Buy new:
$34.31$34.31
FREE delivery:
Friday, Nov 24
Ships from: Amazon.ca Sold by: Amazon.ca
Buy used: $20.13
Buy new: $34.31
2.8 km | POINTE-AUX-TREMBLES H1A 1R0
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City Hardcover – Deckle Edge, March 1 2016
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
Finalist for the 2016 Kirkus Prize for Nonfiction
From Harvard sociologist and MacArthur "Genius" Matthew Desmond, a landmark work of scholarship and reportage that will forever change the way we look at poverty in America
In this brilliant,heartbreaking book, Matthew Desmond takes us into the poorest neighborhoods of Milwaukee to tell the story of eight families on the edge. Arleen is a single mother trying to raise her two sons on the $20 a month she has left after paying for their rundown apartment. Scott is a gentle nurse consumed by a heroin addiction. Lamar, a man with no legs and a neighborhood full of boys to look after, tries to work his way out of debt. Vanetta participates in a botched stickup after her hours are cut. All are spending almost everything they have on rent, and all have fallen behind.
The fates of these families are in the hands of two landlords: Sherrena Tarver, a former schoolteacher turned inner-city entrepreneur, and Tobin Charney, who runs one of the worst trailer parks in Milwaukee. They loathe some of their tenants and are fond of others, but as Sherrena puts it, “Love don’t pay the bills.” She moves to evict Arleen and her boys a few days before Christmas.
Even in the most desolate areas of American cities, evictions used to be rare. But today, most poor renting families are spending more than half of their income on housing, and eviction has become ordinary, especially for single mothers. In vivid, intimate prose, Desmond provides a ground-level view of one of the most urgent issues facing America today. As we see families forced into shelters, squalid apartments, or more dangerous neighborhoods, we bear witness to the human cost of America’s vast inequality—and to people’s determination and intelligence in the face of hardship.
Based on years of embedded fieldwork and painstakingly gathered data, this masterful book transforms our understanding of extreme poverty and economic exploitation while providing fresh ideas for solving a devastating, uniquely American problem. Its unforgettable scenes of hope and loss remind us of the centrality of home, without which nothing else is possible.
- Print length432 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown
- Publication dateMarch 1 2016
- Dimensions16.81 x 3.45 x 24.33 cm
- ISBN-100553447432
- ISBN-13978-0553447439
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
In Defense of Housing: The Politics of CrisisPeter MarcusePaperbackFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it by Friday, Nov 24
Today, the majority of poor renting families in America spend over half of their income on housing, and at least one in four dedicates over 70 percent to paying the rent and keeping the lights on.Highlighted by 4,736 Kindle readers
To Sammy, Pastor Daryl, and others, Larraine was poor because she threw money away. But the reverse was more true. Larraine threw money away because she was poor.Highlighted by 3,250 Kindle readers
From the Publisher
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Product description
From Amazon
Through both personal stories and data, Desmond proves that eviction undermines self, family, and community, bearing down disproportionately hard on women with children. In Milwaukee, being behind on rent gives landlords the opening to serve an eviction notice, which leads to a court date. On the face of it, it may seem easy to side with the landlords—of course tenants should pay their rent. But as Evicted pulls back layer after layer, what’s exposed is a cycle of hurt that all parties—landlord, tenant, city—inflict on one another. Whether readers agree with Desmond’s conclusions for how to break this cycle in order to strengthen families and neighborhoods, it’s obvious by the end of Evicted that there is no easy fix, and that people—some addicts, some criminals—will slip through the cracks. But it should be just as obvious that we must still try.
—Adrian LiangReview
A Washington Post Best Book of 2016
Longlisted for the 2016 800-CEO-READ Business Book Award
A Politico 50 Best Book of the Year
One of Publishers Weekly's Best Books of 2016
A New York Times Editors' Choice
One of Wall Street Journal's Hottest Spring Nonfiction Books
One of O: The Oprah Magazine's 10 Titles to Pick Up Now
One of Vulture's 8 Books You Need to Read This Month
One of BuzzFeed's 14 Most Buzzed About Books of 2016
One of The Guardian's Best Holiday Reads 2016
“An exhaustively researched, vividly realized and above all, unignorable book—after Evicted, it will no longer be possible to have a serious discussion about poverty without having a serious discussion about housing.”
—Jennifer Senior, New York Times
"Astonishing...Desmond is an academic who teaches at Harvard—a sociologist or, you could say, an ethnographer. But I would like to claim him as a journalist too, and one who, like Katherine Boo in her study of a Mumbai slum, has set a new standard for reporting on poverty."
—Barbara Ehrenreich, New York Times Book Review
“Written with the vividness of a novel, [Evicted] offers a dark mirror of middle-class America’s obsession with real estate, laying bare the workings of the low end of the market, where evictions have become just another part of an often lucrative business model.”
—Jennifer Schuessler, New York Times
"It doesn't happen every week (or every month, or even year), but every once in a while a book comes along that changes the national conversation... Evicted looks to be one of those books."
—Pamela Paul, editor of the New York Times Book Review
“An essential piece of reportage about poverty and profit in urban America.”
—Geoff Dyer,The Guardian’s Best Holiday Reads 2016
"Should be required reading in an election year, or any other."
—Entertainment Weekly
“Thank you, Matthew Desmond. Thank you for writing about destitution in America with astonishing specificity yet without voyeurism or judgment. Thank you for showing it is possible to compose spare, beautiful prose about a complicated policy problem. Thank you for giving flesh and life to our squabbles over inequality, so easily consigned to quintiles and zero-sum percentages. Thank you for proving that the struggle to keep a roof over one’s head is a cause, not just a characteristic of poverty... Evicted is an extraordinary feat of reporting and ethnography. Desmond has made it impossible to ever again consider poverty in America without tackling the role of housing—and without grappling with Evicted.”
—Washington Post
“Powerful, monstrously effective…[Evicted] documents with impressive steadiness of purpose and command of detail the lives of impoverished renters at the bottom of Milwaukee’s housing market…In describing the plight of these people, Desmond reveals the confluence of seemingly unrelated forces that have conspired to create a thoroughly humiliated class of the almost or soon-to-be homeless…But the power of this book abides in the indelible impression left by its stories.”
—Jill Leovy, The American Scholar
“Gripping and important…Desmond, a Harvard sociologist, cites plenty of statistics but it’s his ethnographic gift that lends the work such force. He’s one of a rare academic breed: a poverty expert who engages with the poor. His portraits are vivid and unsettling…It’s not easy to show desperate people using drugs or selling sex and still convey their courage and dignity. Evicted pulls it off.”
—Jason DeParle, New York Review of Books
“[Desmond] tells a complex, achingly powerful story… There have been many well-received urban ethnographies in recent years, from Sudhir Venkatesh’s Gang Leader for a Day to Katherine Boo’s Behind the Beautiful Forevers. Desmond’s Evicted surely deserves to takes [its] place among these. It is an exquisitely crafted, meticulously researched exploration of life on the margins, providing a voice to people who have been shamefully ignored—or, worse, demonized—by opinion makers over the course of decades.”
—The Boston Globe
"[An] impressive work of scholarship... novelistically detailed... As Mr. Desmond points out, eviction has been neglected by urban sociologists, so his account fills a gap. His methodology is scrupulous."
—Wall Street Journal
"A shattering account of life on the American fringe, Matthew Desmond’s Evicted shows the reality of a housing crisis that few among the political or media elite ever think much about, let alone address. It takes us to the center of what would be seen as an emergency of significant proportions if the poor had any legitimate political agency in American life."
—The New Republic
“Wrenching and revelatory… Other sociologists have ventured before into the realm of popular literature… but none in recent memory have so successfully bridged in a single work the demands of the academy (statistical studies and deep reviews of the existing literature) and the narrative necessity of showing what has brought these beautiful, flawed humans to their miseries… A powerfully convincing book that examines the poor’s impossible housing situation at point-blank range.”
—The Nation
“Extraordinary… I can’t remember when an ethnographic study so deepened my understanding of American life."
—Katha Pollitt, The Guardian
“Evicted stands among the very best of the social justice books… The book is meticulously reported and beautifully written, balancing statistics with family stories that draw you in and keep you there. I hope that all the people who read and loved Katherine Boo’s Behind the Beautiful Forevers: Life, Death, and Hope in a Mumbai Undercity will give Evicted a chance.”
—Ann Patchett, author of Bel Canto
“Like Katherine Boo’s Behind the Beautiful Forevers, this brilliant book is reportage with the depth and force of fiction. Its eye-opening details and data offer a new way to look at the affordable-housing crisis, the forces that perpetuate poverty and the policies we need to fix a crazily stacked deck.”
—MORE Magazine
"[Evicted] is harrowing, heartbreaking, and heavily researched, and the plight of the characters will remain with you long after you close the book's pages... Desmond's meticulousness shows how precision is not at odds with compassionate storytelling of the underprivileged. Indeed, [it] is the respect that Evicted shows for its characters' flaws and mistakes that makes the book impossible to forget."
—Christian Science Monitor
“A superb new book.”
—Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
"The poverty of others brings up terrible questions of there-but-for-the-grace-of-God and what if, were your circumstances or skin color or gender different, that could be you. Your gaze pulls away. But Desmond writes so powerfully and with such persuasive math that he turns your head back and keeps it there: Yes, it could be you. But if home is so crucial a place that its loss causes this much pain, Evicted argues, making it possible for more of us might change everything.”
—VICE
"Evicted is a rich, empathetic feat of storytelling and fieldwork."
—Mother Jones
"Evicted successfully interweaves the narratives of white characters living in a trailer park at the most southern point of Milwaukee with landlords and tenants in the sprawling black ghetto of the city’s North Side... Desmond’s book manages to be a deeply moral work, a successful nonfiction narrative, and a sweeping academic survey—all while bringing new research to his academic field and to the public’s attention."
—Slate
“Evicted is that rare work that has something genuinely new to say about poverty. Desmond makes a convincing case that policymakers and academics have overlooked the role of the private rental market, and that eviction 'is a cause, not just a condition, of poverty'...Evictions have become routine. Desmond’s book should begin to change that."
—San Francisco Chronicle
“Matthew Desmond’s new book makes an undeniable case that we need to fix this all-American tragedy.”
—Huffington Post
"[A] carefully researched, often heartbreaking book."
—Chicago Tribune
"Evicted should provoke extensive public policy discussions. It is a magnificent, richly textured book with a Tolstoyan approach: telling it like it is but with underlying compassion and a respect for the humanity of each character, major or minor."
—Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
"By immersing himself in the everyday lives of poor renters, Desmond follows in the tradition of James Agee, whose monumental 1941 book Let Us Now Praise Famous Men pounded the reader with clear-eyed and brutal descriptions of rural poverty in the Deep South."
—Minneapolis StarTribune
“Desmond seems to be that rare person who is a dedicated and careful researcher and a phenomenal writer. The stories he tells in Evicted are gripping and intimate, at the same time as compelling as a novel and painstakingly illustrating how people are trapped and what the systemic implications are of that. I literally could not put it down… [Evicted] feels like it has the potential to catalyze a movement.”
—Shelterforce
"[A] masterful, heartbreaking book… The stories in Evicted are a haunting plea for us to do the right thing by families who ache for the simple routines that build a life – evening baths in a working tub for the kids, dinner cooked in one’s own kitchen, windows and doors that keep cold and danger out, a place to call home.”
—Sojourner
“[An] unflinching, richly detailed narrative… Evicted is an important book that provides an unvarnished account of the lives of the troubled and disorganized – some would say vulnerable – poor. It is thick with detail … and represents a new installment in a tradition dating back to Jacob Riis’s How the Other Half Lives (1890)… One can find passages to admire on almost every page of Desmond’s book.”
—City Journal
“An intimate and beautiful work as poignant as it is insightful… Often you hear that an author writes well for an academic, as if he were being graded on a curve. But Desmond is a good writer, period. His prose is vivid and energetic; his physical descriptions can be small gems.”
—Bookforum
“A groundbreaking work… Desmond delivers a gripping, novelistic narrative… This stunning, remarkable book – a scholar’s 21st-century How the Other Half Lives – demands a wide audience.”
—Kirkus Reviews (starred)
“Gripping storytelling and meticulous research undergird this outstanding ethnographic study… Desmond identifies affordable housing as a leading social justice issue of our time and offers concrete solutions to the crisis.”
—Publishers Weekly (starred)
"Highly recommended."
—Library Journal (starred)
"It’s hard to paint a slumlord as a sympathetic character, but Harvard professor Desmond manages to do so in this compelling look at home evictions in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, one of America’s most segregated cities... [Desmond] does a marvelous job telling these harrowing stories of people who find themselves in bad situations, shining a light on how eviction sets people up to fail... This is essential reading.”
—Booklist (starred)
“Evicted is astonishing—a masterpiece of writing and research that fills a tremendous gap in our understanding of poverty. Taking us into some of America’s poorest neighborhoods, Desmond illustrates how eviction leads to a cascade of events, often triggered by something as simple as a child throwing a snowball at a car, that can trap families in a cycle of poverty for years. Beautiful, harrowing, and deeply human, Evicted is a must read for anyone who cares about social justice in this country. I loved it.”
—Rebecca Skloot, author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks
“This story is about one of the most basic human needs—a roof overhead—and yet Matthew Desmond has told it in sweeping, immersive, heartbreaking fashion. We enter the lives of both renters and landlords at shoulder height, experiencing their triumphs, struggles, cruelty, kindness, loss, and love. One hopes that Evicted will change public policy. It will certainly change how people respond to the world and those who inhabit it.”
—Jeff Hobbs, author of The Short and Tragic Life of Robert Peace
"This sensitive, achingly beautiful ethnography should refocus our understanding of poverty in America on the simple challenge of keeping a roof over your head."
—Robert D. Putnam, Professor of Public Policy, Harvard University, and author of Bowling Alone and Our Kids
"This is an extraordinary and crucial piece of work. Read it. Please, read it.”
—Adrian Nicole LeBlanc, author of Random Family
“Matthew Desmond tells stories of people at their most vulnerable. The characters that populate this lyrical book, many of whom are women and children, are our true American heroes, showing great courage and mythic strength against forces that are much larger than the individual. Their stories are gripping and moving—tragic, too. It’s a wonder and a shame that here, in the most prosperous country in the world, a roof over one’s head can be elusive for so many.”
—Jesmyn Ward, author of Men We Reaped and Salvage the Bones
“Evicted is a striking account of a severe and rapidly developing form of economic hardship in the U.S. Matthew Desmond’s riveting narrative of the experiences of families in Milwaukee embroiled in the process of eviction will not only shock general readers, but it will broaden the perspective of experts on urban poverty as well. This powerful, well-written book also includes revealing portraits of profit-seeking landlords, as well as important findings from comprehensive surveys to back up the ethnographic research. Evicted is that rare book that both enlightens and serves as an urgent call for action.”
—William Julius Wilson, Lewis P. and Linda L. Geyser University Professor, Harvard University, and author of When Work Disappears
"Evicted paints a detailed and heartbreaking portrait of the country’s eviction problem, and how it feeds into a cycle of poverty."
—BuzzFeed
"Sociology’s next great hope… [Desmond] is positioned to intervene in the inequality debate in a big way.”
—Chronicle of Higher Education
"The extent of Desmond’s research is truly astonishing. More astonishing still is the fact that he’s able to condense all of his observations and data into a single nonfiction volume that is both unsettling and nearly impossible to put down."
—Chicago Review of Books
“Remarkable… [Desmond] has a novelist’s eye for the telling detail and a keen ear for dialogue… [His] book is a significant literary achievement, as well as a feat of reporting underpinned by statistical labour, with details provided in copious endnotes. It is eloquent, too, on the harm eviction does — not just to individuals but also to communities and to the quality of civic and urban life.”
—The Financial Times
“Desmond’s acute observational skills, his facility with reported dialogue and his ability to wrench chaotic stories into clear prose make Evicted a vivid, if sometimes grueling, read.”
—The Independent
“A monumental and vivid study of urban poverty in America… Evicted demands attention.”
—The Sunday Times
“By exposing the difficulties these families face in obtaining and keeping decent and affordable shelter, Desmond illuminates, as few others have recently done, the lives of America’s poor and, by extension, that of the country as a whole.”
—Times Literary Supplement
"This combination of novel, experience-driven academic research and reportage is part of what makes Evicted such a valuable contribution to non-fiction literature about the lived experience of poverty."
—Rabble
“Desmond, a young sociologist whose fieldwork in Milwaukee was the subject of ‘Disrupted Lives,’ this magazine’s January-February 2014 cover article, here details several of those lives in painful, novelistic detail. But it is all fact—and all twenty-first-century American.”
—Harvard Magazine
“Evicted is more than good journalism. While Desmond’s skill as a writer creates a narrative pull, his training as a sociologist forces him to ask why we haven’t had more data on perhaps our most pressing domestic crisis.”
—Christian Century
“[Evicted] could do more than anything written in years to get fixing welfare reform and addressing urban poverty back on the national agenda. It will be hard for anyone to read Evicted and not be outraged over this nation’s treatment of millions of low-income Americans. That is a huge accomplishment, and Desmond deserves high praise.”
—Beyond Chron
"Desmond shines as an ethnographer, providing rich description and engaging accounts of the daily struggles of people attempting to find some kind of stability amidst the chaos, powerlessness, and uncertainty of poverty... The combination of rigorous research and important policy recommendations makes this work valuable to a wide audience; it is a must-read.”
—Journal of Children and Poverty
“Evicted presents a passionate, intricately crafted argument that access to stable housing makes or breaks a person’s life. Desmond weaves these human stories together with years of additional research… to build a compelling case for drastic overhauls in how the country approaches public housing. He even offers a solution to the problem he describes.”
—Progressive Magazine
"For the two or three weeks I was reading this book, it formed my topic of conversation with friends, and at night, when I went to sleep, it filled my thoughts."
—Spectator
“Riveting… [the stories] bring to mind characters from Dickens and Steinbeck.”
—America Magazine
“Desmond does more than paint a haunting picture of the poverty and instability created by housing insecurity. He tears past market ideology to show the power of landlords and the way they decide who the city will work for and how… [A] masterpiece of sociological ethnography.”
—Dissent Magazine
"It is impossible to fully convey the subtlety and energy of [Evicted]... a tour de force."
—Books and Ideas
“A compelling and compassionate ethnography… [this book] demands being read cover to cover. Matthew Desmond’s Evicted is a moving, insightful, and deeply moral text that captures powerful, devastating scenes and draws much-needed attention to the brutal and beautiful lives at the intersection of American capitalism and poverty.”
—Sapiens
"Desmond's important book might set out practical prescriptions for solutions such as improving the size of the housing voucher program, but the deeply touching portraits are what really make Evicted the heavyweight that it is. It should be mandatory reading for everyone, especially politicians and others who walk the corridors of power. That such bruising poverty can exist in the world's richest country is a scathing indictment of our regulatory policies."
—Poornima Apte, BookBrowse.com
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Business of Owning the City
Before the city yielded to winter, as cold and gray as a mechanic’s wrench, before Arleen convinced Sherrena Tarver to let her boys move into the Thirteenth Street duplex, the inner city was crackling with life. It was early September and Milwaukee was enjoying an Indian summer. Music rolled into the streets from car speakers as children played on the sidewalk or sold water bottles by the freeway entrance. Grandmothers watched from porch chairs as bare-chested black boys laughingly made their way to the basketball court.
Sherrena wound her way through the North Side, listening to R&B with her window down. Most middle-class Milwaukeeans zoomed past the inner city on the freeway. Landlords took the side streets, typically not in their Saab or Audi but in their “rent collector,” some oil-leaking, rusted-out van or truck that hauled around extension cords, ladders, maybe a loaded pistol, plumbing snakes, toolboxes, a can of Mace, nail guns, and other necessities. Sherrena usually left her lipstick-red Camaro at home and visited tenants in a beige-and-brown 1993 Chevy Suburban with 22-inch rims. The Suburban belonged to Quentin, Sherrena’s husband, business partner, and property manager. He used a screwdriver to start it.
Some white Milwaukeeans still referred to the North Side as “the core,” as they did in the 1960s, and if they ventured into it, they saw street after street of sagging duplexes, fading murals, twenty-four-hour day cares, and corner stores with wic accepted here signs. Once America’s eleventh-largest city, Milwaukee’s population had fallen below 600,000, down from over 740,000 in 1960. It showed. Abandoned properties and weedy lots where houses once stood dotted the North Side. A typical residential street had a few single-family homes owned by older folks who tended gardens and hung American flags, more duplexes or four-family apartment buildings with chipping paint and bedsheet curtains rented to struggling families, and vacant plots and empty houses with boards drilled over their doors and windows.
Sherrena saw all this, but she saw something else too. Like other seasoned landlords, she knew who owned which multifamily, which church, which bar, which street; knew its different vicissitudes of life, its shades and moods; knew which blocks were hot and drug-soaked and which were stable and quiet. She knew the ghetto’s value and how money could be made from a property that looked worthless to people who didn’t know any better.
Petite with chestnut skin, Sherrena wore a lightweight red-and-blue jacket that matched her pants, which matched her off-kilter NBA cap. She liked to laugh, a full, open-mouthed hoot, sometimes catching your shoulder as if to keep from falling. But as she turned off North Avenue on her way to pay a visit to tenants who lived near the intersection of Eighteenth and Wright Streets, she slowed down and let out a heavy sigh. Evictions were a regular part of the business, but Lamar didn’t have any legs. Sherrena was not looking forward to evicting a man without legs.
When Lamar first fell behind, Sherrena didn’t reach automatically for the eviction notice or shrug it off with a bromide about business being business. She hemmed and hawed. “I’m gonna have a hard time doing this,” she told Quentin when she could no longer ignore it. “You know that, don’t you?” Sherrena frowned.
Quentin stayed quiet and let his wife say it.
“It’s only fair,” Sherrena offered after a few silent moments of deliberation. “I feel bad for the kids. Lamar’s got them little boys in there. . . . And I love Lamar. But love don’t pay the bills.”
Sherrena had a lot of bills: mortgage payments, water charges, maintenance expenses, property taxes. Sometimes a major expense would come out of nowhere—a broken furnace, an unexpected bill from the city—and leave her close to broke until the first of the month.
“We don’t have the time to wait,” Quentin said. “While we waiting on his payment, the taxes are going up. The mortgage payment is going up.”
There was no hedging in this business. When a tenant didn’t pay $500, her landlord lost $500. When that happened, landlords with mortgages dug into their savings or their income to make sure the bank didn’t hand them a foreclosure notice. There were no euphemisms either: no “downsizing,” no “quarterly losses.” Landlords took the gains and losses directly; they saw the deprivation and waste up close. Old-timers liked recalling their first big loss, their initial breaking-in: the time a tenant tore down her own ceiling, took pictures, and convinced the court commissioner it was the landlord’s fault; the time an evicted couple stuffed socks down the sinks and turned the water on full-blast before moving out. Rookie landlords hardened or quit.
Sherrena nodded reassuringly and said, almost to herself, “I guess I got to stop feeling sorry for these people because nobody is feeling sorry for me. Last time I checked, the mortgage company still wanted their money.”
Sherrena and Quentin had met years ago, on Fond Du Lac Avenue. Quentin pulled up beside Sherrena at a red light. She had a gorgeous smile and her car stereo was turned up. He asked her to pull over. Sherrena remembered Quentin being in a Daytona, but he insisted it was the Regal. “I ain’t trying to pull nobody over in the Daytona,” he’d say, feigning offense. Quentin was well manicured, built but not muscular, with curly hair and lots of jewelry—
a thick chain, a thicker bracelet, rings. Sherrena thought he looked like a dope dealer but gave him her real number anyway. Quentin called Sherrena for three months before she agreed to let him take her out for ice cream. It took him another six years to marry her.
When Quentin pulled Sherrena over, she was a fourth-grade teacher. She talked like a teacher, calling strangers “honey” and offering motherly advice or chiding. “You know I’m fixing to fuss at you,” she would say. If she sensed your attention starting to drift, she would touch your elbow or thigh to pull you back in.
Four years after meeting Quentin, Sherrena was happy with their relationship but bored at work. After eight years in the classroom, she quit and opened a day care. But “they shut it down on a tiny technicality,” she remembered. So she went back to teaching. After her son from an earlier relationship started acting out, she began homeschooling him and tried her hand at real estate. When people asked, “Why real estate?” Sherrena would reply with some talk about “long-term residuals” or “property being the best investment out there.” But there was more to it. Sherrena shared something with other landlords: an unbending confidence that she could make it on her own without a school or a company to fall back on, without a contract or a pension or a union. She had an understanding with the universe that she could strike out into nothing and through her own gumption and intelligence come back with a good living.
Sherrena had bought a home in 1999, when prices were low. Riding the housing boom a few years later, she refinanced and pulled out $21,000 in equity. Six months later, she refinanced again, this time pulling $12,000. She used the cash to buy her first rental property: a two-unit duplex in the inner city, where housing was cheapest. Rental profits, refinancing, and private real-estate investors offering high-interest loans helped her buy more.
She learned that the rental population comprised some upper- and middle-class households who rent out of preference or circumstance, some young and transient people, and most of the city’s poor, who were excluded both from homeownership and public housing. Landlords operated in different neighborhoods, typically clustering their properties in a concentrated area. In the segregated city, this meant that landlords focused on housing certain kinds of people: white ones or black ones, poor families or college students. Sherrena decided to specialize in renting to the black poor.
Four years later, she owned thirty-six units, all in the inner city, and took to carrying a pair of cell phones with backup batteries, reading Forbes, renting office space, and accepting appointments from nine a.m. to nine p.m. Quentin quit his job and started working as Sherrena’s property manager and buying buildings of his own. Sherrena started a credit-repair business and an investment business. She purchased two fifteen-passenger vans and started Prisoner Connections LLC, which for $25 to $50 a seat transported girlfriends and mothers and children to visit their incarcerated loved ones upstate. Sherrena had found her calling: inner-city entrepreneur.
Product details
- Publisher : Crown (March 1 2016)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0553447432
- ISBN-13 : 978-0553447439
- Item weight : 743 g
- Dimensions : 16.81 x 3.45 x 24.33 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: #206,852 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #164 in Urban Communities
- #251 in Sociology of Class
- #512 in Poverty (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Matthew Desmond is social scientist and urban ethnographer. He is the Maurice P. During Professor of Sociology and the Director of the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. He is also a Contributing Writer for The New York Times Magazine.
Desmond is the author of over fifty academic studies and several books, including "Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City," which won the Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction, National Book Critics Circle Award, Carnegie Medal, and PEN / John Kenneth Galbraith Award for Nonfiction.
"Evicted" was listed as one of the Best Books of 2016 by The New York Times, New Yorker, Washington Post, National Public Radio, and several other outlets. It has been named one of the Best 50 Nonfiction Books of the Last 100 Years and was included in the 100 Best Social Policy Books of All Time.
Desmond's research and reporting focuses on American poverty and public policy. He is the recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship, the American Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award, and is an elected member of the American Philosophical Society. He has been listed among the Politico 50, as one of “fifty people across the country who are most influencing the national political debate.”
Customer reviews
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
While I don't necessarily agree with all of the author's policy recommendations (made at the very end, the book itself doesn't get into this as much), this clearly shows that there needs to be much more support for those people who are struggling on the margin but have the potential to recover. At times, you will find the characters frustrating and you will want to give upon them for their repeatedly poor decisions (see: Lobster on Foodstamps), but they are also so human, and so you will also find yourself rooting for their redemption. After all, doesn't everyone deserve a second chance?
A call to action for Government in all western countries. We hand wring over the problems of the third world and send aid to be stolen by the local "big men". We ignore those in need in our own communities. We need to start looking to our own problems. It is a sin that this book could be written.
The author does a really great job representing both the landlords and tenants in a relatable way. I felt like I completely understood where each party was coming from, and likely would have acted the same way given their situations. It gave an entirely new perspective on this issue (which I, admittedly, have no personal experience with).
Top reviews from other countries
So, with evictions on my mind, I found this book, thinking that it might be a good overview of the subject, and, in general, have some historic perspectives and data, give some examples of specific evictions, and on and on in this vein. That is not how the book goes. But that does not mean that I did not appreciate the book, for my purposes, in the end. I did and do. I found the book to be a compelling read.
Most of the book takes place between May 2008 and December 2009. And the author points out that most poor households pay up to 50% or more for their rent. He also tells us that landlords are the ones that decide who lives where, racially, financially, socially.
But, in fact, the first 300 pages of the book pretty much only involve the details of the lives of eight tenant households in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All of them are very familiar with evictions. Most will face them, over and over again.
In many ways, the eight tenant households featured in the book are their own worst enemies. These are not the typical working-class households, who, because of periodic hard times, find themselves behind on rent. No, most of these folks have problems with drugs, mental illness, and all kinds of issues. They are, for the most part, adults who are going nowhere in life, mainly due to no fault but their own.
Weaved into all this are details of a landlord couple, who are very good at what they do, are making a ton of money doing it, and love the business they are in. And along the way, there are dozens of gotchas in the book, which, in some ways, is written as a mystery novel that emits clues to its outcome, as it goes.
The author devoted several years of his life to the subject of evictions and writing the book. In kind of a Barbara Ehrenreich thing (“Nickel and Dimed”), he actually lived in the trailer park, named the College Home Mobile Park, for several months, where much of the action takes place. He describes the area as “the part of Milwaukee where poor white folks lived.” Milwaukee at that time was on the list of one of the most segregated cities in the U.S.
He drove some of the renters around the city, looking for new apartments to rent, as they lacked cars or other vehicles. He got to know them, and they came to trust him. Actually, they, for the most part, were so up to their ears in drama and personal issues that they did not have any time to wish him harm or really figure him out. They knew he was writing a book, and that they were the subjects. They knew that he came from another world. They also had no time to try to figure out inequality. They only knew it for a fact.
Also in the mix of the first 300 pages is the owner of the trailer park. He, like the landlord couple featured, is making a ton of money, and his relationships with his tenants is of interest. They know that he is rich, off their backs, but they seem to wish him no ill will. They respect him for who he is and what he has to do. The owner prides himself on being able to make good money off his tenants, in one of the city’s poorest trailer park. Somewhat frequently, tenants would leave their trailers behind, as they left, one way or the other. The owner would then reclaim them, as “abandoned property,” and be free to rent them to others, which he did.
This owner found himself, as a result of his business, in the top one percent of earner households, knowing that most of his tenants were in the bottom ten percent. He earned roughly $500,000 after all expenses.
Looking back through the book, I can remember the various tenants that have been introduced. Most live in the trailer park, but not all. Some know each other, but not all know each other. Most have kids, which makes the stress of keeping a roof over one’s head more stressful. Most with kids fear losing their kids to Protective Services.
There are several evictions detailed. On the day of the event, the Sheriff would arrive with a gun, as the moving guys pulled up, this all being done by court order. If the tenant was present, the tenant would be given a choice: truck or curb. Truck meant taking the furniture and other goods to a storage place, where the tenant would have to pay monthly for storage, then a good hunk of money to get the stuff out of storage. Per the author, about 70% of those having items sent to storage never get it back. They are not allowed to take some things out, unless they are fully paid up on the storage unit.
At the eviction site, the tenant has he choices of what to have removed and what to be sent to storage, or what is to be left behind. The landlord, then, has the choice of removing or retaining the remaining items. Many times, the tenants would already have left the unit, and would not be there when the eviction was in progress. What they left behind would be salvaged by the landlord or the moving company, or just sent to the dump. No questions asked.
One story told was that of a man who asked the movers to give him a last minute inside his house. Once inside, he shot himself to death.
I told you there were gotchas.
The moving guys could do several moves per day. They could clean out a place within an hour. Again, they would commonly not be on the hook to take everything. The landlord would be involved in those decisions, because, in many cases, she would have already the unit rented to another group. One of the rules of the trade, per one of the moving guys, was to never open the refrigerator. You do not want to know what might be inside, or how it smelled.
Many times, after the eviction, the tenants had only a shelter to go to. There, they would try to get themselves together and to start the process of finding their next home. Sometimes, tenants would meet other tenants there in the shelter and decide to combine incomes in their search for a new place to rent.
At that time, in Milwaukee, there was a dwindling supply of very low-cost rentals, so tenants might have to make up to 100 calls and look at dozens of units before finding their next home. Landlords always asked about prior evictions, but sometimes chose to ignore these. Sometimes the tenants just plain got lucky. But, most of the time, the group featured in the book would find a way to face eviction again.
There are also many stories about how tenants needing money would lean on friends or family. But they could not always go after the same persons. And, at times, they decided they would rather be evicted that beg for money, again. In one case, a woman decided to be evicted, rather than sell her jewelry, even though she knew that would raise enough money to avoid eviction. And then there were always the stalling techniques, like that money was coming soon to enable the tenant to pay the rent, even when that was not true.
There is also the story of how neighbors might bring lawn chairs out to witness the eviction, to not miss the details of the event. And after an eviction at the trailer park, it was common for other tenants to go to the then-vacant unit to scavenge what was left.
To the credit of the landlord couple in the book, they had no interest, for the most part, in evicting anyone. They would come for their rent, in person, so they got to know their tenants well. They would accept partial payments, at times, hear the hardship stories, but remain firm, like a parent to a child, in warning the tenants of their fate, if they screwed up or got too far behind in rent.
Evictions commonly resulted following police calls and/or incidents with other tenants. Many of the rental sites had multiple units. If one tenant caused disturbances with another, one had to go. If there were too many police calls, or if city inspectors found the unit to be uninhabitable, due to conditions caused by the tenants, they probably had to go.
At the same time, the landlords in the story had their flaws. They were not always quick to respond to complaints, a common one being of water not draining. In some cases, this was due to old pipes; in other cases, the plumber would blame the stoppage on grease or other food debris being poured down a sink. Sometimes there would be no hot water. But the landlord couple had money, and they frequently took trips, like to Jamaica. They would be out of town. They also liked to gamble, to spend money. Like I said above, they were good at what they did. They liked to think that they had the right to enjoy the profits.
In some cases, it was disclosed that the landlord would move ahead with an eviction, knowing that she may be on the brink of selling the property, and wanting the current tenants out, before she sold. One property had a huge fire. The landlord simply used the fire-insurance money to buy another place.
Landlords hate code violations and city inspectors. They cost landlords money. And tenants know that they risk an eviction if they call for inspections.
This landlord couple prided themselves on buying rental property that would yield a positive cash flow from the start. In one case, they actually sold a property, at an inflated price, to a tenant, who was under a first-time-buyers’ program. When the new owner defaulted, the landlords bought the place back, at a nice discount.
In the process of an eviction, there is, of course, a court proceeding. In most cases, the tenants do not show up, so the landlord wins by default. And there are other ways to get tenants out, like paying them to leave, or taking off the front door, or sending some goons over to threaten them, if they do not leave on their own.
The name of the evil, successful landlord, who is Black, is Sherrena, which made me think of the evil Cruella De Vil of Disney fame. She sees evictions as a regular part of her business. Her story reveals that she bought her first rental in 1999, when prices were low, refinanced it some years later, to have a down payment for the next rental. Four years later, she owned 46 units. She found the banks more than willing to lend her to buy more and more But, she was always ready to tenants who were having trouble paying their rents that she had “mortgages to pay.”
She and her husband called themselves “inter-city entrepreneurs.”
The book points out that the profession of property managers has exploded over the past 40 years, and that the number of books on the subject was very limited before about 1975, after which it exploded, as well. In line with this, the book follows Sherrena to some property manager association meetings, where she is very active in giving advice to other landlords. She is seen as one of them who they can learn the latest tricks of the trade from.
An interesting historical disclosure in the book is that it was common after WWII for landlords to turn away families with children and to evict when someone was pregnant. The Fair Housing Act in 1968 set many of the rules we now find common, but, per the book, it did not define families with children as a “protected” class.
Also, after WWII, the federal government made homeownership for white families a priority, but not for Blacks. Landlords were quick to discover that profits could be made from rental units in slums. And even today, rental prices may not differ much between “good” areas and “bad” areas. Again, it is the landlords who decide who lives where, as well as what the prices for the rentals in each area should be.
Near the end of the book, the author makes the points that “The home is the wellspring of personhood” and that “The home remains the primary basis for life.” He goes on to say that this is the basis of “civic life.” But low-income families, commonly, move much more frequently than those with higher incomes. This is disruptive in many ways, including that their kids change schools, frequently. One woman featured in the book, with her kids, moved, on average of about once per year for many, many years.
Color is also involved. Black households are the most likely to be evicted, followed by Hispanics. And most who are evicted have children in the household. The author says that much of this is unnecessary. He points out that about 1/3 of renter households receive some form of government financial help; 2/3 do not. And, he says, legal assistance to the poor has been dwindling for at least a decade.
He says, “In theory, you could solve the problem by expanding public housing, tax credits, homeowner initiatives, or developer incentives.” But, he says, each of these have their limitations. He is clearly for reasonable rent controls and reasonable returns on investments for landlords.
The author says that he studies the subject of poverty as a graduate student. He was fascinated on poverty and its relationships to other things. This led him to focus on evictions. He soon moved into the trailer park, where he lived in a trailer without hot water. He could never get the landlord to fix the problem.
He found himself to be a bit of a field worker, one who was constantly overanalyzing things. He found a surprising lack of data or research to help him with the subject of evictions. He found he was needing to come up with such data on his own, by living among those who he could extract the data. He assumes what he learned in Milwaukee is applicable to most other American cities.
In summary, I think that this may prove to be an important book, historically and culturally. It tells many of us a great deal about a subject we do not know much about. I recommend that others read it, as well.
The book is entirely based in Milwaukee but could easily be in any mid-size American city like Cincinnati, Raleigh, or Kansas City. Matthew Desmond, the author, spend years in Milwaukee living the poverty life and shadowing both tenants and landlords, white, black, male, and female. Evicted is mostly real human stories about life below the poverty line and the all-too-common lack of due process for evictions.
This book has many heart-wrenching stories, and there isn’t always a happy ending. On the one hand, I found myself frustrated by peoples’ inability to better their circumstances. On the other hand, I was FURIOUS with the systemic issues and inequalities keeping people from even having a shot at improving their circumstances. It’s a vicious cycle meant to keep people down.
The most crucial information in this book lives at the end in the epilogue and the “About This Project” sections. In these sections, you learn the toll this research took on Desmond. His interviews and shadowing took place in 2007-2008, but this book wasn’t published until 2017. Desmond explains that between his constant audio recording and written observations, he ended up with over 5000 pages of single-spaced notes. That would take anyone ten years to go through and pare down to create a story.
Since this took place during the Great Recession, it makes you wonder how much worse things have gotten around the country since 2008, especially during the last two years in a pandemic. The same types of people Desmond interviewed in Milwaukee live throughout this country and are often in hourly-service jobs or essential jobs without adequate benefits. These people are often caregivers; some caring for adults, some caring for children, and some caring for both.
What struck me in reading this book is the argument Desmond makes for the home being central to breaking negative generational trauma cycles. If you don’t have a stable home as a child (meaning physical location – psychological is a whole separate discussion), it’s nearly impossible to be able to focus on schoolwork. When a child is in survival mode all the time, there’s little space for learning and development, so these children fall behind, drop out of school, and often become parents – and thus, the cycle begins again. These systems and cycles disproportionately affect people of color, highlighting racial inequalities in other systems.
I hope Evicted shines a light on the need for stable housing for all and shapes the political debate. As populations rise and the gap between the extremely wealthy and the rest of us grows, more and more people will experience unstable housing in America. There are some happy moments in Evicted, but not all stories have happy endings – or even resolutions. That said, it’s definitely a book you should read.
Social scientists have written extensively about poverty as an all-encompassing phenomenon, often folding eviction among poverty’s other crushing outcomes. But sociologist Matthew Desmond wondered about eviction, the tenant’s forced removal, in its own right. He followed eight households in 2007 and 2008 as their landlords turned them out, and two landlords struggling to make a living against delinquent payments. The observations he records are chilling. Sadly, they won’t surprise anybody who’s ever risked missing rent.
The households Desmond follows break into two camps: chronically impoverished Black city dwellers, and dead-broke White trailer-park denizens. Most are receiving some form of government poverty protection, in the form of food stamps, disability insurance, or other welfare. These protections, however, have remained frozen at such low levels for decades, while rents have skyrocketed, that after paying the landlord, they often have under $100 for every expense all month, including feeding and clothing their children.
Desmond’s two landlords break likewise, but aren’t in similar straits. Sherrena mainly rents to tenants who are Black like herself, while Tobin governs his White trailer park through low-wage employees, whom he hires on-site. Both are full-time landlords, meaning they make their living by maintaining their properties and collecting rent. If their tenants don’t pay promptly, they can’t cover their own expenses. They sometimes dance as close to penury as their tenants, but not often.
As Desmond tells his subjects’ stories, some important themes quickly arise. Tenants want the dignity and stability which the home brings. Desmond conveys this hunger when they tell their stories in their own words. They want to collect their mail reliably, send their kids to just one school, and where possible, look for work. But they can’t. Once you’ve been evicted, finding another house is nigh-impossible, so looking for safe housing becomes a full-time job.
Permanent insecurity becomes the dominant force in tenants’ lives. Work, family, and community become secondary to finding four walls. Though he tries to avoid too many narrator interjections, Desmond does quote some sociological research to contextualize his observations: researchers have demonstrated that lacking a stable address makes people less likely to engage with their communities. They live life in permanent expectation that they’ll be forcibly uprooted tomorrow. For children especially, this imprinting has lifelong consequences.
Landlords, meanwhile, aren’t necessarily villains. Some, like Sherrena, enter the property business because it’s their ticket to economic stability and growth. Desmond describes Sherrena, a former schoolteacher and welfare recipient, overcoming her own poverty to afford Carribean vacations and expensive date nights with her husband. Unfortunately, the more property she owns, the more her property owns her. Before long, she finds herself enforcing regulations full-time, while denigrating her tenants to preserve her own fragile sanity.
Reading Desmond’s prose, it’s clear he’s desperately trying to remain neutral on the conflict between landlords and evicted tenants. His sympathies, however, patently lie with the tenants. Fear and desperation increase the likelihood that they’ll make catastrophic mistakes and get evicted again. This means they have an adversarial relationship, not only with their landlords, but with other institutions of civic order, especially the police, who enforce property laws. Then the 2007 housing crisis hits.
Something Desmond treads carefully around, but avoids addressing too directly, is: housing cannot be a universal human right, and a lucrative capital investment, simultaneously. Landlords can only profit, and therefore make a living, if housing is valuable, meaning scarce in relation to demand. Given the choice between property rights and human dignity, the system demands that landlords choose property, because if they don’t, they’ll lose their own dignity, too. The system is rigged to protect stuff.
This book began as Desmond’s doctoral dissertation, and that influence remains visible. Though he’s worked to translate his most opaque passages into vernacular English, and has retained his subjects’ coarse language, he sometimes has to explain difficult context, which can mean passages of dense academese. These passages are rare, though. Desmond has mostly crafted a chilling account of how property, or the lack, transforms human value systems. This book is tough reading without feeling convicted.
Through thorough and expansive research, Desmond walks the reader through the lives of these people — their decision making processes, the choices (and non-choices) that led them to where they are, and the laws and loopholes that work against the poorest and most vulnerable members of our society.
To me, Evicted was an extremely worthwhile read, for many reasons. First, I do not read a lot of non-fiction, because the writing is often too clinical to hold my interest. This book though, reads like a novel. Desmond lived with, and visited with many of these families on a daily basis for three years. We come to know them as we would a friend, and he tells their stories in a chronological, plot-like way. I wanted to know what would happen next to each of them– I felt invested in their well-being, and frustrated when I read about their lives’ numerous drawbacks.
Desmond did an excellent job of writing this book from a non-biased view. I personally believe this to be an accomplishment in and of itself; since he witnessed most of the noted events first-hand, I can only imagine how difficult it was to keep his opinion free and clear of his writing. Yet, he managed it and I appreciated that. I despise when an author tells me, either implicitly or explicitly how I am supposed to feel about about an event. In doing this, an author is not only suggesting that his/her thought and opinion is the “right” opinion, but also that I’m not intelligent enough to draw my own conclusions — which is an assumption based in condescension and inaccuracy, and is wholly insulting. Desmond left his own opinion out of his reporting – he recalled these events masterfully – completely and chock full of detail, but without any implied judgement. His writing is powerful, and allows the reader to form their own opinions.
Further, Desmond provides the reader with significant background information regarding the laws around food-stamps, eviction processes, and the inaccessibility of resources for some of our cities’ most impoverished residents. Because he explained these laws and processes in layman’s terms, I was able to understand why a person might make the decisions that they did. I value logic, and when I cannot understand the logic behind one’s decisions, I become frustrated and impatient. For example, one of the women spent much of her food-stamp allocation for the month on lobster tails and lemon meringue pie. For one meal. Normally, I would think, “Now see — this, this here is the problem.” The author understood that his reader would feel this way, and went on to explain just how difficult it is to drive oneself out of grinding poverty. “People lived with so many compounded limitations that it was difficult to imagine the amount of good behavior or self-control that would allow them to lift themselves out of poverty….those at the bottom had little hope of climbing out even if they pinched every penny. So they chose not to. Instead, they tried to survive in color, to season the suffering with pleasure.” This actually made sense to me. I cannot even begin to imagine feeling so low, and with the author’s careful and logical explanation, I realized that until I live it, I shouldn’t judge it.
This brings me to my final point. I admittedly understand little about our nation’s housing laws and the difficulties that are faced by those who live within the throes of urban decay. I know how expensive apartments are (the Boston area has some of the highest rents and mortgages in the country), and how exhausting the housing search can be. However, even at my poorest moments, when my bank account was completely in the red, I was not without my soft resources (successful parents who’d rather not watch their child become homeless or starve, friends with the ability and willingness to help, a graduate level education and the ability to procure a job that would pay me a steady salary). In short – I can’t fathom the struggle.
The people highlighted in this book do not have these soft resources — they are completely on their own. The author surely knew that most of his readers, (with the ability to spend $13.99 on his book for their reading pleasure), might not be able to comprehend the lives and struggles that these people are living — but he made me want to try. I wasn’t left with any anger over the spending or perceived wasting of tax dollars; rather, I finished the book with a confused feeling – a “in what universe does that law make sense?” type of sentiment. I’m sure this was Desmond’s hope for his book, to provide his reader with an eye-opening experience which, at least in my case, was successful.
To read more of my reviews, go to my blog at [...]





