- Paperback: 165 pages
- Publisher: Neopoiesis Press, LLC (Jan. 26 2011)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0983274703
- ISBN-13: 978-0983274704
- Product Dimensions: 14 x 1 x 21.6 cm
- Shipping Weight: 240 g
- Average Customer Review: Be the first to review this item
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #453,313 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Have one to sell?
Media and Formal Cause Paperback – Jan 26 2011
This shopping feature will continue to load items. In order to navigate out of this carousel, please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
There are no customer reviews yet.
|5 star (0%)|
|4 star (0%)|
|3 star (0%)|
|2 star (0%)|
|1 star (0%)|
Most helpful customer reviews on Amazon.com
Amazon.com: 3 reviews
One person found this helpful.
on February 2, 2016 - Published on Amazon.com
A critical book for human beings. Read McLuhan's "The Classical Trivium" first.
15 people found this helpful.
McLuhan rides the academic range again. . .
on February 18, 2011 - Published on Amazon.com
The small size of this book belies its importance. The three introductory essays serve as background and overture for the scholarly essay on formal cause by Eric McLuhan. This book is about the background for McLuhan's development. And what a background! What shoulders the McLuhans stand on! Aristotle, Aquinas, Eliot, Maritain, Popper, Bunge to name only a few, all great ghosts to stand with, to be sure. Explicating Aristole's discussion of four causes, McLuhan teases out what Aristotle meant by his four causes, especially the most misunderstood, formal cause. He describes how formal cause relates to both the multi-dimensional pre-literate Greek LOGOS and the modern, narrow LOGOS of rational dialectic and science, the Classical and academic roots of McLuhan's much misunderstood contrast between percept and concept. This is not a book, however, for the Gosh-Gee-Whiz McLuhan fan; this is a book for the scholars and critics who are curious about the McLuhans, or may have dismissed them as insignificant and out-of-date thinkers. I hope the scholars and critics will be engaged to read it, and support or refute it; Media and Formal Cause is too important to be ignored.
5 people found this helpful.
The foundation of social and living science
on April 20, 2012 - Published on Amazon.com
This maybe Eric & Marshall's most profound book, in this age of science, the Mcluhan's make clear that the foundations of most science has been based on two forms of causation - efficient and material, what has been called the `physics worldview [...]. The domain of social sciences has tended to focus on `final cause' - the development of human purposes. But this book substantiates and precedes what Stuart Kauffman has recently elaborated in his ground breaking paper "No Entailing Law, But Enablement in the Evolution of the Biosphere" [...]. McLuhan makes Formal cause simple (as it can be made without becoming simplistic) - the effects precede the cause - the co-evolving nature of figure made possible by a ground - only `seeable' after visibility of the figure. For anyone interested in foresight, this book is a fundamental pre-requisite. We have been lulled into thinking that there is only a type of linear causality underlying the reality of our world. What McLuhan elaborate (and Kauffman hints at - especially in his NPR blog) is that the nature of an evolving `whole' can precede the emergence of a visible figure, that the whole can only become clear once we have defined and seen a figure - even if the figure precedes the visibility of its causal ground. Most highly recommended.