Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream Hardcover – Jan. 1 2003
Americans have always been the world's most anxiously enthusiastic consumers of "enhancement technologies." There is nothing novel about our use of Prozac and Viagra, or in our yearning toward cosmetic surgery and Botox injections, except the names of the drugs and the procedures. With the success of each new medical technology, a familiar pattern of response surfaces: public hand-wringing, an occasional congressional hearing, calls for self-reliance. "We have created in America a culture of drugs." The speaker? Richard Nixon.
Better Than Well offers a diagnosis rather than an argument. Why do we feel uneasy about these drugs, procedures, and therapies even while we embrace them? Where do we draw the line between self and society? Why do we seek self-realization in ways so heavily influenced by cultural conformity?
This wise, humane, and provocative book traces the fault lines in our peculiarly obsessive pursuit of happiness.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateJan. 1 2003
- Dimensions15.88 x 3.18 x 24.77 cm
- ISBN-10039305201X
- ISBN-13978-0393052015
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product description
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; 1st edition (Jan. 1 2003)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 039305201X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393052015
- Item weight : 675 g
- Dimensions : 15.88 x 3.18 x 24.77 cm
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Carl Elliott is a professor of philosophy at the University of Minnesota. Trained in medicine as well as philosophy, Elliott is the recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship, a National Endowment for the Humanities Public Scholar Award, the Cary and Ann Maguire Chair in Ethics and American History at the Library of Congress, a resident fellowship at the Rockefeller Center in Bellagio, and the Weatherhead Fellowship at the School for Advanced Research in Santa Fe. His writing has appeared in The New Yorker, The Atlantic, The New York Review of Books, The New York Times, Mother Jones and The American Scholar. He has been a visiting faculty member at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, the University of Sydney, and the University of Otago in New Zealand, where he is an affiliate of the Bioethics Centre.
Customer reviews
-
Top reviews
Top review from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Top reviews from other countries
The book, Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream is written not as a whole novel, but in different sections. The sections range from topics about the appeal of drugs such as LSD to neurological disorders such as Apotemnophilia. I believe that these divisions of sections made the read much easier and allowed me as the reader absorb a new level of knowledge on a more graspable level.
I am a student taking a Neuroscience course and our assignment was to find a book about a specific neurological disorder we were interested in. The neurological disorder I chose was Apotemnophilia. When I first researched the illness, I realized that the patients with Apotemnophilia were proclaimed self-desired amputees. Other than the illness being related to self-proclaimed amputation, I wasn't aware of the sociological relationship the illness had with the American society. The illness seemed like any other neurological disorder with damage to a specific lobe of the brain. It wasn't until I picked up this book by Carl Elliott where I realized Apotemnophilia was much more than a neurological disorder pertaining to self-amputation. Carl Elliott begins the section by introducing the illness as something not labeled completely as a neurological disorder nor a psychological disorder. Following the introduction the author begins to tell greusome stories of Apotemnophiliacs and how severe the `self-desired' amputation really was by describing ways the patients "severed their arms". With a cringed face and my imagination running wild, I proceeded to read the rest of the section to be completely turned around. Carl Elliott has proved to me that he has done an insurmountable amount of research pertaining to Apotemnophilia by talking to not only medical experts, psychologists but also patients. Carl Elliott's interview with patients seemed to make the biggest impact on my view of Apotemnophilia. The people that were interviewed would talk about how they were unable to picture themselves with these certain limbs. They felt that the limb they possessed weren't naturally theirs and amputation was necessary. The author consistently involves the opinions of every angle of the discussion which made me feel as though none of the statements were written in an unbiased manner. The amputees were not classified as anything more than `wannabes' - a term Elliott used to describe the apotemnophiliacs and not as a degrading fashion, and the psychiatrists and doctors were represented professionally. Elliott makes a strong effort to make sure that the reader understands every point of view on a professional level. It was then when I realized that this simple "neurological disorder" was much more than damage to a particular lobe on the brain.
The first thing I noticed in this book that really caught my attention was the author's choice of words. When I was searching for scientific novels about a neurological disorder, my greatest fear was that I would be stuck with a novel with unbelievable vocabulary beyond my comprehension and that I would have the most difficult time understanding the simplest concepts. My presumption was definitely proven wrong when I picked up Better Than Well. Carl Elliott presents his ideas with not only simplistic statements, but his statements are filled with scientific background and knowledge. I felt that with the knowledge I had going into the book was definitely not tested when reading the novel. I was incredibly pleased with the way Elliott wrote the book and presented it to his readers. The second thing I noticed in this book that caught my attention was the dialog he included in the text. Again with my assumptions, I assumed that a scientific novel about something as serious as neurological disorders, drugs and American society toward medicine would have no form of dialog whatsoever. However, I was definitely proven wrong when I picked up this book. Elliott seemed to really have done his research and it showed in this novel. He actively interviewed patients, physicians and psychiatrists and included their dialog and personal statements in the text. An example that really came to mind when thinking about dialog in this novel was when Elliott wrote about a woman with apotemnophilia. The woman was asked to describe the "life-changing" experience she had with an amputee as a child. The similarity Elliott found within all the apotemnophiliac patients is that they have had this ideal image of the perfect body encased in their minds as early as the age of 6. The patients have no recollection of the last time they did not want an amputation. The woman that Elliott decided to include in his novel made an impact on my personal feelings when I realized that people like this really do exist and apotemnophilia is more than a neurological disorder. The woman expressed that when she was three years old she met a man who was completely missing all four of his fingers on his hand. Ever since the woman met this man, she has had the strange fascination for amputees. This experience caused her to realize that she was interested in women amputees who were "missing parts of their arms and wore hook prostheses". Although this seemed like an unusual statement, Elliott makes it incredibly clear that statements like this is very normal for people diagnosed with apotemnophilia. The last element that caught my attention was Elliott's ability to bring in different ends of each discussion into play. Again, like the apotemnophilia topic, Elliott brought in the discussion of whether or not surgically removing perfect limbs is an unethical decision made by physicians. Before reading this book, the medical side of the apotemnophilia topic never occurred to me. Being new to the topic, I always believed that the patients had every right to want to amputate whichever limb they wanted to amputate. However, Elliott brought in a new perspective - an ethical perspective into play. Is it ethically correct to amputate a healthy limb? Is it considered as surgical treatment for the disease to make emotionally unhappy patients finally satisfied with their body? Is it considered as plastic surgery? These are all the points that Elliott played in with the text.
Overall, I was incredibly impressed with this novel. I never would have expected a novel based on American society in relation to medicine to be an easy read with interesting topics. I was able to dive straight into the book and finish the last page with complete satisfaction. I have no regrets purchasing this book and would recommend this book without a doubt to anyone who is interested in such a topic.


