CDN$ 7.53
  • List Price: CDN$ 9.99
  • You Save: CDN$ 2.46 (25%)
FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
The Virtue of Selfishness... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 4 images

The Virtue of Selfishness: Fiftieth Anniversary Edition Mass Market Paperback – Nov 1 1964

3.6 out of 5 stars 109 customer reviews

See all 24 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 58.36
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 0.01
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 7.53
CDN$ 0.74 CDN$ 0.01

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child
click to open popover


Frequently Bought Together

  • The Virtue of Selfishness: Fiftieth Anniversary Edition
  • +
  • Atlas Shrugged
  • +
  • The Fountainhead
Total price: CDN$ 38.64
Buy the selected items together

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.




Product Details

  • Mass Market Paperback: 176 pages
  • Publisher: Signet; 50 edition (Nov. 1 1964)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0451163931
  • ISBN-13: 978-0451163936
  • Product Dimensions: 10.6 x 1.2 x 17.4 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 45 g
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars 109 customer reviews
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #31,289 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

From Library Journal

The problem with Rand is easily detectable by careful listeners of this production: a good essayist with a flair for the dramatic turn of phrase, she wasted her obvious writing skills in an effort to support outlandish personal opinions cloaked in the guise of logic. An absolutist thinker, she devotes one whole essay to an effort to persuade us that we really should see things as black and white, with no shades of gray. Born in Soviet Russia, Rand so despised socialism and collectivist thinking that she leapt to the furthest extreme possible to become the champion of unbridled capitalism, the rights of the individual at the expense of the community, and the diminution of all regulation by the state, with the exception of a judicial system and the control of crime. Among the sadly dated ideas she conveys are the attitude that homosexuals are mutant symptoms of a sick society and the belief that anyone with an interest in internationalism is a "one world" proponent. To use one of her own favored words, Rand's political and social philosophy is critically "muddled." C.M. Herbert's voice is efficient and cold, making it a perfect choice for the narration of this author's work. Recommended only as documentation of an anomaly in the history of ideas. Mark Pumphrey, Polk Cty. P.L., Columbus, NC
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

Every book by Ayn Rand published in her lifetime is still in print, and hundreds of thousands of copies are sold each year, so far totalling more than twenty million. Several new volumes have been published posthumously. Her vision of man and her philosophy for living on earth have changed the lives of thousands of readers and launched a philosophic movement with a growing impact on American culture.


 
 

See all Product Description

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Mass Market Paperback
Many years ago while discussing the Chrysler bail-out with two colleagues, they mentioned that Lee Iacoca, in pursuing the government action, was pursuing his "self-interest". The discussion on government interference in economic matters interestingly took place in the context of a debate on the contents of this book. Listening to me defend its concept of self-interest and why I thought humans should indeed pursue their self-interest, they seem perplexed that I was objecting vociferously to the Chrysler bail-out. After all, was not Lee Iacoca pursuing his self-interests when he arranged the government bail-out?
This conversation, done with two people who are now fairly well-known philosophers, illustrates the deep bias surrounding the concept of self-interest. The fact that Lee Iacoca thought he was pursuing his self-interest in arranging the bail-out does not mean that it really was in his self-interest. If a person is lost in a forest and starving, and then spots a mushroom he/she believes is nutritious but in fact is poisonous, are we to accept that the eating of the mushroom is in the person's interest? The fact that we believe something is in our interest does not make it so.
The author of this book makes a brilliant case for the ethics of self-interest, with this concept being rooted in the organism's identity. It is the characteristics of the organism that determine what is good or bad for it. Ethical values arise when the organism can exhibit choice over a collection of alternatives, and is distinctly self-aware of these choices. And due to the complexity of both the organism and the environment, the context will determine the choices available to the organism.
Read more ›
5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Mass Market Paperback Verified Purchase
If you like or are impressed by the way Dr. House thinks and acts, you might find the root of his philosophy in here.

I will admit that there are things that you will probably not agree with in this whole philosophy.
First, like many "perfect" philosophies, it is ultimately a utopia, probably unrealisable in practice, for its ideas can only work if the whole of humanity agreed on them up-front.
Second, don't forget that these ideas were written in a certain era, by a person who has lived through very specific things. In her time, there wasn't the same weight as today on the argument that the Earth might someday not have enough resources to satisfy everyone's endless greed. So of course she thought a single person should have the right to accumulate as much riches as he wants, if he can.

But despite its few flaws in consequence, the ontology is superb, a model of ethics as prescribed not by "the others", but by oneself. One, even alone on a desert island, is subject to ethics, call it self-respect if you will. It is refreshing to find a sound system of thought that does not advocate that the only way to be a good person is to sacrifice yourself to others.

Whether you agree ot not, I think any reasonable person should either accept these ideas, or be prepared to word a sound defense against them. But that's just me. I'm that selfish.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Audio CD
I recommend this book over Ayn Rand's novels. You don't have to put up with hundreds of pages of the conversations of Howard Roark, Dominique and John Galt. This reader is always surprised by the perennial claim that the author's Fountainhead novel is rated second on the all time best seller list after the Bible. For the reader who wants some exposure to Ayn Rand's philosophy called Objectivism, this book, "The Virtue of Selfishness" is the way to go. This way the reader can cut out the middleman and get the philosophy straight from the author. You actually get a more well rounded view of her philosophy. As a reader who tackled both the Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, I consider my time was better spent with this book. My problem with this book is that I feel the author could have done a better job explaining how Objectivism would work within a society, not just the individual. Ayn Rand extols pure capitalism and the U.S.A. was her adopted country, and the country closest to her ideal. Why didn't she mention or explain away examples such as J.P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie or John D. Rockefeller where the big winners can actually change the rules of the game from "free for all capitalism" to monopoly. The book is also
silent on the segment of society requiring charity. What would be the effect on a society based solely on Ayn Rand's philosophy ?
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: Mass Market Paperback
I'm giving this 4 stars because if you want any of Rand's nonfiction works, you want this one. Also, if you are at all interested in Rand's ideas outside of fiction, this is probably the collection of her essays that gets to the point fastest.
This book contains, in an essay called The Objectvist Ethics, Rand's "main ethical argument". In discussion forums about Rand's ideas, people talk about this central argument alot: Rand's justification for egoism, Rand's unique usage of the word "selfish", and so on. Well, this is the book where Rand actually states these views, and makes her arguments. If you want to read the original, this is it.
If it matters, I think this book is also important for anyone curious about Rand's philosophy, because her main ethical argument, in the essay I mentioned, is very bad. The entire thing hinges on abusing the heck out of the word "value" and tossing around forceful rhetoric about "life and death". I read it when I was younger, and never could tell what the point was, so I told myself I would read it again later. Well, I finally got around to it a few months ago, and it was very disappointing. In over 25 pages of essay, there are only one to two pages of real philosophic argument. Moreover, I've since learned that the essay, Rand's main ethical argument, was originally a speech and has simply been transcribed into essay form!
It is very disappointing, especially for an author so well-regarded for her fiction, and especially for all the hype that surrounds her on the Internet. The vision of life Rand presents with the heroes in her novels sure feels nobel, but when she tries to sit down and do philosophy, it comes out worse than mediocre. This is the nonfiction Rand book that makes these flaws most obvious. Her other nonfiction works are mainly political.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse

Most recent customer reviews



Feedback