CDN$ 36.33
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Murder and the Reasonable... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 3 images

Murder and the Reasonable Man: Passion and Fear in the Criminal Courtroom Paperback – Oct 1 2007

4.5 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 36.33
CDN$ 31.41 CDN$ 43.07

Harry Potter Book Boutique
click to open popover

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.




Product Details

  • Paperback: 371 pages
  • Publisher: New York Univ Pr (Oct. 1 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0814751164
  • ISBN-13: 978-0814751169
  • Product Dimensions: 15.2 x 2.4 x 22.9 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 431 g
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars 4 customer reviews
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Review

(

"Provocative and persuasive. In this well-written and meticulously documented book, Cynthia Lee demonstrates how the law has defined 'reasonableness' in criminal law to favor men against women, straight men against gay men, and whites against blacks. Lee's synthesis of many seemingly different examples, with thoughtful responses to the various objections that might be raised, is legal scholarship that can make a difference in our social practices. This is a serious and compelling book that should lead to reform."
)-(Frank H. Wu), (author of "Yellow: Race in America beyond Black and White")

()-(), ()

(

"Smart, insightful, and important, this book proves that the criminal justice system does not treat all persons equally--that the reasonable man is a man, and that men get away with murder, while women pay with their lives. Must reading for students of the law, gender studies, and all those who care about equal justice."
)-(Susan Estrich), (Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Southern California, and author of "Real Rape, Getting Away with Murder: How Politics is Destroying the Criminal Justice System")

(

"For Cynthia Lee, legal analysis is not a scholastic exercise in logical deduction or philosophical puzzle-solving, but a vivid form of social criticism. In relentlessly exposing the law's foundation in partisan social norms, she challenges the prevailing modes of legal scholarship as well as the prevailing understandings of voluntary manslaughter and self-defense doctrine. Murder and the Reasonable Man establishes Lee as one of the pre-eminent commentators on American criminal law."
)-(Dan Kahan), (Professor of Law, Yale Law School)

(

"Lee's book is a compelling and well-informed analysis of the issues raised when courts confront questions of reasonableness in high-profile, headline-grabbing cases."
)-("Choice"), ()

"Smart, insightful, and important, this book proves that the criminal justice system does not treat all persons equally--that the reasonable man is a man, and that men get away with murder, while women pay with their lives. Must reading for students of the law, gender studies, and all those who care about equal justice."
-Susan Estrich, Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Southern California, and author of "Real Rape, Getting Away with Murder: How Politics is Destroying the Criminal Justice System"

"Provocative and persuasive. In this well-written and meticulously documented book, Cynthia Lee demonstrates how the law has defined 'reasonableness' in criminal law to favor men against women, straight men against gay men, and whites against blacks. Lee's synthesis of many seemingly different examples, with thoughtful responses to the various objections that might be raised, is legal scholarship that can make a difference in our social practices. This is a serious and compelling book that should lead to reform."
-Frank H. Wu, author of "Yellow: Race in America beyond Black and White"

"Lee's book is a compelling and well-informed analysis of the issues raised when courts confront questions of reasonableness in high-profile, headline-grabbing cases."
-"Choice",

-,

"For Cynthia Lee, legal analysis is not a scholastic exercise in logical deduction or philosophical puzzle-solving, but a vivid form of social criticism. In relentlessly exposing the law's foundation in partisan social norms, she challenges the prevailing modes of legal scholarship as well as the prevailing understandings of voluntary manslaughter and self-defense doctrine. Murder and the Reasonable Man establishes Lee as one of the pre-eminent commentators on American criminal law."
-Dan Kahan, Professor of Law, Yale Law School

"Lee challenges readers to question the concept of 'reasonableness' and how it has been applied. . . Scholars, students, professionals and the educated public will appreciate the careful, well-documented argument and pertinent examples."
-"Library Journal",

"Lee challenges readers to question the concept of 'reasonableness' and how it has been applied. . . Scholars, students, professionals and the educated public will appreciate the careful, well-documented argument and pertinent examples."
-"Library Journal"

"Lee's book is a compelling and well-informed analysis of the issues raised when courts confront questions of reasonableness in high-profile, headline-grabbing cases."
-"Choice"

Lee challenges readers to question the concept of 'reasonableness' and how it has been applied. . . Scholars, students, professionals and the educated public will appreciate the careful, well-documented argument and pertinent examples.
-"Library Journal""

For Cynthia Lee, legal analysis is not a scholastic exercise in logical deduction or philosophical puzzle-solving, but a vivid form of social criticism. In relentlessly exposing the law's foundation in partisan social norms, she challenges the prevailing modes of legal scholarship as well as the prevailing understandings of voluntary manslaughter and self-defense doctrine. Murder and the Reasonable Man establishes Lee as one of the pre-eminent commentators on American criminal law.
-Dan Kahan, Professor of Law, Yale Law School"

Provocative and persuasive. In this well-written and meticulously documented book, Cynthia Lee demonstrates how the law has defined reasonableness in criminal law to favor men against women, straight men against gay men, and whites against blacks. Lee s synthesis of many seemingly different examples, with thoughtful responses to the various objections that might be raised, is legal scholarship that can make a difference in our social practices. This is a serious and compelling book that should lead to reform.
-Frank H. Wu, author of "Yellow: Race in America beyond Black and White""

Smart, insightful, and important, this book proves that the criminal justice system does not treat all persons equally that the reasonable man is a man, and that men get away with murder, while women pay with their lives. Must reading for students of the law, gender studies, and all those who care about equal justice.
-Susan Estrich, Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Southern California, and author of "Real Rape, Getting Away with Murder: How Politics is Destroying the Criminal Justice System""

Lee's book is a compelling and well-informed analysis of the issues raised when courts confront questions of reasonableness in high-profile, headline-grabbing cases.
-"Choice""

About the Author

Cynthia Lee is Professor of Law at George Washington University School of Law, where she teaches Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, and Professional Responsibility.

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
3
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
Lee's thesis that the "reasonable man" standard is biased against women, GLBT persons, and members of racial and ethnic minorities is provocative and well supported with history and case law. Her suggestions for race-switching jury instructions raise questions about the reader's own biases and assumptions.
The problem comes in Lee's understanding of use-of-force issues especially issues relating to reaction times (which can result in shots to the side or back), stress hormones and memory (which can result in fragmented memory), stress hormones and fine muscle control (which makes it hard to practically shoot to wound), and the ability of handgun fire to penetrate standard building materials (which makes warning shots dangerous). Lee's book should be read in combination with practical self-defense and use-of-force articles by respected writers like Masaad Ayoob and Phil Messina.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This well-crafted book is the thinking person's guide to understanding the "reasonable man" defense. Cynthia Lee has written a meticulously researched book both important for its insight into the spirit of the law, as it is applies to the reasonable man defense, as for her storytelling in providing us a glimpse of the people behind the legal cases she presents.
The author builds an excellent case for revising the narrow social norms used by our legal system today when applying the reasonable man defense to less visible segments of our society: minorities, such as heterosexual women, gays and lesbians, and persons of color. She goes beyond pointing out what needs to be changed within our legal system by offering her own recommended solutions for leveling the playing field.
Highly recommended for non-legal types who have a passion for equal rights under the law.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
I highly recommend this book for law students interested in criminal law, either prosecution or defense side, and for students of the social sciences. Lee discusses how criminal defendants use provocation and self-defense arguments in the courtroom and how the defendants who rely on stereotypes regarding gender, race, and sexual orientation are often found to be reasonable in their violent acts. The book contains in-depth discussions of cases that illustrate Lee's thesis, making it easy to read for readers, including myself, who are not lawyers.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This is an extremely significant and thoughtful legal work challenging our notions of what should constitute "provocation" or "self-defense" in murder cases. Professor Lee illustrates how the defenses of "provocation" and "self-defense" have been successfully used to justify homocides motivated by racism, homophobia, and gender bias. Any criminal law judge or prosecutor who fails to read this book will be at a disadvantage in the courtroom. Every law student and every civil rights organization should read it.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: HASH(0xa2e81360) out of 5 stars 6 reviews
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa2d0b288) out of 5 stars Many good points don't always make a good argument. July 9 2007
By Mike - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I don't know if Lee understands the legal standards involving "reasonableness" and the use of force. She continual refers to "reasonable belief of death or great bodily injury" as if it is so amorphous that it cannot and in cases where racial stereotypes are involved is not reasonably applied. There are a number of factors that a jury is instructed to use when evaluating a use of deadly force incident that are 100% objective in determining the legality or illegality of it. Factors such as age differences between the two parties, prior knowledge of violent behavior on behalf of the assailant, physical size differences, if the defender was outnumbered, are both parties armed (and it doesn't have to be with a conventional weapon), are some of the considerations used to determine if there was a "reasonable belief of death or great bodily injury". Its not as fuzzy or gray as Lee is arguing as most states have these requirements on use of force either in the criminal law code or in some common law precedent; its almost as if this book is 40 years out of date.

If anything, this book makes a good case for the restriction of non-defined or "novel" affirmative defenses like "gay rage" and the Twinkie defense.

I was also bothered by Lee's interpretation of the Goetz case. She seems to believe that Goetz's defense, while not specifically bringing in the race question, was none the less guilt of racial stereotyping by describing the assailants as "vultures" and "animals". And although Lee castigates Goetz's defense for this (arguably accurate) depiction, she continually refers to the assailants as the "boys"; an equally loaded word itself designed to invoke sympathy in the reader. She fails to mention that these "boys" were all 18 and 19 years old. Two of the "boys" continued on their pattern of predation a short time later. James Ramseur was convicted of raping, beating and robbing a pregnant 19 year old woman in the Bronx, while the other "boy", Barry Allen, was convicted of two felony counts of armed robbery shortly after he was released from the hospital.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa2ebfba0) out of 5 stars Recommend for law students and students of social sciences Nov. 2 2003
By Student - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I highly recommend this book for law students interested in criminal law, either prosecution or defense side, and for students of the social sciences. Lee discusses how criminal defendants use provocation and self-defense arguments in the courtroom and how the defendants who rely on stereotypes regarding gender, race, and sexual orientation are often found to be reasonable in their violent acts. The book contains in-depth discussions of cases that illustrate Lee's thesis, making it easy to read for readers, including myself, who are not lawyers.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa361106c) out of 5 stars An Important and Insightful Book Aug. 11 2003
By Dee McCrorey, Author, Innovation in a Reinvented World - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This well-crafted book is the thinking person's guide to understanding the "reasonable man" defense. Cynthia Lee has written a meticulously researched book both important for its insight into the spirit of the law, as it is applies to the reasonable man defense, as for her storytelling in providing us a glimpse of the people behind the legal cases she presents.
The author builds an excellent case for revising the narrow social norms used by our legal system today when applying the reasonable man defense to less visible segments of our society: minorities, such as heterosexual women, gays and lesbians, and persons of color. She goes beyond pointing out what needs to be changed within our legal system by offering her own recommended solutions for leveling the playing field.
Highly recommended for non-legal types who have a passion for equal rights under the law.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa3269d80) out of 5 stars A must read for Judges, DA's & Criminal Defense Lawyers July 1 2003
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This is an extremely significant and thoughtful legal work challenging our notions of what should constitute "provocation" or "self-defense" in murder cases. Professor Lee illustrates how the defenses of "provocation" and "self-defense" have been successfully used to justify homocides motivated by racism, homophobia, and gender bias. Any criminal law judge or prosecutor who fails to read this book will be at a disadvantage in the courtroom. Every law student and every civil rights organization should read it.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa2b6799c) out of 5 stars Provocative Points, but Lacks Practical Understanding Oct. 29 2003
By Lisa J. Steele - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
Lee's thesis that the "reasonable man" standard is biased against women, GLBT persons, and members of racial and ethnic minorities is provocative and well supported with history and case law. Her suggestions for race-switching jury instructions raise questions about the reader's own biases and assumptions.
The problem comes in Lee's understanding of use-of-force issues especially issues relating to reaction times (which can result in shots to the side or back), stress hormones and memory (which can result in fragmented memory), stress hormones and fine muscle control (which makes it hard to practically shoot to wound), and the ability of handgun fire to penetrate standard building materials (which makes warning shots dangerous). Lee's book should be read in combination with practical self-defense and use-of-force articles by respected writers like Masaad Ayoob and Phil Messina.


Feedback