- You'll save an extra 5% on Books purchased from Amazon.ca, now through July 29th. No code necessary, discount applied at checkout. Here's how (restrictions apply)
Peace, They Say: A History of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Most Famous and Controversial Prize in the World Hardcover – Mar 27 2012
|New from||Used from|
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
This delightful book entertained me and enriched my knowledge. How many books do that? If you pick it up, I defy you to put it down until you’ve finished it.”
Lou Cannon, historian and journalist
In an absorbingly well-researched, well-written and thoughtful history of the Peace Prize . . . Nordlinger looks with a critical but not jaundiced eye at the laureates. . . . In the course of his deliberations he has thought deeply about what genuinely constitutes peace.”
Andrew Roberts, historian
A masterly book, which dissects its notoriously controversial subject with precision, elegance, and wit. A splendid job!”
Solomon Volkov, Radio Liberty / Radio Free Europe
. . . like a history of the modern world, told through the prism of the prize, full of characters both familiar and unfamiliar, and well written in the style we’ve come to expect.”
John J. Miller, author, director of journalism at Hillsdale College
About the Author
Jay Nordlinger is a senior editor of National Review. He writes about a variety of subjects, including politics, foreign affairs, and the arts. He is music critic for The New Criterion and City Arts (New York), as well as for NR. He has won awards for his work on human rights, in particular. Some 100 pieces are gathered in Here, There & Everywhere: Collected Writings of Jay Nordlinger. A native Michigander, the author lives in New York.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Fortunately, this isn't the case. Nordlinger is thorough and fair. He provides his own conclusions, but only after summarizing both sides of any controversy. Sometimes he is surprising. For example, Nordlinger doesn't fault the Nobel committee for honoring Yassir Arafat. He understands its motivation to encourage negotiations in the Middle East. In fact Nordlinger notes that the prize is often awarded to works in progress that don't pan out. Occasionally this works out, such as the South African awards.
Another key point is that the Nobel committee often violates Alfred Nobel's will. It is supposed to go to the person who did the most for peace in the preceding year. Instead it is frequently a "lifetime achievement award." One change Nordlinger recommends is to focus less on celebrities. An additional criticism is that the award isn't always directly related to peace between nations. Sometimes the awards are for humantarian or human rights work. These efforts can be very worthwhile, but aren't directly related to peace. A frequent topic is the meaning of "peace." Mr. Nordlinger believes that Nobel believed in deterrence, not pacifism.
Nordlinger provides a brief biography of Alfred Nobel. For each laureate he describes the background of his or her work, the other contenders, debates about the award's merits, and a follow up on what happened later. This last item is sometimes embarrassing. One recipient had falsehoods in her autobiography. Another was undermined by the climategate scandal. Nordlinger also addresses Buckley's concerns about the committee's politics. The committee reflects Norway's politics. This is mostly portrayed positively, but sometimes there's some humbug. For example, the award sometimes reflects ankle-biting against America, yet Norway has no reluctance to live under America's nuclear protection.
The book gets more interesting as it covers more current laureates. I recommend it for those interested in the peace prize and modern international relations.
Nordlinger's style is very readable and thought provoking. Highly recommended.
Mr. Nordlinger's biographical sketches of the early winners are fascinating overview of the early 20th and late 19th century. His more contemporary portraits often do a great job of capturing the times and controversies surrounding these awards. As we find American Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush would never win a peace prize but surely should have the biggest stack of thank you letters from the people who did win. Nearly every single winner in the 21st century owes George Bush a thank you note at the very least.
Mr. Nordlinger's "parade of laureates", his term for his biographical sketches of the winners, could prove tedious in another author's hands but Mr. Nordlinger's wit, good humor and loving attention to his subject carries the day and drives the book along. It left me wishing that he had spent even more time on each laureate instead of less.
By reading this book you will not only have a better understanding of the Prize and how it is given and how it is handled you will have a better idea of the social views, ideas and fads that held sway with Western political elites through the 20th and early 21st centuries. This is book you will come to cherish having in your possession.
I always read his stuff in NR and NRO. Great sense of humor and irony. I particularly have
enjoyed the excerpts of the recipient lectures as well as the recipient introductions.
Although the Nobel committee has embarrassed themselves over the years, who hasn't!
Word to the wise: If you don't think that Ronald Reagan should not have at least been considered
for the Peace Prize, then you probably won't enjoy this book.