more defensible," anyway, when "seen to be a human creation" that we "can shape ...consciously to serve people's needs and interests, and to reflect the things we most care about."
And that is indeed what he does in this lucidly written, well documented and fascinating book: set to work at "creating" and "consciously shaping" morality in light of the great moral traumas of the last century, and partly with a hope of staving off more of them.
A word of criticism, not so much of the book as of the view:
As the reader will know, Mr.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse

Most recent customer reviews

Look for similar items by category