Buy Used
CDN$ 6.50
+ CDN$ 6.49 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Ships from the USA. Please allow 2 to 3 weeks for delivery.  Book shows minor use. Cover and Binding have minimal wear and the pages have only minimal creases. A tradition of quality and service.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 3 images

Prentice Hall Connected Mathematics Grade 8 (Single Bind) Student Editions (Hardcover) 2006 Hardcover – Jun 23 2006


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 81.86 CDN$ 6.50

Save An Additional 10% on Textbooks When you Join Amazon Student
click to open popover

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.




Product Details

  • Hardcover: 700 pages
  • Publisher: Prentice Hall (June 23 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0131656236
  • ISBN-13: 978-0131656239
  • Product Dimensions: 22 x 3.2 x 27.9 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 1.7 Kg
  • Average Customer Review: Be the first to review this item
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #2,364,499 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 2.2 out of 5 stars 13 reviews
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Great for problem solving Aug. 10 2013
By hhaines - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
Did the first scientist looking at mold growth rates know that the rate of growth would be exponential - no. They studied it and figured it out. Kids are learning to be problem solvers in this program and there is research to back up that they are prepared for high school and beyond when they are learning problem solving skills. Math in your life is not a set of exercises where you have to solve for x in 40 different problems so why should it be that way when we teach kids math. Just because something is new and different doesn't make it bad.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Be prepared for a deep understanding of math July 29 2015
By Dhamma - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I have to admit that I was skeptical of this new math after reading so many negative reviews about it. I considered myself very good at math. My father was a high school math teacher, and he used to teach me math during the summers. I got a perfect score on the math portion when I took a college entrance test in Viet Nam and went on to obtain a Ph.D. in engineering. Following my family tradition, I want to teach my kids math during the summers too so that they are better prepared when coming back to school in the Fall. I was raised in Viet Nam, and math over there was and is still very much emphasized, and I learned math via the traditional approach. After searching and searching for some good elementary school math books, I decided to use Saxon books (the 7/6 and 8/7 books) to be on the safe side as these books teach skills well, and I have heard many good things about them. However, I kept wondering about this new math and wanted to see how bad it was. Since Connected Math used books were so cheap, I first ordered the 6th grade Connected Math book for about 3 dollars. After reading it, I was hooked. I knew how to do math well, but now I realized that I did not understand math that much. That book was a real eye opener for me. So, I bought other new math books as well: the rest of the Connected Math books, the whole series of the University of Chicago (UCSMP) middle school and high school math books, Interactive Mathematics Program (IMP) math books, Mathematics: Modeling Our World series, and the most-hated Investigations in Numbers, Space and Data workbooks. I like all of them. So, now, instead of Saxon books, which I think emphasize on memorizing algorithms without much understanding, I use the UCSMP books, Connected Math books and problems from other books to teach my older kid in upper elementary school, and I use the Investigations workbooks to teach the other kid, who just finished kindergarten. With these books, their understanding of math have grown tremendously. My son, who is ready for first grade, now could understand and tackle the types of word problem that my daughter found difficult in her second grade (at the time that my daughter was in second grade, I did not discover these new math books yet). My daughter, who will go to fifth grade this Fall, can now do fraction addition/subtraction in her head, can solve real-world problems, and can tackle increasing difficult word problems. In fact, she helped her mom the other day on a recipe. The recipe was for a party of ten people, and she converted the recipe formula to fit a family of four . All these results are possible because my kids now understand math and not just do math from rote memory. I realized that it is very time consuming to teach kids using these new math books, but the benefit is worth the effort. So, by spending a couple of dollars on these used books and by spending time with them, teaching them to understand math, maybe, they will qualify for some college scholarships in the future. So, if you are like me, someone who was skeptical of this new math, give it a try because these used books are very cheap, but the result can be very rewarding.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Unconnected Math Dec 9 2013
By Ebasco Engineer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
One star is generous. First, the title is a contradiction, this math isn't "connected" to anything, including itself. The 700 pages consists of 8 100-page comic books which are in no ways connected, or dependent on an orderly progression through the book. The 8 sections are printed separately for students as "books." Good students can't determine why or where they are, can't determine why they should be learning the material, and are left with no idea what properties of the story problems (for which there are a bazillion vignettes all starting with a politically correct [and obscure] child's name) are responsible for the problems being grouped in that section of the book. For an area of study that bills itself now as a science, and has as a purpose problem solving, this mathematics program for middle schoolers is disorganized, fragmented, illogical, and pointless. Combined with the Discovery Math from Key Curriculum Press, Seattle's math students are bound to be rendered senseless from 6 to 12. I've not read over the K to 5 curriculum. Both a San Francisco math professor and Richard Feynman have spoken more eloquently about the badness of new math books, and I doubt they saw these best-worst examples. Google them. I will reiterate, for those of us who love reading math textbooks, these are torture to fight through a few sections, and hopeless to complete. The damage they do to students who truly want to learn math is unmeasurable.
10 of 14 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Supposed to make math fun....NOT Sept. 13 2012
By Janet V - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I bought this book for one reason: so that my daughter could have an extra copy at home because her backpack weighed 30 pounds. I'm selling it for the same reason: to save another child's back. After a year of using this book, here's my opinion: I HATE THIS BOOK. Here's why:

1. It will not prepare your child for high school. Heck, your kid may not even know what they are studying! Seriously, ask your eighth-grader what they are doing in math this week. "Growing, Growing Growing". What's that about? "Umm, snake populations, growing mold, cooling water, stuff like that." Hello, you're studying Expotential Equations. Next week your kid will study "Frogs, Fleas, and Painted Cubes". Whay can't you just call it Quadratic Equations? When their high school teacher asks if they've had quadratic equations, will these students reply "Was that the one with the frogs?" C'mon, these titles are for elementary school, not middle school. And what's with "Reflections, Connections, Extensions, Applications"...why not just have explanations, sample problems, and quizzes?

2. This book is the epitome of what's wrong with schools today: political correctness for it's own sake (even when irrelevant to the subject matter), attempting to entertain the student instead of teach (school is supposed to be a rigorous mental challenge, not "fun", just as teachers are supposed to be adult role models, not "friends"), the idea that students must have self-esteem before they can tackle math (instead of the reverse which is more logical: succeeding in math gives the student higher self-esteeem).

There is a superfluous photo or picture on almost every page; these are visual distractions, they do not enrich, rather they compete for students' focus. What is the purpose of a photo of a child diving into a swimming pool, next to a problem on how to measure the surface area of the pool? Is it necessary to show drawing of the painted tiles of the pool, in a problem about measuring the number of tiles for the pool?

Are the obligatory photos of politically correct kids supposed to foster "self-esteem"? My daughter and her friends immediately picked up on the pictures of the Black kid, the White kid, the Latino kid, the Asian kid...there are THREE photos of students in wheelchairs. Why?

This book tries so hard to be "relevant" and convince students that they NEED math to survive everyday life. Sorry kids but at this level, you should be over that and learning math for the sake of math: because it gives you satisfying mental challenges, and is beautiful in itself. A few of you will use it in Science/Technoolgy/Engineering/Math careers, and the rest of you will benefit from learning to think creatively.
8 of 11 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Horrible. Useless. Teaches Nothing. Jan. 30 2011
By Three Miles Down - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
For the last few years (sixth through eighth grade), we in Jefferson County Public Schools have been subjected to the use of the horrendous book that is Connected Mathematics 2. I have to say, it is the worst book ever used since Everyday Mathematics in elementary school.

For one, they try to cram so much (useless) information into one year's worth of instruction. In the beginning of eighth grade, we were still working on a seventh grade book, and have had to cut 3 books to fit into our year's curriculum in the honors program. I honestly feel that we should've just skipped the CM2 book and just went straight to College Preparatory Algebra 1.

Second, the books Kaleidoscopes, Hubcaps and Mirrors is completely and utterly ridiculous. What eighth grader doesn't understand the concept of Symmetry?

I do not recommend using this textbook. Go to the school board, and fight this!

Look for similar items by category


Feedback