Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why Paperback – Feb. 6 2007
|
Bart D. Ehrman
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author and more.
search results for this author
|
|
Amazon Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
|
— | — |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
Free with your Audible trial | ||
|
Hardcover
"Please retry"
|
CDN$ 32.84 | CDN$ 10.12 |
|
Paperback
"Please retry"
|
CDN$ 23.99
|
CDN$ 17.43 | CDN$ 12.78 |
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)Paperback
How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from GalileePaperback
Heaven and Hell: A History of the AfterlifeHardcover
Forged: Writing in the Name of God--Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They ArePaperback
Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New TestamentPaperback
Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never KnewPaperback
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : HarperOne; 1st edition (Feb. 6 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0060859512
- ISBN-13 : 978-0060859510
- Item Weight : 214 g
- Dimensions : 15.24 x 1.63 x 22.86 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: #27,307 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Product description
Review
About the Author
Bart D. Ehrman is one of the most renowned and controversial Bible scholars in the world today. He is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and is the author of more than twenty books, including the New York Times bestsellers How Jesus Became God; Misquoting Jesus; God’s Problem; Jesus, Interrupted; and Forged. He has appeared on Dateline NBC, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, CNN, History, and top NPR programs, as well as been featured in TIME, the New York Times, The Washington Post, The New Yorker, and other publications. He lives in Durham, North Carolina. Visit the author online at www.bartdehrman.com.
More items to explore
Customer reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
.
Even so, this book is a marvelous introduction to the art/science of textual criticism; the goal of which is to bring us to a better understanding of what the earliest texts actually said (ie. before all the various changes crept in). There are plently of examples to illustrate how and why the texts were changed over time, and these are all both fascinating and informative. This book is also an excellent antidote for those inclined toward bibliolatry (ie. via doctrines of inerrancy and verbal inspiration). But my favorite part of the book is the opening paragraph of the last chapter where professor Ehrman speaks about what it means to be a text-man:
.
"In many ways, being a textual critic is like doing detective work. There is a puzzle to be solved and evidence to be uncovered. The evidence is often ambiguous, capable of being interpreted in various ways, and a case has to be made for one solution of the problem over another" (p.207). Herein lies the glory - and the frustration - of textual criticism; for the "iron-clad proof" that most people (irrationally) demand is beyond the reach of the text-men (ie. owing to the sad fact that the original autographs of the NT-documents are simply not available to us). ~ textman ;>
Top reviews from other countries
I have learned a great deal about the problems of textual criticism, and it was fun to read how early scribes may have altered the text in such a way that our modern reading has been affected by it. And how modern scholarship is attempting to recover the originals.
But it's the "more or less" that I have problems with. It is clear that Erhman has a slant, an agenda. I do not mean this in a derogatory fashion. We all have our slants and our agendas. And this has coloured his opinions. There were parts of the text where I really felt he was stretching it. It's hard to remember all of the areas i felt he was doing this, but just this morning I finished up the last chapter where he delves into the anti-Semitic reasons as to why early scribes may have changed the text. He speaks with such certainty, but like so much in this field his opinions are only conjecture. Perhaps very good and logical, but sitting there reading I was able to come up with other possible scenarios (using the principles he gives) as to why the text may have changed.
Ehrman tries to portray himself as a disinterested scholar, but it is clear he dislikes Christianity even though he has given his life to the study of it. That's fine. But one should be aware that this will affect the way one looks at the evidence and how one interprets it.
I believe Christianity is primarily about a relationship with Jesus Christ, which is why I am not too bothered by the idea that textual variants have appeared in the manuscripts. Fundamentalistic religion balks at the idea and squirms around it, but the Word is a Person, not ink on a page.
Given that so many changes were made during the initial centuries following the writing of the original New Testament manuscripts, we can't know what those originals actually said. All we know is what later writers offer us ... and, as these later documents are so very different from each other, we've no idea which - if any - is more authentic. What's more, still later versions of the New Testament - such as the King James - are is various ways different from the earliest existing manuscripts. So further changes - throughout the second half of the first millennium, and during the first half of the second millennium - have been made. Sentences in the text have been altered; new sentences have been added!
What Ehrman does is provide us with a fascinating account on who changed the New Testament. This is a book written with a popular audience in mind, and it's straightforward to understand. I found it an enjoyable read ... But it is rather short (at some 218 pages), and it goes into little detail as regards what the alterations and changes actually are. Ehrman points out that such adaptations have been made, but says too little about their specifics. I would have enjoyed a more in-depth study. Fortunately, the author has written such a book - The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament .
I've never truly understood how it came to be, and why it seems to be a confused collection of separate works, as opposed to a clear dictation from the all mighty. This book not only explains the origins, but it also does so with clarity and ease, and that's greatly appreciated.
Let me say this was an excellent book. The author it seems is a brilliant teacher. Clear explanations and written in a style that is vivid and engaging especially for what could be a slightly dour and dusty subject if you're not specifically into the history of the biblical text. Which I'm not really in any meaning full way.
My mind is dancing with curiosity even more so after reading. Yes, this book clearly demonstrates the Bible isn't divinely inspired as such, with so many glaring sometimes embarrassing examples of openly human intervention. But it's more than just those examples or errors alone for me.
I now want to know more, the original traditions that the first authors used to craft this most important of books, where did they come from? More questions, I want to dive deeper, which is a good thing as the author has written several books on this, and i now crave more!
Bart D Ehrman has found a new fan in me, this being the first book of his I've read. I will already be deep into the next one following on from this, probably finished it, by the time you read this.
Misquoting Jesus is essential reading for Christians and anyone outside of that with evem a slight interest in religion. It's great.
I think it's fair to say it complements his other works but if you were starting out on the works of Bart Ehrman, I'd try some of his other writings first - particularly the recent "How Jesus Became God". Ehrman is much heavier going than Reza Aslan ("Zealot"), but ultimately more rewarding. He may lack Aslan's fast paced story telling ability, but the analysis is more rewarding and deeper. That's not to diminish Aslan who has clearly gone for a more populist approach.
What Ehrman forces Christians to face up to is a combination of amateur, blundering scribes in the first centuries, deliberate alterations and "improvements" to the texts and a total absence of copyright law in the ancient world. Thousands of changes have wormed their way into the New Testament including accounts of Jesus's life and works that were inserted into the gospels from other sources. Theological agendas have removed offending words from the original texts and mistranslations have been repeated and accepted.
A fascinating book.
