Temperament: How Music Became a Battleground for the Great Minds of Western Civilization Paperback – Feb 4 2003
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Involving mathematics, philosophy, aesthetics, religion, politics, and physics, Stuart Isacoff 's Temperament invokes the tone of a James Burke documentary. However, the focus is not on a modern invention, but rather a modern convention: that of tuning keyboards so that every key is equally in tune--and equally out of tune.
With the existing literature tending to bog down in mathematical theory or historical tuning methods, Isacoff bravely attempts to make this seemingly arcane topic interesting to the general reader. He distills the mathematics and music theory into their simplest essences, and draws apt analogies from the everyday. He also generously peppers the text with the quirks and escapades of its more flamboyant central characters; the relevance of the information is often tenuous at best, but Isacoff has obviously done his homework, and he can be forgiven some frivolity.
Less forgivable is his neglect of "well-temperament." Namesake of Bach's masterful collection of 24 pieces (one each in all the major and minor keys), the well-tempered keyboard liberated composers from the howl of badly tuned keys in the way equal temperament did, while preserving the distinct quality of each key. It was a pragmatic and aesthetically rich solution that captivated composers and theorists for decades. Yet Isacoff reserves less than two pages for its description. (Perhaps he deliberately overlooked the topic since it doesn't fit well with his casting of equal temperament's opponents as rigid, dogmatic, and impractical.)
Despite its flaws, Temperament is an accessible guide to a fascinating topic seldom discussed outside musical circles. Though the book may not invigorate hard-core theorists, the amateur musician, armchair scientist, history buff, or plain old curious can glean plenty from it. The advent of digital keyboards--some of which can be tuned to historical temperaments at the flip of a switch--makes this an ideal time for the topic to be rejuvenated. --Todd Gehman --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Publishers Weekly
Isacoff, editor-in-chief of Piano Today magazine, tells the worthy tale of how musical temperament the familiar, seemingly fixed relationships between notes on an instrumental scale came to be taken for granted. After centuries of an accepted belief in the mathematical and divine governance of music, the 17th century saw the growth of a fierce debate over experimental new tuning methods. In the 18th century, the modern keyboard allowed for a new kind of tuning, known as equal temperament, whereby each pitch is equally distanced. New musical possibilities opened up, changing composition forever. Isacoff traces music theory contributions by da Vinci, Newton, Descartes, Kepler and Rameau. Unfortunately, he sometimes clumsily attempts to keep his audience's attention with irrelevant, if salacious, gossip e.g., philosopher Robert Hooke "recorded his orgasms in a diary," and King Louis XIV refused to eat with a fork. Meanwhile, he gives relatively short shrift to Kepler and Galileo. His ambitious historical canvas uses extensive secondary sources, but there are research gaps, such as his outdated portrait of Isaac Newton as a total "ascetic." Nevertheless, this harmonics drama will excite music geeks and music historians. (Nov. 24)Forecast: Knopf's prestige guarantees sales to major music collections, and Isacoff's national media appearances (NPR, etc.) may mean good general sales.
Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title. See all Product Description
Top Customer Reviews
Barbour and Isacoff don't say that they did, and they dance carefully around it while offering a facade of musical objectivity. But, the historical SWEEP they present still gives that incorrect impression, overall, because of the way they measure value by their own expectations (the modern triumph over supposedly more ignorant methods) instead of the positive expectations of the people who composed tonal music. I found it remarkable that as early as page 6 Isacoff cites equal temperament as "the final solution"...a chillingly accurate assessment, as to the way it eliminates diversity from tonal music, the way somebody else's "final solution" eliminated human beings.
Isacoff, to his credit, tries to present various sides of the historical issues; but the effort fails as he consistently errs on the side of embracing scientific triumph (as if equal temperament is the only scientifically plausible solution). He seems bewildered whenever presenting a scientist who never succumbed to the lure of the modern "final solution". More problematic, he tries too hard to sculpt personality profiles around all the major players in the historical record, and his observations degenerate into "ad hominem" dismissals of people he'd rather not have us believe.Read more ›
As a harpsichordist, I'm perhaps a little more flexible on the subject of an ideal temperament that is all things to all people, because my experience says there's no such thing. Of the various solutions that have been tried along the way, most of them served the needs of those who used them at the time. In fact, I was disappointed that his website sound samples included Chopin in just intonation and equal temperament, but no Byrd or Frescobaldi in meantone or Faenza Codex in Pythagorean, just to show us what all of those systems CAN do--especially on instruments other than the Steinway grand piano. Believe me, it's a revelation!
On the other hand, when he writes about phenomena such as Cipriano da Rore's _Quidnam non ebrietas_, it would be much more helpful to include a score and a brief explanation of the rules of _musica ficta_ (which were what caused all the trouble in the first place). I happen to own other books which include these, but I shouldn't need to consult my personal music library to read a book that is "for general audiences!"
On the other hand, temperament is one of the most obscure and complicated elements of music, and even some musicians couldn't care less about it. So a book on temperament that made it to major bookstore chains is no small achievement. Still, the question of the book's audience is a complicated one... those of us who care about temperament to begin with could do with a few more musical examples interspersed with the text, whereas for those to whom temperament is a new concept, the idea of a smaller or larger fifth might need a bit more clarification.
Most troubling to me, however, was the writer's obvious bias towards equal temperament and towards the piano. For him, the whole of western history (and a lot of sex...) has existed with the purpose of developing and embracing the equal temperament, and that pinnacle among instruments, the piano. To those of us who like the sound of a harpsichord, or use different temperaments to achieve more in-tune music, the book's conclusion, and it's author's bias, is unhelpful.
Still I would recommend the book as a read, with the added stipulation that the reader then go out and listen to an early music concert in meantone.
in one exciting page after another.
This ouvre goes far beyond the fine tuning of instruments. It has an informed subtext that deals with the human 'race' to involve technology with the workings of the human spirit, and how such endeavors at times expose some nasty instincts for competition, achivement and even jealousy. (An evolutionary emotional lag, perhaps, for his characters could be contemporary everymen!).
Lest the reader be concerned that this book may be too stuffy, too academic or too boring, Mr. Isacoff has provided clever and light-hearted, albeit revelatory, commentary on the ultimate query: From Pythagoras to Pop, Just how does one come up with the resource to fine tune basic human temperatment? Alas, the greatest challenge of all! This book is a MUST READ!!! Many thanks to Mr. Isacoff.
Most recent customer reviews
The book is too anecdotal, an amateurish cultural history. Many of the materials are not quite relevant. If the author stuck to the subject the pages could be two-third less. Read morePublished on March 16 2004
I thoroughly enjoyed this book and, for the first time in my life, feel that I actually understand the issues around temperament. Read morePublished on Feb. 13 2004 by P. Vogel
This was a fantastic read! Remember that this book is a LAY book! So certain 'scientific' expectations should be a bit relaxed. Read morePublished on Aug. 23 2003
The theme of this book, the history behind modern tuning and its effect on the development of modern music and modern keyboard instruments, is a fascinating one. Sadly, Mr. Read morePublished on May 16 2003
This book did even more than what I hoped it would do.
First of all, it grabbed my attention. I didn't even know there was problem with our musical scale, let alone a... Read more
I'm a pianist and I've read Temperament for the third time. Stuart Isacoff is an excellent writer who has explained tempered-tuning and how it developed throughout the history of... Read morePublished on Oct. 8 2002 by Walter Norris
I cannot give this book enough praise. In an engrossing 230 pages, I was both time traveler and world traveler as I discovered the forces that gave birth to the piano and chromatic... Read morePublished on Sept. 22 2002 by G. Coleman
I found the book extremely absorbing and interesting, more for its philosophic, religious, scientific, artistic, and historic observations than for its actual musical content. Read morePublished on July 18 2002 by EqualTempTuner
This is one of the most readable books on the history of temperment I have ever encountered! If you have ever wanted to know a little something about European music history, or... Read morePublished on June 11 2002 by Beth