Buy new: $11.00
233 m | MONTREAL H3A 2A0
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Create Dangerously: The Power and Responsibility of the Artist Paperback – Oct. 29 2019
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
- Kindle Edition
$8.99 Read with our free app - Paperback
$11.0012 Used from $11.99 20 New from $9.19
Purchase options and add-ons
In 1957, Nobel Prize-winning philosopher Albert Camus gave a speech entitled "Create Dangerously." Camus understood the necessity of those making art as a part of civil society. A bold cry for artistic freedom and responsibility, his words today remain as timely as ever. In this new translation, Camus's message, available as a stand-alone little book for the first time, will resonate with a new generation of writers and artists.
- Print length64 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherVintage
- Publication dateOct. 29 2019
- Dimensions11.07 x 0.58 x 15.85 cm
- ISBN-101984897381
- ISBN-13978-1984897381
Frequently bought together

Popular titles by this author
But You Did Not Come BackM LORIDAN-IVENSPaperback$9.89 shippingGet it Dec 1 - 22Only 1 left in stock.
Product description
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The most important honest response possible is this: it does, in fact, sometimes happen that art is a deceitful luxury. As we well know, we can, anywhere and forever, admire the constellations from the rear deck of the galley while the slaves in the hold keep rowing, growing more and more exhausted; we can always hear the worldly conversations taking place in the seats of the amphitheater while the lion’s teeth tear into his victim. And it is very difficult to object about something in art that has known such great success in the past. Except for this: things have changed somewhat, and, in particular, the number of slaves and martyrs throughout the world has increased tremendously. In the face of such misery, art—if it wishes to continue to be a luxury—must today accept that it is also deceitful.
What would art speak of, in fact? If it were to conform to what the majority of our society asks of it, art would be merely entertaining, without substance. If artists were to blindly reject society, and choose to isolate themselves in their dreams, they would express nothing but negativity. We would thus have only the works of entertainers or experts in the theory of form, which, in both cases, would result in art being cut off from the reality of life. For nearly a century now, we have been living in a society that is not even the society of money (money and gold can arouse human passions); rather, it is a society full of the abstract symbols of money. Consumer society can be defined as a society in which objects disappear and are replaced by symbols. When the ruling class no longer measures its wealth in acres of land or gold bars, but rather by how many digits ideally correspond to a certain number of financial transactions, then that society immediately links itself to a certain kind of trickery at the very heart of its experience and its world. A society based on symbols is, in its essence, an artificial society in which the physical truth of humankind becomes a hoax.
We would then not be at all surprised to learn that such a society had chosen a type of morality based on formal principles, which it then turns into its religion; and such a society would inscribe the words freedom and equality on both its prisons and its hallowed financial institutions. However, these words cannot be prostituted with impunity. The value that is most vilified today is most certainly the value of freedom. Thinking people—I’ve always thought that there are two kinds of intelligence, intelligent intelligence and stupid intelligence—hold as a doctrine that freedom is nothing more than an obstacle on the path to true progress. But such solemn stupidities could only be put forward because for one hundred years, consumer society made an exclusive and unilateral use of freedom, considering it a right rather than an obligation and not fearing to use the principle of freedom to justify actual oppression—and as often as possible. From that point onward, is it truly surprising that such a society wished art to be not an instrument of liberation, but rather an exercise of little importance, simple entertainment? And so, all those high-society people who felt heartbroken over money or had emotional transactions were satisfied, for decades, with novelists who wrote about their world and produced the most useless kind of art imaginable. Oscar Wilde, thinking about himself before he went to prison, spoke of this kind of art, saying that the greatest of all vices was superficiality.
Product details
- Publisher : Vintage (Oct. 29 2019)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 64 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1984897381
- ISBN-13 : 978-1984897381
- Item weight : 59 g
- Dimensions : 11.07 x 0.58 x 15.85 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: #371,651 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #91 in French Literary History & Criticism
- #1,460 in Literary Essays (Books)
- #1,525 in Author Biographies (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Sandra Smith was born and raised in New York City. As an undergraduate, she spent one year studying at the Sorbonne and fell in love with Paris. Immediately after finishing her BA, she was accepted to do a Master's Degree at New York University, in conjunction with the Sorbonne, and so lived in Paris for another year. After completing her MA, she moved to Cambridge, where she began teaching 20th Century French Literature, Modern French Drama and Translation at the University. Soon afterwards, she was accepted to study for a PhD at Clare College, researching the Surrealist Theatre in France between the two World Wars. Sandra Smith taught French Literature and Language at Robinson College, University of Cambridge for many years and has been a guest lecturer and professor at Columbia University, Harvard and Sarah Lawrence College. She currently lives in Minneapolis and teaches for NYU.
Literary/Translation Prizes for 'Suite française':
Winner of the Pen Book of the Month Club Translation Prize (USA) 2006
Winner of the French-American Florence Gould Foundation Translation Prize (USA) 2007
The Quill Award, USA, shortlisted for Book of the Year 2006, General Fiction category. (The only book in translation shortlisted.)
Jewish Quarterly Wingate Literary Prize for Fiction 2006. Shortlisted.
British Book Awards: Border's Book of the Year 2006. Shortlisted.
The Oxford Weidenfeld Prize for French Translation. Shortlisted.
Independent Newspaper Foreign Fiction Prize: only open to living authors, so ineligible, but awarded a 'Special Commendation' by the panel 19 January 2007.
Literary/Translation Prizes for Other Works:
'But You Did Not Come Back' by Marceline Loridan-Ivens, National Jewish Book Award, 2017: Winner
'The Prodigal Child' by Irène Némirovsky, Jewish Book Award, 2022: Finalist
'Inseparable' by Simone de Beauvoir, French-American Florence Gould Foundation Translation Prize 2022: Finalist
Customer reviews
Top reviews from other countries
1. Create Dangerously
2. Defence of Intelligence
3. Bread and Freedom
Nothing more to say about the book, it's got a good font size and production, all for the cheap price of 50 rupees.
Just my book was slightly dirty at the top, but that's the seller's fault.
Reviewed in India on July 25, 2023
1. Create Dangerously
2. Defence of Intelligence
3. Bread and Freedom
Nothing more to say about the book, it's got a good font size and production, all for the cheap price of 50 rupees.
Just my book was slightly dirty at the top, but that's the seller's fault.
The speech “Create Dangerously” is the longest speech in the book and the one I had the most difficulty with. It is simply written and accessible, but I could not understand what the overall theme of it was, nor what the conclusion was. Perhaps my problem is that this is a speech of its time and place. It was delivered a few days after Camus received the Nobel Prize for Literature and twelve years after the end of the Second World War. It may have made more sense at the time to a sophisticated post-Nobel audience in a continent divided into the West and East and in the middle of a cold war. Camus uses the word “art” a lot but mostly he is concerned with art as expressed by the writer in the writer’s writing. He states “To create today is to create dangerously. Any publication is an act, and that act exposes one to the passions of an age that forgives nothing.” (page 3). He thinks that art and artists should not be comfortable: “The freedom of art is not worth much when its only purpose is to assure the artist’s comfort.” (page 31).
The speech “Defence of Intelligence” was a speech given in March 1945, when the Second World War in Europe was almost, but not quite, finished. France had suffered four years of horror and anguish. The French were left with a hatred that Camus said they had to overcome.
The speech “Bread and Freedom” was given in 1953, eight years after the end of the Second World War. Camus says that the worker knows that bread depends, in part, on his freedom. “The society of money and exploitation has never been charged, so far as I know, with assuring the triumph of freedom and justice.” (page 42). “. . . bourgeois society talks about freedom without practising it . . . “ (page 45). The workers’ revolution of 1917 marked the dawn of real freedom but the world’s greatest hope hardened into the world’s most efficient dictatorship. “If someone takes away your bread, he suppresses your freedom at the same time. But if someone takes away your freedom, you may be sure that your bread is threated.” (pages 49/50).
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(1) There are three speeches: Defence of Intelligence, 1945, given to L’Amitié Française (6 pages);
Bread and Freedom, 1953, given at the Labour Exchange of Saint-Étienne (15 pages);
Create Dangerously, 1957, given at University of Uppsala a few days after Camus received the Nobel Prize for Literature (33 pages).
Albert Camus was a French philosopher, author and journalist, famous for his novel The Stranger which reflected some of his absurdism views. He has had several novels published as well as short stories, nonfiction books, plays and essays.
This collection of speeches that discuss art, liberty and responsibility in post-war Europe are exquisitely articulated and provokes plenty of thinking and debating. Having read this during a week where Professor Stephen Hawking passed away, makes me wonder that this is perhaps the philosophical equivalent of Hawking’s A Brief History in Time, but in relation to art and the creator’s motive, obligation and constraints.
Camus discusses what is in the mind of creators, like artists and writers, and their approach to conveying their work, the reason for why they create, and the position it sits in terms of liberty. He moves on from this point in another essay where he speaks about the true meaning of freedom, and the concept that we are, and are not free.
To be honest I struggled with this collection of speeches from Camus. My eyes glazed over plenty sentences which seemed to go on forever, and talk endlessly about a certain meaning or concept. This would be gold dust to an Arts student at a university, but for a reader that is picking it up as a passing interest, it was a difficult read.






