- Student Exclusive: Amazon Prime Student members save 10% on all textbook purchases. Enter code TEXT10 at checkout. Here's how (restrictions apply)
The Origin of the Logic of Symbolic Mathematics: Edmund Husserl and Jacob Klein Hardcover – Sep 7 2011
|New from||Used from|
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
"The Origin of the Logic of Symbolic Mathematics initiates a radical clarification of François Vieta’s 17th century mathematical introduction of the formal-symbolic, which marks the revolution that made and continues to make possible modern mathematics and logic. Through a philosophically subtle, clarifying, and exacting elaboration of Jacob Klein’s Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, Hopkins reveals flaws (and strengths) in Edmund Husserl’s thinking about numbers, the formal-symbolic, and the phenomenological foundation of the mathesis universalis." ―Robert Tragesser, Author of Phenomenology and Logic and Husserl and Realism in Logic and Mathematics
"Hopkins’ detailed and careful readings of the texts make his book a source of numerous insights, and its erudition is breathtaking." ―Husserl Studies
"This much needed book should go a long way both toward correcting the under-appreciation of Jacob Klein's brilliant work on the nature and historical origin of modern symbolic mathematics, and toward eliciting due attentio to the significance of that work for our interpretation of the modern scientific view of the world." ―Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
"This book serves not only as the first major contribution to scholarship on the thought of Jacob Klein, but also as a significant contribution to that of Husserl as well." ―The Review of Metaphysics
"A striking, original study... for the history of mathematics, our understanding of Husserlian phenomenology, and the concepts of formality and formalization." ―Robert B. Pippin, University of Chicago
"The Origin of the Logic of Symbolic Mathematics is a very important work. From an exegetical point of view it presents careful readings of an amazing amount of texts by Plato, Aristotle, Diophantus, Vieta, Stevin, Wallis, and Descartes and shows at the same time a profound knowledge of Husserl’s earlier and later texts...." ―History and Philosophy of Logic
"[The Origin of the Logic of Symbolic Mathematics] contains a very precise thesis and claim, which can only be tackled by applying the technical terms and methods from the tradition in which it originated." ―Philosophia Mathematica
"Hopkins brings all of the myriad concepts of Klein’s analysis of the origins of logic and symbolic mathematics into play as he elucidates the significance of the roles algebra, logic, and symbolic analysis generally have played in the development of modern mathematics" ―Mathematical Reviews
About the Author
Burt C. Hopkins is Professor of Philosophy at Seattle University. He is author of Intentionality in Husserl and Heidegger and The Philosophy of Husserl. He is founding editor (with Steven G. Crowell) of The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy and is permanent secretary of the Husserl Circle.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
It has been said that if two people agree on everything, one becomes unnecessary. In my own study of Klein, I don't always agree but I always learn. Hopkins believes, as I do, that Klein's book is one of the most important philosophic works of the 20th century. I find Hopkins discussion of Klein's work completely engaging and thought provoking. His review of Husserl's work and his comparison of Klein and Husserl's understanding of the emergence of modern symbolic mathematics is equally engaging. I am not yet in a position to appreciate fully the part of Husserl's work in the entire argument since I have not devoted the necessary study.
What makes all these studies so important is the notion of desedimentation, which Hopkins discusses at length. There are far too many histories of mathematics and philosophies of mathematics that simply reiterate misleading cliches about Greek mathematics and its relationship to modern mathematics. Klein traces the Greek concept of each number having an eidos and how this concept changes through Greek mathematical history and how the eidetic concept was reborn and remolded in the writings of Vieta, Stevins, Descartes, and Wallis. Hopkins goes through Klein's book chapter by chapter in a way that will only help the reader of Klein's great work.
In my own research, I explore the idea of eidos from the Pythagoareans through Plato and Euclid and the Neo-Platonists, From my point of view and as a result of the research and creative work I am doing, I feel that Klein has overlooked what the full doctrine of the number system might have been. The way they discussed eidos differed from Aristotle's and those who came after is, I beleive, because they did mathematics differently and understood the number field differently from the modern conception. It is only by imagining a coherent theory of how eidetic math worked that the entire Greek mathematical enterprise can be fiarly evaluated and the differences between the Greek approach and the modern approach can be more completely appreciated. What is not true is that modern mathematics simply supplanted ancient mathematics.
I hope this review is sufficient enough to draw attention to Hopkins' book and give impetus to a new study of Greek mathematics as possessing lost wisdom that expands the entire vision of what mathematics is about.
Hopkins is very careful, consistent, and technical in his terminology and, consequently, very dry reading. It is a labor to read the book, as are all literal commentaries, but the investment of time in this case pays its dividends. With Klein, you read a sentence and spend the next hour (or lifetime) thinking about what he just said. With this work, you spend fifteen minutes reading about what that very same sentence means. That's not a criticism. It's just the nature of commentary of this sort. No one will take an interest in this book whatsoever unless they already think highly of Klein. One already has to have a pretty good familiarity with his writings in order to slog through an academic analysis of this sort. I rated this four stars, rather than five, primarily because I feel that Klein's book is itself the preferable way to go if you are a disinterested seeker of truth. On the other hand, if have a scholarly and academic interest in Klein--or Husserl I suppose--this book by Hopkins will be required reading.
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Logic & Language
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Movements > Phenomenology
- Books > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Mathematics > Pure Mathematics
- Books > Science & Math > Mathematics > Pure Mathematics > Logic
- Books > Textbooks > Humanities > Philosophy > Logic
- Books > Textbooks > Sciences > Mathematics