Buying Options
Got a mobile device?
You’ve got a Kindle.
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
Send link
Processing your request...
By pressing "Send link", you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message and data rates may apply.
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Sherlock Holmes and the Three Poisoned Pawns Kindle Edition
by
Eddie Maguire
(Author),
Roger Jaynes
(Author),
Emanuel E Garcia
(Author)
&
0
more Format: Kindle Edition
| Emanuel E Garcia (Author) Find all the books, read about the author and more. See search results for this author |
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle Edition
$0.00 This title and over 1 million more available with Kindle Unlimited $2.99 to buy - Paperback
from $17.742 Used from $19.18 2 New from $17.74
Sherlock Holmes and the Three Poisoned Pawns includes three separate Sherlock Holmes adventures, each ingenious and entertaining in their own right.
At some stage during each of the short stories someone or something, which at first appears trivial, reveals itself to be far more significant - like a pawn which is said to be ‘poisoned’ in the game of chess.
The first, entitled The Mystery of Hamlet , by Emmanuel E. Garcia is set in 1938. Holmes is considerably older but his appetite for deciphering mysteries remains as strong as ever. He applies his science of deduction to literature and the possibility of a new interpretation of Shakespeare’s classic, Hamlet.
The second story, Roger Jayne’s The Belgravian Letter , settles in the more familiar surroundings of London and concerns the death of Sir Arthur Wilcox, a high-ranking civil servant. Sir Arthur was set to depart for Athens on an important diplomatic mission; however the discovery of his dead body next to his open safe sparks fears regarding the safety of the Government. Nonetheless, Sherlock Holmes has other ideas.
Finally, Eddie Maguire provides an extraordinary account in The Highcliffe Invitation . Holmes and Watson are invited to Dorset for the weekend unaware that the Kaiser wishes to meet them. Soon some of the Kaiser's personal possessions go missing and what starts as a theft culminates in a potential assassination plot.
Sherlock Holmes and the Three Poisoned Pawns is a gripping collection of British murder mysteries.
At some stage during each of the short stories someone or something, which at first appears trivial, reveals itself to be far more significant - like a pawn which is said to be ‘poisoned’ in the game of chess.
The first, entitled The Mystery of Hamlet , by Emmanuel E. Garcia is set in 1938. Holmes is considerably older but his appetite for deciphering mysteries remains as strong as ever. He applies his science of deduction to literature and the possibility of a new interpretation of Shakespeare’s classic, Hamlet.
The second story, Roger Jayne’s The Belgravian Letter , settles in the more familiar surroundings of London and concerns the death of Sir Arthur Wilcox, a high-ranking civil servant. Sir Arthur was set to depart for Athens on an important diplomatic mission; however the discovery of his dead body next to his open safe sparks fears regarding the safety of the Government. Nonetheless, Sherlock Holmes has other ideas.
Finally, Eddie Maguire provides an extraordinary account in The Highcliffe Invitation . Holmes and Watson are invited to Dorset for the weekend unaware that the Kaiser wishes to meet them. Soon some of the Kaiser's personal possessions go missing and what starts as a theft culminates in a potential assassination plot.
Sherlock Holmes and the Three Poisoned Pawns is a gripping collection of British murder mysteries.
- Publication dateDec 22 2015
- LanguageEnglish
- File size4407 KB
Kindle e-Readers
- Kindle (5th Generation)
- Kindle Keyboard
- Kindle DX
- Kindle (2nd Generation)
- Kindle (1st Generation)
- Kindle Paperwhite
- Kindle Paperwhite (5th Generation)
- Kindle Touch
- Kindle
- Kindle Oasis
Fire Tablets
Free Kindle Reading Apps
Product details
- ASIN : B019QG38G6
- Publisher : Lume Books (Dec 22 2015)
- Language : English
- File size : 4407 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 169 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #710,270 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #1,721 in Mystery Anthologies
- #2,428 in Crime, Thriller & Mystery Anthologies
- #5,153 in British Detectives
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customers who read this book also read
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
3.3 out of 5 stars
3.3 out of 5
28 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews from other countries
SJ Coombs
1.0 out of 5 stars
Dreadful
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 2, 2016Verified Purchase
Dreadful. Story 1: a loosely camouflaged diatribe on who wrote Shakespeare's plays and Holmes as an adulterer disguised (poorly) as an investigation. Story 2: apparently written by an illiterate who doesn't know the difference between voracious and vociferous. Story 3: just not very good unfortunately.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Carl E. Ahlm
3.0 out of 5 stars
"Three short stories offering varying strength of Holmesian character and plot."
Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2016Verified Purchase
."Sherlock Holmes and the Three Poisoned Pawns" is in reality three short stories. (Sometimes, I read too quickly when getting a Holmes book for my Kindle.) I have nothing against short stories; I was just expecting a novel. However, the stories were not bad, nor were they great! Quickly, here are the "three pawns" for you to consider.
The first story, The Mystery of Hamlet , by Emmanuel E. Garcia, was perhaps the weakest of the group. Rather than being "The Game is Afoot" Holmesian mystery, it was more of a cerebral one-sided discussion touching on the premise of who was the real villain in Hamlet. Paradoxically, the Hamlet antagonist idea was the most interesting aspect in an otherwise disappointing "poisoned" story. The intellectual discussion droned on and on; now I know what my students must have felt like. Thus, I disliked first story; interesting Hamlet premise, but it didn't seem in keeping with the character nor plots one expects. I would probably give it a two of five stars. Roger Jayne’s "The Belgravian Letter," was the second story in the book. The setting is far more comfortable for the Sherlockian reader in the more familiar surroundings of London and concerns the mysterious death of Sir Arthur Wilcox, a high-ranking civil servant. Who could have done it? Were important state documents stolen What starts strong becomes predictable, and I guessed the end early on. Still, it was a solid three of five stars. The final short story is by Eddie Maguire, "The Highcliffe Invitation." It provides an extraordinary account in which Holmes and Watson are invited to countryside in Dorset for the weekend. They are unaware that the Kaiser wishes to meet them. This one is the best of the group and kept me guessing more. This one is right on the bubble between a three or a four star rating!
Each story is a comfortable reading length of 60 or 70 pages. The third story is stronger on character and plot than the other two, especially the first. Certainly, the book is a little disappointing; however, if I had it to do over again, I would still get the book. Regardless, if you enjoy Holmes, you may want to give this one a try yourself. Then, you can then judge them for yourself!
The first story, The Mystery of Hamlet , by Emmanuel E. Garcia, was perhaps the weakest of the group. Rather than being "The Game is Afoot" Holmesian mystery, it was more of a cerebral one-sided discussion touching on the premise of who was the real villain in Hamlet. Paradoxically, the Hamlet antagonist idea was the most interesting aspect in an otherwise disappointing "poisoned" story. The intellectual discussion droned on and on; now I know what my students must have felt like. Thus, I disliked first story; interesting Hamlet premise, but it didn't seem in keeping with the character nor plots one expects. I would probably give it a two of five stars. Roger Jayne’s "The Belgravian Letter," was the second story in the book. The setting is far more comfortable for the Sherlockian reader in the more familiar surroundings of London and concerns the mysterious death of Sir Arthur Wilcox, a high-ranking civil servant. Who could have done it? Were important state documents stolen What starts strong becomes predictable, and I guessed the end early on. Still, it was a solid three of five stars. The final short story is by Eddie Maguire, "The Highcliffe Invitation." It provides an extraordinary account in which Holmes and Watson are invited to countryside in Dorset for the weekend. They are unaware that the Kaiser wishes to meet them. This one is the best of the group and kept me guessing more. This one is right on the bubble between a three or a four star rating!
Each story is a comfortable reading length of 60 or 70 pages. The third story is stronger on character and plot than the other two, especially the first. Certainly, the book is a little disappointing; however, if I had it to do over again, I would still get the book. Regardless, if you enjoy Holmes, you may want to give this one a try yourself. Then, you can then judge them for yourself!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
marisol
5.0 out of 5 stars
Haunting
Reviewed in the United States on July 5, 2015Verified Purchase
This is an unusual, visionary, and at some level deeply disturbing book whose revelation should have produced a tidal wave in the otherwise tidy pond of Hamlet's scholars. Yet, seven years after its publication, it hasn't caused so much as a ripple, although this may change quickly after the challenging and well-received production of "Hamlet" by the author, Emanuel Garcia, and a video in which he elaborates on his discovery.
Given the protagonists, a Bard preoccupied with ghosts, a master sleuth's author with spirits, it is tempting to see a supernatural hand at work, using E. Garcia as a medium. The solution has the simplicity and elegance of a mathematical equation, conveyed in an equally elegant and supple style. The author's usual attention to structure is even more rigorous here, as the "architect and stage manager" (Watson about Holmes) shapes the story into a series of concentric circles whose ripples create unstable and murky mirrors for narcissistic selves, perhaps not excluding our own. The author's practice in and passion for the theater is palpable: the sensual presence of the stage draws us in as we may lose the requisite impartiality of the observer.
This is a play on mistaken identities (of persons or true character), recessed identities (more or less successfully concealed from oneself or from others), a hint of bi-gendered identities, unequivocally competing identities, e.g. hero, narrator, author(s), "auteurs", not to mention creators. But far from being a comedy of errors, it is treated in the tragic mode. However, the author's irrepressible humor and taste for risqué asides and twists bring considerable comic relief, while the book climaxes in an ambiguous ending that can be read as either optimistic or pessimistic or both.
Between the war in Denmark, the eve of the contemporary (at the time of Conan Doyle) Second World War and an uncertain state of the world in the early twenty-first century, the themes of loyalty, deception and treachery, not to mention identity, are made even more poignant. Add to the mix the aging team of Watson and Holmes, still robust and sharp but who may be meeting for the last time, and we readers may be called upon to reevaluate many of the values and beliefs that sustain us.
This is not meant as a cliché, but this story is haunting, and will not let you go. Even with my easy acquiescence to the Hamlet's solution, each successive reading has brought forth new questions, new doubts. Just as the play Hamlet will never be a case closed, I suspect that neither will this book.
Given the protagonists, a Bard preoccupied with ghosts, a master sleuth's author with spirits, it is tempting to see a supernatural hand at work, using E. Garcia as a medium. The solution has the simplicity and elegance of a mathematical equation, conveyed in an equally elegant and supple style. The author's usual attention to structure is even more rigorous here, as the "architect and stage manager" (Watson about Holmes) shapes the story into a series of concentric circles whose ripples create unstable and murky mirrors for narcissistic selves, perhaps not excluding our own. The author's practice in and passion for the theater is palpable: the sensual presence of the stage draws us in as we may lose the requisite impartiality of the observer.
This is a play on mistaken identities (of persons or true character), recessed identities (more or less successfully concealed from oneself or from others), a hint of bi-gendered identities, unequivocally competing identities, e.g. hero, narrator, author(s), "auteurs", not to mention creators. But far from being a comedy of errors, it is treated in the tragic mode. However, the author's irrepressible humor and taste for risqué asides and twists bring considerable comic relief, while the book climaxes in an ambiguous ending that can be read as either optimistic or pessimistic or both.
Between the war in Denmark, the eve of the contemporary (at the time of Conan Doyle) Second World War and an uncertain state of the world in the early twenty-first century, the themes of loyalty, deception and treachery, not to mention identity, are made even more poignant. Add to the mix the aging team of Watson and Holmes, still robust and sharp but who may be meeting for the last time, and we readers may be called upon to reevaluate many of the values and beliefs that sustain us.
This is not meant as a cliché, but this story is haunting, and will not let you go. Even with my easy acquiescence to the Hamlet's solution, each successive reading has brought forth new questions, new doubts. Just as the play Hamlet will never be a case closed, I suspect that neither will this book.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Kindle Customer
1.0 out of 5 stars
Not much here...
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2017Verified Purchase
Sherlock Holmes pastiches are a separate genre of writing: some are good, some aren't. This trio of stories contains one that depicts Holmes apparently in his dotage (in 1939!) as he "solves" the "hidden mystery in Hamlet" and argues that the minor figure Horatio is the most malevolent villain ever, exceeding even Professor Moriarty in evil. The second one is humdrum, and the third--which includes Kaiser Wilhelm II--and is completely inexplicable. It seems to be a way to get Holmes to predict World War One. The title of the book is beyond understanding. If all Holmes pastiches were of the caliber of Nicholas Meyer's "7 Percent" solution this would be a better world; if they were all as mediocre as this trio we'd avoid reading anything other than the originals. If Conan Doyle could read these he'd spin in his grave.
sandy
1.0 out of 5 stars
Didn't like the first one of these
Reviewed in the United States on February 27, 2016Verified Purchase
I read the first story in this group and when Mr. Holmes is shown to be having an affair with the vicar's wife, it left me cold. This is not Sherlock at any age. I don't mind modern Sherlock stories, but don't change his basic character if you expect me to enjoy them.
When a story makes me that disgusted I won't read further in the book or any other stories associated with that author. I figure, his or her taste and mine just don't mix.
When a story makes me that disgusted I won't read further in the book or any other stories associated with that author. I figure, his or her taste and mine just don't mix.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse





