CDN$ 24.92
  • List Price: CDN$ 27.00
  • You Save: CDN$ 2.08 (8%)
FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25.
Only 6 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.
Introduction to Proof in ... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 3 images

Introduction to Proof in Abstract Mathematics Paperback – Jan 20 2011

See all 6 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
CDN$ 24.92
CDN$ 18.42 CDN$ 40.69

FREE Unlimited Cloud Photo Storage When You Try Amazon Student
click to open popover

Special Offers and Product Promotions

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Dover Publications; Unabridged edition (Feb. 17 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0486478548
  • ISBN-13: 978-0486478548
  • Product Dimensions: 16.5 x 2.3 x 23.1 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 544 g
  • Average Customer Review: Be the first to review this item
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #176,142 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 2.0 out of 5 stars 1 review
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Do Not Buy This Oct. 26 2013
By Wal-Mart'Queisha Jenkins - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The concept seems very good for those who are new to proofs (and logic), but the way it is carried out is a bit chaotic. Specifically, although the author starts the reader off with one basic proof "rule" per section, the names given to the rules and the symbols by which they are denoted in proofs are difficult to remember, especially as they begin to accumulate in subsequent sections. These rules are VERY basic, and would probably bore anyone besides slower math students. Having recently finished a book on basic logic, I found that I pretty much already knew them all. Also, though I'd had little practice writing proofs myself, having read textbook proofs here and there over the years was enough to put my ability level beyond this slow-paced book.

Throughout the book, the author introduces the reader to various subjects in abstract mathematics and provides some appropriately basic theorems that are subsequently used in the proofs. This is good if the reader desires a survey of math in one book.

I would hesitate to recommend this book to anyone, regardless of mathematical background. If looking at a math proof leaves you absolutely baffled and almost completely unable to follow the reasoning, and you want to jump into math proofs immediately at the shallow end and are willing to plod along with the author's symbolic system, then you may want to try this book. You would probably have a firmer grounding in the reasoning process if you start off learning basic propositional and predicate calculus (aka symbolic logic 101), then move on to a basic text on a relatively simple system of abstract math, such as number theory or set theory. When you come to a theorem, try to write the proof yourself, then compare your work to what the author did. Symbolic logic will give you meaningful terms for the rules of inference used in proofs and present them in a universal (not just mathematical) context, making them easier to remember. Logic 101 is also probably a good introduction for those who have stronger linguistic skills than math skills.

If you are a bit more comfortable/ambitious after logic 101, and the sort of student who learns better knowing "why" before the "what," (meaning you learn better from following pre-set rules than seeing examples) you may even want to try to find a simple text on mathematical logic.

I'm using both of these methods simultaneously, and it seems to work well.