Buy Used
CDN$ 0.77
+ CDN$ 6.49 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See more of our deals.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Light such a Candle: Chapters in the History of Science and Technology Hardcover – Nov 1 1997


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 45.92 CDN$ 0.77

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child
click to open popover

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.




Product Details

  • Hardcover: 396 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press (Nov. 1 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0198500564
  • ISBN-13: 978-0198500568
  • Product Dimensions: 16 x 3 x 23.1 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 821 g
  • Average Customer Review: Be the first to review this item
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Review

`The format of the book is attractive, and its argument provides a fairly accessible ... introductory exposition of topics in the history of science. But given the fairly technical level of the text, it is likely to appeal to scientists rather than to the nonscientists whose confusion about the relationship between science and technology the author has sought to clarify.' Nature

From the Publisher

halftones, line figures

See all Product Description

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: HASH(0xa62eaa68) out of 5 stars 1 review
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa691b138) out of 5 stars The difference between science and technology Oct. 1 2012
By John Duncan - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
Written a few years after Keith Laidler's excellent The World of Physical Chemistry this book covers some of the same ground, with a significant amount of overlap in content, especially in the early chapters on thermodynamics. However, the emphasis and scope are different. Here he discusses not just physical chemistry but science as a whole, including plenty of physics and a small amount of biology. In addition, the target audience is different: Laidler is concerned that journalists, politicians and the general public nearly always confuse science with technology, so that most of what is reported as "science" is actually technology. As he explains, what scientists regard as major scientific advances, ranging from relativity and quantum mechanisms to the theory of natural selection, are advances in understanding, whereas popular ideas of scientific advances, such as computers, television and jet airliners, are applications of existing understanding. He points out, for example, that although Aristotle would never have seen a zip fastener he would have had no difficulty for understanding how it worked.

Why is this important? It is important because people who define science policy and science spending for governments ought to know what science is. However, there is abundant evidence that many elected officials have no idea what science is, most flagrantly in the case of biology but also for science as a whole. It would be nice to think that the book was reaching its target audience, but I fear that most of its likely readers will have been people who already accepted its principal message.

After the introductory chapter, Laidler discusses several examples of technological advances over the past two centuries, from steam engines to atomic power, with other chapters on photography, electric power, radio transmission, electronics, and x-ray crystallography. At the beginning the technology came first and the science was built on it: the early development of steam engines owed nothing to understanding, but it led to the science of thermodynamics. With modern technology this is reversed: it would have impossible for usable GPS navigation systems to have been developed without prior understanding of the theory of relativity. Laidler argued that that trend can only continue, and that major future advances in technology can only follow in the wake of advances in scientific understanding.

When the book was published in 1998, Laidler thought that Richard Dawkins was too hard on religious belief -- "the plain fact is that there are many intelligent people who hold religious beliefs and accept evolutionary theory". I think he was probably wrong about his "plain fact", but in any case the progressive endarkenment that has characterized the first years of the 21st century might have hardened his attitude to religious belief.


Feedback