A Monstrous Regiment of Women Mass Market Paperback – Dec 1 1996
|New from||Used from|
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
In The Beekeeper's Apprentice, Laurie R. King came up with a completely original story that had Sherlock Holmes as one of its principal characters but was in no way part of the Holmes canon. The focus of that book was a young woman, Mary Russell. Now in A Monstrous Regiment of Women, Mary Russell's adventures as a student of the famous detective continue. A series of murders claims members of a strange suffrage organization's wealthy young female volunteers, and Mary, with Holmes in the background, investigates, little knowing what danger she personally faces.
Laurie R. King is also the author of the Edgar Award-winning novel A Grave Talent. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Publishers Weekly
King's second mystery tale of a young woman who's a protege of Sherlock Holmes.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
I think "A Monstrous Regiment of Women" is the book I most enjoyed because it shows Russell pursuing a case that is entirely her own -- mysterious deaths among the followers of a charismatic feminist preacher -- and coming into her own as a woman in every sense of the word. Sherlock Holmes is very much present, but this is Russell's story and Russell is one of the most interesting characters I've encountered in mysteries.
I also enjoy the book because of the developing romantic relationship between Holmes and Russell. I've read the howls of protest from fans of Sherlock Holmes over this series, but I find King's books more enjoyable than Arthur Conan Doyle's. I took a course in college on Holmes and always viewed the stories as a rather quaint, stodgy, stilted picture of the Victorian era. By giving him Russell as a partner, King gave him a much needed shot in the arm and human vulnerabilities. Why wouldn't this Holmes fall in love with his best friend and partner? They're clearly soul mates. King makes the 39-year age difference insignificant.
Not to deter you, of course. It's a great story with a magnificent plot, the lovely story and plot line still there. It's simply the romantic undertones that are rather odd for my own feelings...
It is also extremely feministic. My father was...shall we say, adverse to the story...when he read it. He is not in favour of feminism, which drives all the women of the family insane. If you're anti-feministic, this movie will do the same to you as it has done to my father. The story, however, would make for an interesting movie. Many of these books would make for an interesting movie, actually, but this one would be very good for the modern day woman. That and "O Jerusalem," but the setting would be a little controversial for the times...
But back to the story: it is a wonderfully crafted story, but it simply isn't the same as the first book. You cannot help but be amazed at the ending, when you really learn about Mary like you never could have before. Enjoy the reading, and have fun!
"A Monstrous Regiment Of Women" is still an engaging read. Holmes and Russell are as acerbic towards each other as they were in "The Beekeeper's Apprentice" and the plot takes its customary twists and turns. Where King falls down somewhat is in her attempts at infusing this second offering of the Mary Russell series with more overt feminism - in this case, via the charismatic preaching of the mysterious Margery Childe. The plot revolves around the mysterious deaths of women associated with Childe's organisation, and naturally the simplest way to solve it seems to be to infiltrate Russell into the organisation.
As a plot itself, "Monstrous Regiment" is entertaining. Childe's refusal to explain some of the more miraculous events connected to her works from both a mystery standpoint and the standpoint of Russell's theological studies, and the two women engage in some interesting Biblical analysis. It is King's constant bludgeoning of the reader with the feminist doctrines which Childe and Russell have adopted which halts the progress of the plot. From a sociological perspective, such work may be of interest, however it has no need to become the focal point of so much of this novel.Read more ›
Holmes and Russell complemented each other wonderfully as partners in combating crime. But this ridiculous idea of a romance between them...how on *Earth* can anyone believe Holmes would marry his complete antithesis: an 1970's style ultrafeminist, smartmouthed, Jewish young woman forty years his junior who seems to live to irritate and contradict him?
We lose something of the real Holmes in this farcical scenario as he is dominated by Russell, becoming a thin shadow of his real self, merely a backdrop to display the supposed glow of Russell coming into her own. Doyle's Holmes answered to nobody. I shudder to see Holmes giving the equivalent of a meek "Yes dear" to Mary. Next thing you know he'll be happily changing the diapers on the inevitable Sherlock Jr while Mary's tromping around the country fighting crime.
It's somewhere between comedy and disgust that I read the Holmes/Russell exchanges in this book. With Holmes sneering about the "pleasures of the marriage bed" and forcibly kissing Russell (and her enjoying it!), it seems the great detective's turning into something of a Snidley Whiplash caricature. All he needs is a mustache to twirl as he manhandles the hapless maiden. Not that I'd expect Holmes to be bleeding-heart sensitive in any way, shape, or form, but this goes far beyond anything I can ever see.
I loved "The Beekeeper's Apprentice". The two worked wonderfully together, and I was pleased to leave them as friends and partners.
But the plot of "MRoW" was flat and uninteresting, and I cringed at Holmes having to rescue Russell in a rather hackneyed plot device.Read more ›
Most recent customer reviews
This is not the best of Mary Russell...the story doesn't have the action that one finds in Locked rooms... Read morePublished 14 months ago by Sasa
It was great!! I love this author. Have read all her books. Does a great job Would recommend this author.Published on Sept. 4 2013 by Marlene
'A Monstrous Regiment of Women' is intense! Even the title gave me shivers. King did a great job depicting a cultist atmosphere, while challenging a more fundamental believe... Read morePublished on May 31 2009 by Amazon Customer
I agree with the reviewer who felt the romance between Holmes and Russell was just too unbelieveable. Read morePublished on May 14 2004 by M. Brooks
How else can I say it: if you liked Beekeeper, you will love this book. It has all the feel of an older Sherlockian tale, yet it is told from his equal with only his insight. Read morePublished on April 19 2004
This Mary Russell mystery has as a central character Margery, who saw in the plight of the "surplus women" in England after WWI a call from God for her and other women to... Read morePublished on Jan. 25 2004 by Deborah B. Vaughan
It is 1921, England is still adjusting to life after World War I, and in her second outing from the pen of talented writer Laurie King, Mary Russell has moved on to studies at... Read morePublished on Aug. 30 2003 by audrey pierce
WARNING: about half of the other reviews here spoil a major plot point in this book!
Safe reviews to read (as of this date):
(4 stars) Not Beekeeper, But Entertaining... Read more