Enjoy Prime FREE for 30 days
Here's what Amazon Prime has to offer:
| Delivery Speed | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Same-Day Delivery (in select cities) | FREE |
| One-Day Delivery | FREE |
| Two-Day Delivery | FREE |
233 m | MONTREAL H3A 2A0
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Human Action: A Treatise on Economics Paperback – March 14 2007
Purchase options and add-ons
In Human Action, Mises starts from the ideas set forth in his Theory and History that all actions and decisions are based on human needs, wants, and desires and continues deeper and further to explain how studying this human action is not only a legitimate science (praxeology) but how that science is based on the foundation of free-market economics.
Mises presents and discusses all existing economic theories and then proceeds to explain how the only sensible, realistic, and feasible theory of economics is one based on how the needs and desires of human beings dictate trends, affect profits and losses, adjust supply and demand, set prices, and otherwise maintain, regulate, and control economic forces.
Ludwig von Mises (1881–1973) was the leading spokesman of the Austrian School of economics throughout most of the twentieth century.
Bettina Bien Greaves is a former resident scholar and trustee of the Foundation for Economic Education and was a senior staff member at FEE from 1951 to 1999.
- ISBN-100865976317
- ISBN-13978-0865976313
- EditionIn Four Volumes ed.
- PublisherLiberty Fund
- Publication dateMarch 14 2007
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions17.15 x 13.97 x 24.13 cm
- Print length1128 pages
Frequently bought together

Popular titles by this author
Product description
Review
Carlos Ortiz de Landazuri
2007
Product details
- Publisher : Liberty Fund; In Four Volumes ed. edition (March 14 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 1128 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0865976317
- ISBN-13 : 978-0865976313
- Item weight : 2.27 kg
- Dimensions : 17.15 x 13.97 x 24.13 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: #168,660 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #257 in Theory Economics
- #288 in Economic Theory (Books)
- #850 in Popular Economics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book is at odds with the current mainstream of academia mainly because of its first principles. Mises sought to understand social orders on the basis of individual human action. The individualistic approach of von Mises puts him at odds with most academics outside of the economics profession. Notions of a collective will or purpose and individual irrationality still have much credibility among sociologists, anthropologists, political scientists, and other academics outside of economics. It is at odds with what many economists do for different reasons. Human action means perceiving ones current condition, imagining a better state of affairs, and acting to attain this state. This he separates from animal reactions or reflexes. The authors own purpose here is to escape determinism and its consequences. Economists who rigidly insist upon casting all economics in systems of mathematical equations do so without realizing that they have accepted a deterministic straightjacket. Other academics tend to be on the same page with Mises, in his rejection of deterministic math modeling. Mainstream economists who criticize Mises on these grounds tend to do so for pathetic reasons having to do with the fallacy of style. One could argue that Mises devoted too much attention to philosophic and methodological issues, but the simplistic assertions of some that math+statistics=science prove only that most economists do not take philosophy of science the least bit seriously. Mises' contribution here is in asserting the importance of deductive reasoning and of non-deterministic methodological individualism in examining all the actions that people make. His approach did impact upon economics. Prior to Mises economics was about material wealth. Now economics is about scarcity, allocation, and rational individual choice generally, not just with respect to material wealth- an idea that comes to us from Mises, through Lionel Robbins.
The main contributions of Mises on theoretical matters are on economic planning and monetary exchange. Mises launched the interwar debate over socialism in his earlier writings. Human Action integrates this critique of Socialism into a broader system. He contends that the calculation of profit and loss using the common denominator of money makes the rational accumulation and use of capital possible. Mises is examining the problem of using scarce resources across time periods here, and points to the indispensable role that private exchange relations play in enabling people to take advantage of social division of labor. This is a problem of mass coordination and therefore one of how to deal with the division of knowledge that is inherent to mass exchange and division of labor. The principle problem with this critique is in its presentation. While Mises is more clear than many other economists, who present their ideas in mathematical forms that few can decode, but his writing style is often opaque. He also arrives at many conclusions without spelling out his supporting arguments adequately. One must read Carl Menger first to understand Human Action, for what Mises wrote builds out of Menger without making critical details of Menger explicit. One should also note that modern game theoretic models are largely an attempt to deal with the issues that Mises, unlike his contemporary economists, saw as relevant.
Mises also explains trade cycles as a problem of dis-coordination stemming from distorted interest rates. Objections to this argument range from triviality to internal inconsistency. Some say that Mises is assuming systematic irrationality in arguing that investors always get fooled by the actions of central banks. These objections tend to underestimate the extent of the coordination problems that exist in getting a system of worldwide exchange to solve the temporal problems of resource use at all. The idea that other factors, like wage rigidity, are more important than interest rates in explaining recessions and depressions is more plausible. Here one could say that Mises erred in insisting upon deductive rather than inductive reasoning. However, we must remember that Mises did face serious challenges from irrationalists who rejected deductive reasoning, and even the universal legitimacy of any theoretical propositions- even those based on inductive reasoning. His stalwart defense of deductive reasoning, and reason in general, was fully warranted.
Human Action wanders through many other issues- polylogism and reason, interventionism and cooperation, feudalism and equality before the law, progress and warfare. Human Action rivals The Wealth of Nations as an intellectual construct, but contains huge advances beyond Smith's treatise, especially with value theory. These advances also put Mises ahead of his contemporaries. Mises saw critical failings in socialism at a time when most saw it as workable, of not the wave of the future. Mises saw the failings of Keynes' theory of deficient demand and chaos in capital markets- failings that mainstream economists have now acknowledged. Mises saw how critical the issues of time, coordination, and information are to understanding society. The Scholar's edition enables us to see all of this as in the first edition. Economists are gradually addressing these issues. Human Action was revolutionary as a systematic treatise. It challenged many widely held views, and has now become a classic statement of both process orientated non deterministic economic theory and libertarian political values. Human Action is mandatory reading for anyone who takes political economy and the history of economic thought seriously.
1. He expresses himself in direct and to the point language; when speaking of syndicalism, "in short, it is nonsense."
2. He writes about things that are terribly important, today and always, yet not so easy to understand.
3. He can't help but judge nonsensical ideas on the merits. No half-measures here. Don't expect him to go easy on your favorite ideology.
4. He expresses himself in old-fashioned language ("men" instead of "persons" or "people" or...) and uses expressions that no sane author would use today ("the white man") And he says what he thinks: Western society is superior to Eastern society because...
5. He sneaks in little quotations in Latin and Greek here and there and uses words not in some dictionaries. (Look up at least 'autarky,' 'praxeology,' 'catallactics,' 'epigone,' 'apodictic' before reading this book.)
In short, very few people today will ever read "Human Action." I am sure there are people that will refuse to read it because von Mises calls homosexuality a "perversion" (why he says that, I don't know, but it has no effect on the economic arguments) And that's too bad. Very much too bad.
Mises clearly strongly believes he's right. It certainly colors his writing. But try as you may, you won't find it coloring his reasoning. His personal opinions on economic matters are clearly the *product* of his reasoning, not the other way around.
There are a lot of people that believe that government intervention is necessary for a healthy economy. If you are one of them, you have to read this book. Once you have read and understood Mises's arguments, if you still believe that the government has any constructive role to play by "fixing" things wrong in the economy, I want to hear about it. (F. A. Hayek, of all people, once believed in socialism, too. Until he read Mises's "Socialism.")
Mises's argument goes like this:
First, capitalism clearly works. The more capitalistic a country is, the wealthier it is---you could even say, the more capitalistic a country is, the wealthier its *poor* are.
Secondly, socialism worked in small, self-sufficient medieval households, but it can't possibly work in a large industrial society. Why? Because the planners can't plan adequately without the help of a marketplace to set prices.
Thirdly and lastly---and this is the nail in the coffin for the wannabe socialists that get their opinions splattered all over the newspapers---any "in between" attempt at combining socialistic ideals with a capitalistic society must inevitably fail. Why? Because any interference with the market has the opposite effects to what the interferers themselves wanted!
(Fiasco policies that fall into this category are rent control, minimum wages, overtime rules, compulsory insurances of different kinds, Keynesian printing of money, etc. etc.---in short, almost every measure that "progressive" politicians use to "help" us.)
Mises is famous for having started the "socialist calculation debate," and there's even a book about it out there now. Critics of Mises's position in the calculation debate *must* read "Human Action." The basic point that Mises makes here---and he never makes it entirely explicitly---is that prices are ephemeral one-time phenomena that are controlled by buyers and sellers (their "human action"); prices are historical data, past information; prices do not control people, they are controlled by people. It's utterly impossible to predict the future price of any good better than that of any other good. The reason is that we don't know today what people will want tomorrow. The idea of a "demand curve" is just an abstraction useful for teaching the simplest principles of supply and demand to college students. Once you understand this simple but subtle point, Mises's position becomes clear. The planners can't plan, not because they can't calculate today's prices in order to satisfy today's demands, but because they can't figure out how to rig the prices so as to meet the consumers of today and those of ten years from now and everybody inbetween! The same idea of the unpredictability of prices applies to Mises's argument that macroeconomic indicators (such as the CPI) are totally useless: either they tell you nothing at all, or else they tell you what's completely obvious. Using the CPI to answer the question "has Sam's purchasing power increased over the last year" is a bit like trying to answer the question "is it hot in Los Angeles" by referring to the average temperature in the United States.
In short, this book collects a remarkable set of truly amazing insights. Everyone that can handle it should---must!---read it, and read it carefully. I hope history remembers this book, because yes, it may one day, when everyone understands its contents, be considered one of the most important of the 20th century. If civilization survives that long, that is.
Top reviews from other countries
O PRODUTO APESAR DE NÃO SER O ANUNCIADO , É BRILHANTE !!!
Special note:There are some examples where von Mises used examples that could be considered ethnic derogatory.Some people were so good at doing something,everybody went to them to get it done.This could be broken down on an ethnic basis for that reason alone.Can you imagine what he would of said if he was alive when Tata bought Jaguar from Ford?His use of the term "actor" is even more interesting.An economic actor is somebody that might buy or sell but are we really getting into his or her underlying characteristics?Probably not.The intent is to make a profit.They will act accordingly regardless of success or failure.








