Losse has done a terrific job in her book. She's eloquently spoken about her time at Facebook and provided insights into the earliest periods of the company. Significantly, while the company's mission may have changed (i.e. publicity is seen a a default good, whereas Facebook was initially a more private social network than it's competitor, MySpace) the prevalent misogyny has not. Losse notes throughout how there are different tiers in the company; those with 'technical' backgrounds (i.e. the engineers) and everyone else who happens to be key to the 'social and safe' aspects of the site (i.e. subscriber assistance employees). We also see some of Facebook's internal tools - such as their unified admin password that gave total access to any subscribers' account, systems that precisely track where and when you view other subscribers' pages, and processes and policies to address hate speech - with good commentary on how employees loathed to give up the omniscience and omnipotence over other people's accounts once they possessed such power.
While Zuckerberg himself has a limit role in the book (Losse simply didn't interact much with him until her final years at Facebook), in the final chapters we get some insights into his character, aspirations, and attitude. In total, we get a picture of a 'Boy King' who is interested in flashy jargon while being reliant on others to spell out the broader thinking and philosophies behind the jargon. Tellingly, Losse was asked to (though never did) write a series of essays for Zuckerberg, focusing on topics like "revolutions and giving people power to share," "moving from countries to companies," "everyone becoming developers and how we support that," and "starting Facebook as a small project and a big theory." All these topics were meant to extend and explain his vision of the company: to change the world towards a default-public, freely sharing community and to tear down 'frictions' such as privacy and solitude.
Ultimately, this book is about Losse's own experiences at Facebook, experiences that were coloured by her gender and lack of formal technical engineering. Throughout her book, Losse deploys analytical skills that were developed in Johns Hopkins' MA English program. In large part because of these skills, she gracefully and in jargon-free language reveals a corporate culture that is largely misogynistic, that has developed strong racial overtones, and that features highly masculine and colonial internal languages and attitudes. I'd highly recommend this well written and accessible book: it provides a helpful, and rare, insight into the development and continuance of Facebook's internal culture and how it perceives its role in the world today.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Boy Kings: A Journey into the Heart of the Social Network Hardcover – Bargain Price, June 26 2012
by
Katherine Losse
(Author)
Kate Losse was a grad school refugee when she joined Facebook as employee #51 in 2005. Hired to answer user questions such as “What is a poke?” and “Why can’t I access my ex-girlfriend’s profile?” her early days at the company were characterized by a sense of camaraderie, promise, and ambition: Here was a group of scrappy young upstarts on a mission to rock Silicon Valley and change the world.
Over time, this sense of mission became so intense that working for Facebook felt like more than just a job; it implied a wholehearted dedication to “the cause.” Employees were incentivized to live within one mile of the office, summers were spent carousing at the company pool house, and female employees were told to wear T-shirts with founder Mark Zuckerberg’s profile picture on his birthday. Losse started to wonder what this new medium meant for real-life relationships: Would Facebook improve our social interactions? Or would we all just adapt our behavior to the habits and rules of these brilliant but socially awkward Internet savants who have become today’s youngest power players? Increasingly skeptical, Losse graduated from customer service to the internationalization team—tasked with rolling out Facebook to the rest of the world— finally landing a seat right outside Zuckerberg’s office as his personal ghostwriter, the voice of the boy king.
This book takes us for the first time into the heart of this fast-growing information empire, inviting us to high-level meetings with Zuckerberg; lifting the veil on long nights of relentless hacking and trolling; taking us behind the scenes of raucous company parties; and introducing us to the personalities, values, and secret ambitions of the floppy-haired boy wonders who are redefining the way we live, love, and work. By revealing here what’s really driving both the business and the culture of the social network, Losse answers the biggest question of all: What kind of world is Facebook trying to build, and is it the world we want to live in?
***
“Logging on to Facebook that first day, in retrospect, was the second, and to date the last, time that any technology has captured my imagination. The first was when Apple advertised the first laptop, the PowerBook, in the 1990s—with the words, ‘What’s on your PowerBook?’
“‘World domination,’ my teenaged self- answered instinctively. That’s what these devices were made for, I thought: so small and yet so powerful, so capable of linking quickly to and between everything else in the world. From the laptop, I could write and distribute information faster than ever before. It was intoxicating to imagine, and Facebook’s sudden, faithful rendering in 2004 of the physical world into the virtual felt the same. What could you do, now that you could see and connect to everyone and everything, instantly?
“But what, also, could be diminished by such quick access? In the realm of ideas, it seemed easy: Who wouldn’t want to distribute and discuss ideas widely? However, in the realm of the personal, it seemed more complicated. What was the benefit of doing everything in public? Is information itself neutral, or do different types of information have different values, different levels of expectation of privacy, different implications for distribution and consumption? Should all information be shared equally quickly and without regard to my relationship to it? And, finally, and most important, as we ask whenever we begin a new relationship with anything, would this be good for me?”
-- From the Introduction
Over time, this sense of mission became so intense that working for Facebook felt like more than just a job; it implied a wholehearted dedication to “the cause.” Employees were incentivized to live within one mile of the office, summers were spent carousing at the company pool house, and female employees were told to wear T-shirts with founder Mark Zuckerberg’s profile picture on his birthday. Losse started to wonder what this new medium meant for real-life relationships: Would Facebook improve our social interactions? Or would we all just adapt our behavior to the habits and rules of these brilliant but socially awkward Internet savants who have become today’s youngest power players? Increasingly skeptical, Losse graduated from customer service to the internationalization team—tasked with rolling out Facebook to the rest of the world— finally landing a seat right outside Zuckerberg’s office as his personal ghostwriter, the voice of the boy king.
This book takes us for the first time into the heart of this fast-growing information empire, inviting us to high-level meetings with Zuckerberg; lifting the veil on long nights of relentless hacking and trolling; taking us behind the scenes of raucous company parties; and introducing us to the personalities, values, and secret ambitions of the floppy-haired boy wonders who are redefining the way we live, love, and work. By revealing here what’s really driving both the business and the culture of the social network, Losse answers the biggest question of all: What kind of world is Facebook trying to build, and is it the world we want to live in?
***
“Logging on to Facebook that first day, in retrospect, was the second, and to date the last, time that any technology has captured my imagination. The first was when Apple advertised the first laptop, the PowerBook, in the 1990s—with the words, ‘What’s on your PowerBook?’
“‘World domination,’ my teenaged self- answered instinctively. That’s what these devices were made for, I thought: so small and yet so powerful, so capable of linking quickly to and between everything else in the world. From the laptop, I could write and distribute information faster than ever before. It was intoxicating to imagine, and Facebook’s sudden, faithful rendering in 2004 of the physical world into the virtual felt the same. What could you do, now that you could see and connect to everyone and everything, instantly?
“But what, also, could be diminished by such quick access? In the realm of ideas, it seemed easy: Who wouldn’t want to distribute and discuss ideas widely? However, in the realm of the personal, it seemed more complicated. What was the benefit of doing everything in public? Is information itself neutral, or do different types of information have different values, different levels of expectation of privacy, different implications for distribution and consumption? Should all information be shared equally quickly and without regard to my relationship to it? And, finally, and most important, as we ask whenever we begin a new relationship with anything, would this be good for me?”
-- From the Introduction
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFree Press
- Publication dateJune 26 2012
- Dimensions13.97 x 2.79 x 21.43 cm
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
A People’s History of Computing in the United StatesHardcoverFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it by Sunday, Nov 19
Super Pumped: The Battle for UberHardcoverFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it by Sunday, Nov 19Only 7 left in stock (more on the way).
Product description
Review
“In her dark, hypnotic memoir of working at Facebook during its rising years, Katherine Losse tests Mark Zuckerberg’s dogmatic belief in transparency’s inherent good by removing the privacy controls on his own life. The result is a reluctantly Machiavellian guidebook to Silicon Valley — and a strong endorsement for maintaining a separate social life rather than a fully public “pics or it didn’t happen” one." --The Daily
About the Author
Katherine Losse was born in Phoenix, Arizona, and holds a master’s degree in English from Johns Hopkins University. She lives in Marfa, Texas.
Product details
- ASIN : B00C2IFJJA
- Publisher : Free Press; Reprint edition (June 26 2012)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 256 pages
- Item weight : 363 g
- Dimensions : 13.97 x 2.79 x 21.43 cm
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
96 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from Canada
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in Canada on October 21, 2012
Verified Purchase
Reviewed in Canada on November 15, 2013
Verified Purchase
I really liked the inside look at the growth of Facebook but the writer tried to elevate this into more than that. It's the musings and comparisons of technology to real life seem like unimportant tangents. Still a very interesting read.
Top reviews from other countries
iank
5.0 out of 5 stars
Silicon Valley Culture, through the lens of Facebook
Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2015Verified Purchase
Facebook, as portrayed in Kate Losse's book The Boy Kings is a case study of Silicon Valley culture in the twenty-first century. In many dimensions, Facebook is an impressive achievement that has taken years of engineering work. As I write this, Facebook has a billion users, spread throughout the world. Ms. Losse was involved in the birth of some of Facebook's first overseas networks and was the program manager for the internationalization effort. Facebook has defined social networking and has changed the way many people interact.
Along with its impressive achievements, the Facebook described by Ms. Loose can also be seen as an exemplar of many of the things that are wrong with The Valley.
In 1956 William Whyte wrote a book titled The Organization Man . In Businessweek, David Leonard writes that The Organization Man was "A critique of society as much as business culture, the book diagnosed groupthink--a term Whyte coined--in the suburbs as well as the boardroom, and became one of the century's most influential pieces of commentary." Although Facebook claims that their ethos is "move fast and break things", what they have created in many ways mirrors the corporations of their Grandfather's generation.
Corporations in the 1950s expected conformity and so it is with Facebook and many other Silicon Valley Companies. I once spoke to a start-up that was building a "App" for the Apple iPhone which, they claimed, was going to change the world (an iPhone App, really?) The actual nature of this change is rarely stated but everyone is supposed to buy into the idea that they are doing transformative work.
From the beginning, Mark Zuckerberg has believed that Facebook has a mission that will change the world. The mission of connectedness and "transparency" (where all your information is public). The "mission" is something that employees are supposed to endorse or at least never openly question. At one point in the book Ms. Losse recounts a conversation she had with a manager who said that one of the people in his group didn't "get" the mission and he was going to have to fire her. Facebook employees are expected to be enthusiastic users of Facebook, displaying their curated public personas.
In the 1950s large corporations mostly employed white protestant men. Women were usually secretaries and the idea that a women could run the corporation would have been considered outlandish.
As Ms. Losse describes Facebook, the culture is similarly homogeneous. Almost all of the engineering staff is under 30 and male. Mark Zuckerberg famously said:
"I want to stress the importance of being young and technical," he stated. If you want to found a successful company, you should only hire young people with technical expertise.
"Young people are just smarter," he said with a straight face. "Why are most chess masters under 30?" he asked. "I don't know," he answered. "Young people just have simpler lives. We may not own a car. We may not have family." In the absence of those distractions, he says, you can focus on big ideologies. He added, "I only own a mattress." Later: "Simplicity in life allows you to focus on what's important." [quote from Venture Beat, March 2007]
When Zuckerberg says "focus on what's important", he means focus on "the mission", focus on Facebook. The Organization Man was expected to have a family and a supportive wife - Facebook in Losse's book had dispensed with this. Facebook provided a living allowance so that staff could live near Facebook, all the better to dedicate their waking hours to the Company.
The claim that Silicon Valley is a "meritocracy" where anyone can succeed based on their skills and intelligence is being exposed for its hollowness. Ms. Losse describes in detail what she sees as the gender discrimination of the "Boys" who run Facebook. Facebook doesn't value work outside of engineering and jobs occupied by women at Facebook, like Product Management and customer support are seen as lesser work. The exception to Facebook's engineering stratificaiton seems to be Sheryl Sandberg, who appears to be so brilliant that she's in her own category.
Kate Losse's Facebook is hardly alone in populating engineering with young men. As an exercise, look at the web pages of any number of start-up companies. Many of them have team pictures. Most of these team pictures look so similar that it is difficult to tell them apart. You will see few women and even fewer people over 40 years of age.
Age and gender discrimination are sometimes justified on the basis of "cultural fit". Ms. Losse describes the Facebook engineers as "Boys" who are still riding around on stake boards and going out after work drinking. Most people grow up and leave these things behind. As they mature, their engineering and system design skills mature as well. But this is lost on Ms. Losse's Facebook and most Silicon Valley companies where experience is discounted.
Kate Losse is a good writer and the book is an easy and enjoyable read. Her book is not only an account of The Boy Kings, but also of her journey with Facebook from a small company to a globe spanning social network. She is good at describing some of her inner self. She seems to have a taste for rocker boys. But at Facebook the rocker boys are software engineers. She has a long friendship with an engineer she calls Thrax. In most of her relationships she substitutes the curated intimacy of Facebook for real world intimacy. It is not until the end of the book that she finally has sex with Thrax, although they have danced round it for years.
There are a few strange omissions. Losse starts out as an hourly employee. At some point she must have become more of an official employee with stock options, but it's never clear when this happens.
At another point she mentions to Zuckerberg that Facebook should get a house with a pool. He agrees and they rent a house which the engineers and support staff hang out in. Losse apparently moves into one of the rooms, but she never comments on this arrangement. For example, was she expected to clean up after the engineers who, no doubt, left pizza boxes and beer bottles scattered around? What was it like living in Facebooks early hangout house?
I never got the feeling from reading the book that Losse burns with any particular passion. The closest she comes is her love of travel. But transience is an interlude, not a life. Hopefully Facebook, with its various pathologies, will not be the defining event of her life.
Along with its impressive achievements, the Facebook described by Ms. Loose can also be seen as an exemplar of many of the things that are wrong with The Valley.
In 1956 William Whyte wrote a book titled The Organization Man . In Businessweek, David Leonard writes that The Organization Man was "A critique of society as much as business culture, the book diagnosed groupthink--a term Whyte coined--in the suburbs as well as the boardroom, and became one of the century's most influential pieces of commentary." Although Facebook claims that their ethos is "move fast and break things", what they have created in many ways mirrors the corporations of their Grandfather's generation.
Corporations in the 1950s expected conformity and so it is with Facebook and many other Silicon Valley Companies. I once spoke to a start-up that was building a "App" for the Apple iPhone which, they claimed, was going to change the world (an iPhone App, really?) The actual nature of this change is rarely stated but everyone is supposed to buy into the idea that they are doing transformative work.
From the beginning, Mark Zuckerberg has believed that Facebook has a mission that will change the world. The mission of connectedness and "transparency" (where all your information is public). The "mission" is something that employees are supposed to endorse or at least never openly question. At one point in the book Ms. Losse recounts a conversation she had with a manager who said that one of the people in his group didn't "get" the mission and he was going to have to fire her. Facebook employees are expected to be enthusiastic users of Facebook, displaying their curated public personas.
In the 1950s large corporations mostly employed white protestant men. Women were usually secretaries and the idea that a women could run the corporation would have been considered outlandish.
As Ms. Losse describes Facebook, the culture is similarly homogeneous. Almost all of the engineering staff is under 30 and male. Mark Zuckerberg famously said:
"I want to stress the importance of being young and technical," he stated. If you want to found a successful company, you should only hire young people with technical expertise.
"Young people are just smarter," he said with a straight face. "Why are most chess masters under 30?" he asked. "I don't know," he answered. "Young people just have simpler lives. We may not own a car. We may not have family." In the absence of those distractions, he says, you can focus on big ideologies. He added, "I only own a mattress." Later: "Simplicity in life allows you to focus on what's important." [quote from Venture Beat, March 2007]
When Zuckerberg says "focus on what's important", he means focus on "the mission", focus on Facebook. The Organization Man was expected to have a family and a supportive wife - Facebook in Losse's book had dispensed with this. Facebook provided a living allowance so that staff could live near Facebook, all the better to dedicate their waking hours to the Company.
The claim that Silicon Valley is a "meritocracy" where anyone can succeed based on their skills and intelligence is being exposed for its hollowness. Ms. Losse describes in detail what she sees as the gender discrimination of the "Boys" who run Facebook. Facebook doesn't value work outside of engineering and jobs occupied by women at Facebook, like Product Management and customer support are seen as lesser work. The exception to Facebook's engineering stratificaiton seems to be Sheryl Sandberg, who appears to be so brilliant that she's in her own category.
Kate Losse's Facebook is hardly alone in populating engineering with young men. As an exercise, look at the web pages of any number of start-up companies. Many of them have team pictures. Most of these team pictures look so similar that it is difficult to tell them apart. You will see few women and even fewer people over 40 years of age.
Age and gender discrimination are sometimes justified on the basis of "cultural fit". Ms. Losse describes the Facebook engineers as "Boys" who are still riding around on stake boards and going out after work drinking. Most people grow up and leave these things behind. As they mature, their engineering and system design skills mature as well. But this is lost on Ms. Losse's Facebook and most Silicon Valley companies where experience is discounted.
Kate Losse is a good writer and the book is an easy and enjoyable read. Her book is not only an account of The Boy Kings, but also of her journey with Facebook from a small company to a globe spanning social network. She is good at describing some of her inner self. She seems to have a taste for rocker boys. But at Facebook the rocker boys are software engineers. She has a long friendship with an engineer she calls Thrax. In most of her relationships she substitutes the curated intimacy of Facebook for real world intimacy. It is not until the end of the book that she finally has sex with Thrax, although they have danced round it for years.
There are a few strange omissions. Losse starts out as an hourly employee. At some point she must have become more of an official employee with stock options, but it's never clear when this happens.
At another point she mentions to Zuckerberg that Facebook should get a house with a pool. He agrees and they rent a house which the engineers and support staff hang out in. Losse apparently moves into one of the rooms, but she never comments on this arrangement. For example, was she expected to clean up after the engineers who, no doubt, left pizza boxes and beer bottles scattered around? What was it like living in Facebooks early hangout house?
I never got the feeling from reading the book that Losse burns with any particular passion. The closest she comes is her love of travel. But transience is an interlude, not a life. Hopefully Facebook, with its various pathologies, will not be the defining event of her life.
10 people found this helpful
Report
Circle Compost LLC
4.0 out of 5 stars
Transparency and the End of Privacy
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2016Verified Purchase
"Social graces--and privacy and psychological well-being, for that matter--are just obstacles in the way of having more information." -page 43
"In the end, no matter how much we tried, we couldn't use technology to produce love. Because love, unlike technology and its uses, requires commitment to one, instead of the broadcast and consumption of many bits of distant, digital content. Love doesn't scale." -page 90
"This was always the case with social-media technology: It meant no harm, but that did not mean it would not cause it.... Facebook doesn't hurt people: People hurt people. This is true. But just as Facebook makes it possible to do things faster, more efficiently, more cheaply, it makes it possible to hurt people faster, more efficiently, with less cost to themselves." -page 93
"... perhaps your own perfection is what you would have to believe in if everyone else in the world isn't good enough. And that's why you'd want to reinvent a world in which everything had to appear perfect, all the time, as if forcing everyone else to believe in being perfect, too, or at least try.... I just wanted to be happy and loved for who I was and I wasn't sure all the algorithms or fame in the world could produce that." -page 135
"What I was seeing was that social websites were playing upon the biggest open and unsolved wound in our society: the need to be known, the need to be loved. It was unclear if they were meeting this need." -page 139
"I was getting paid to go on a trip around the world, first class. 'That's a nice gig,' my dad said after I told him I'd be out of the country for a month. 'Yes, it is,' I concurred, relieved and excited." -page 157
"Everyone wanted to see everything. This was all justified under the company's corporate buzzword, transparency, though no one seemed to know exactly what it meant. The fact that it was hard to define led Mark [Zuckerberg] to begin a discussion on the company's internal discussion page asking everyone to submit ideas for what transparency was. For some, like Mark, who posted in the thread with everyone else, the word transparency seemed to ring of enforced integrity, as if in a transparent world there could be no lies, no hidden information, and that nothing bad could happen because everyone knew everything about everyone." -page 174
The first five quotes above show some of Kate Losse's thoughts on emotional implications as they related to Facebook's corporate goals during her first two years working at the company. The limitations of social media in fulfilling people's emotional needs were often on her mind as was the emotional damage people could cause, very quickly, via social media posts and comments.
The sixth quote above simply relates that Losse traveled overseas for Facebook for a month at a time, similar to Annie in Dave Eggers' The Circle. Losse is more like Annie than Mae (The Circle's main character) in that she tows the corporate line for her social media company, travels overseas doing work to grow her company's global presence before eventually burning out (though in a different, less dramatic way than Annie).
The final quote above draws the closest parallel between this book and The Circle: the specific use of the term "transparency" in Facebook's internal discussions as described by Losse, just as Eggers makes "transparency" an actual program initiated at The Circle in which people wear body cameras and broadcast their lives 24/7.
Either Eggers actually did read Losse's book and borrowed heavily from it in his fiction, or their are uncanny similarities between what Eggers dreamed up for The Circle and the way Losse described her actual experiences at Facebook. Either way, as I wrote in my review of The Circle, the question of just how much of their personal lives people should share on social media is significant and will only grow in significance as technology continues to improve.
Facebook Live now advertises on television. At the moment, people can go Live on Facebook by filming with their smartphones or ipad or similar device, but who's to say we won't very, very soon live in a world where tiny, low cost, unnoticeable cameras can be planted by anyone, anywhere, to show us their surroundings at any given time, live? A world where anyone could be on camera at any moment without his or her knowledge, a world in which there's nobody to whom a person can complain about being on camera without his or her knowledge because the right for all to see that film footage outweighs the right for anyone to choose not to be filmed.
Here's the last sentence from that last quote above, again: "For some, like Mark [Zuckerberg], who posted in the thread with everyone else, the word transparency seemed to ring of enforced integrity, as if in a transparent world there could be no lies, no hidden information, and that nothing bad could happen because everyone knew everything about everyone."
If the above quoted sentence, in light of Facebook's approximately $350 billion market valuation (at the time of this review) and Zuckerberg's own extreme wealth and influence, does not have the potential to end privacy, to create a world where, as Margaret Atwood wrote in her review of The Circle for The New York Review of Books, "Privacy is Theft," I can't imagine what does.
"In the end, no matter how much we tried, we couldn't use technology to produce love. Because love, unlike technology and its uses, requires commitment to one, instead of the broadcast and consumption of many bits of distant, digital content. Love doesn't scale." -page 90
"This was always the case with social-media technology: It meant no harm, but that did not mean it would not cause it.... Facebook doesn't hurt people: People hurt people. This is true. But just as Facebook makes it possible to do things faster, more efficiently, more cheaply, it makes it possible to hurt people faster, more efficiently, with less cost to themselves." -page 93
"... perhaps your own perfection is what you would have to believe in if everyone else in the world isn't good enough. And that's why you'd want to reinvent a world in which everything had to appear perfect, all the time, as if forcing everyone else to believe in being perfect, too, or at least try.... I just wanted to be happy and loved for who I was and I wasn't sure all the algorithms or fame in the world could produce that." -page 135
"What I was seeing was that social websites were playing upon the biggest open and unsolved wound in our society: the need to be known, the need to be loved. It was unclear if they were meeting this need." -page 139
"I was getting paid to go on a trip around the world, first class. 'That's a nice gig,' my dad said after I told him I'd be out of the country for a month. 'Yes, it is,' I concurred, relieved and excited." -page 157
"Everyone wanted to see everything. This was all justified under the company's corporate buzzword, transparency, though no one seemed to know exactly what it meant. The fact that it was hard to define led Mark [Zuckerberg] to begin a discussion on the company's internal discussion page asking everyone to submit ideas for what transparency was. For some, like Mark, who posted in the thread with everyone else, the word transparency seemed to ring of enforced integrity, as if in a transparent world there could be no lies, no hidden information, and that nothing bad could happen because everyone knew everything about everyone." -page 174
The first five quotes above show some of Kate Losse's thoughts on emotional implications as they related to Facebook's corporate goals during her first two years working at the company. The limitations of social media in fulfilling people's emotional needs were often on her mind as was the emotional damage people could cause, very quickly, via social media posts and comments.
The sixth quote above simply relates that Losse traveled overseas for Facebook for a month at a time, similar to Annie in Dave Eggers' The Circle. Losse is more like Annie than Mae (The Circle's main character) in that she tows the corporate line for her social media company, travels overseas doing work to grow her company's global presence before eventually burning out (though in a different, less dramatic way than Annie).
The final quote above draws the closest parallel between this book and The Circle: the specific use of the term "transparency" in Facebook's internal discussions as described by Losse, just as Eggers makes "transparency" an actual program initiated at The Circle in which people wear body cameras and broadcast their lives 24/7.
Either Eggers actually did read Losse's book and borrowed heavily from it in his fiction, or their are uncanny similarities between what Eggers dreamed up for The Circle and the way Losse described her actual experiences at Facebook. Either way, as I wrote in my review of The Circle, the question of just how much of their personal lives people should share on social media is significant and will only grow in significance as technology continues to improve.
Facebook Live now advertises on television. At the moment, people can go Live on Facebook by filming with their smartphones or ipad or similar device, but who's to say we won't very, very soon live in a world where tiny, low cost, unnoticeable cameras can be planted by anyone, anywhere, to show us their surroundings at any given time, live? A world where anyone could be on camera at any moment without his or her knowledge, a world in which there's nobody to whom a person can complain about being on camera without his or her knowledge because the right for all to see that film footage outweighs the right for anyone to choose not to be filmed.
Here's the last sentence from that last quote above, again: "For some, like Mark [Zuckerberg], who posted in the thread with everyone else, the word transparency seemed to ring of enforced integrity, as if in a transparent world there could be no lies, no hidden information, and that nothing bad could happen because everyone knew everything about everyone."
If the above quoted sentence, in light of Facebook's approximately $350 billion market valuation (at the time of this review) and Zuckerberg's own extreme wealth and influence, does not have the potential to end privacy, to create a world where, as Margaret Atwood wrote in her review of The Circle for The New York Review of Books, "Privacy is Theft," I can't imagine what does.
8 people found this helpful
Report
Ken M. Haggerty
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Important Book * The True, Undramatized & Insightful Story Of Facebook
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2013Verified Purchase
I devoured this book a single day, it was that good :-)
It is hard for any of us who live outside the Bay Area to comprehend fully just what it means to "work at Google" or "work at Facebook" or any of the myriad tech companies who have made Silicon Valley-and now, San Francisco-their home. Ms. Losse's phenomenal book gives us *the* honest, human, ground-floor perspective of Silicon Valley culture as told through her own experience at Facebook, rising from low-level, non-technical employee to Mark Zuckerberg's personal ghostwriter.
This isn't some Sorkinized popcorn drama. This is the real deal.
/The Boy Kings/ is a story that needs to be told, that demands to be read and discussed and shared, and Ms. Losse's excellent prose (inspired by Joan Didion, but with less angst) will tell it to you without making you feel like an outsider. Ms. Losse's criticisms of "brogramming" culture are spot-on, but the book is more importantly about identity politics and how "brogramming" culture gives power to venture capitalists' favored stock (male, skinny, mostly-white baby-faced dropouts with technical backgrounds) and withholds it from everyone else-especially women, non-technical employees, and users of Facebook.
The book, and Ms. Losse by extension, is smart enough not to fall into black-and-white truisms, moralizations, or demonizations. The "characters" are real and the issues complicated by the fact that they are. Ms. Losse humanizes them through a compelling narrative that's quick to read and full of memorable moments, and while many of the revelations in /The Boy Kings/ may be familiar to close followers of Facebook and Silicon Valley, the book puts these moments into context and opens them up to a wider audience. In particular, Ms. Losse's own achievements through the ranks at Facebook-and more importantly, her strength and courage to criticize what needs to be criticized-is the real /Lean In/, not Sheryl Sandberg.
It is hard for any of us who live outside the Bay Area to comprehend fully just what it means to "work at Google" or "work at Facebook" or any of the myriad tech companies who have made Silicon Valley-and now, San Francisco-their home. Ms. Losse's phenomenal book gives us *the* honest, human, ground-floor perspective of Silicon Valley culture as told through her own experience at Facebook, rising from low-level, non-technical employee to Mark Zuckerberg's personal ghostwriter.
This isn't some Sorkinized popcorn drama. This is the real deal.
/The Boy Kings/ is a story that needs to be told, that demands to be read and discussed and shared, and Ms. Losse's excellent prose (inspired by Joan Didion, but with less angst) will tell it to you without making you feel like an outsider. Ms. Losse's criticisms of "brogramming" culture are spot-on, but the book is more importantly about identity politics and how "brogramming" culture gives power to venture capitalists' favored stock (male, skinny, mostly-white baby-faced dropouts with technical backgrounds) and withholds it from everyone else-especially women, non-technical employees, and users of Facebook.
The book, and Ms. Losse by extension, is smart enough not to fall into black-and-white truisms, moralizations, or demonizations. The "characters" are real and the issues complicated by the fact that they are. Ms. Losse humanizes them through a compelling narrative that's quick to read and full of memorable moments, and while many of the revelations in /The Boy Kings/ may be familiar to close followers of Facebook and Silicon Valley, the book puts these moments into context and opens them up to a wider audience. In particular, Ms. Losse's own achievements through the ranks at Facebook-and more importantly, her strength and courage to criticize what needs to be criticized-is the real /Lean In/, not Sheryl Sandberg.
6 people found this helpful
Report
Jason McFadden
4.0 out of 5 stars
Insightful, Fascinating, Thought Provoking
Reviewed in the United States on August 12, 2012Verified Purchase
I read through this in a day span on my Kindle. I recommend it if any of the following apply:
-You enjoyed the movie "The Social Network"
-You are interested or intrigued by the hacking subculture
-You have ever questioned your online identity/privacy/security
-You have a love/have relationship with Facebook
-You are interested in individuals' accounts online of how/why they left Facebook
-You are concerned about Facebook owning your data or your identity
-You wonder about the future of Facebook or your own internet usage
-You enjoyed Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs (thus how the tech industry started/continues around Palo Alto)
I enjoyed this book. I was a little biased towards the author because of something we have in common: despite our involvement with technology, we love the open desert Southwest.
The movie, "The Social Network", shows how Facebook started, and this book, not intentionally I think, shows how it grew from that point on. Very interesting.
The general questions about how Technology/Internet/Social Media/Facebook influences our digital and analog lives are raised throughout this book, and the answers are important for both society in general and individuals. It leaves you to decide for yourself what those answers are.
A big concern is the basic common question about users online privacy and how willing are people to be "open" or "transparent" and if people have considered the costs of that. Many people get so caught up in the fast forward pace of digital technology and trends that the proverbial statement can be said,
People are so busy to see if they could, they never stopped to ask if they should.
-You enjoyed the movie "The Social Network"
-You are interested or intrigued by the hacking subculture
-You have ever questioned your online identity/privacy/security
-You have a love/have relationship with Facebook
-You are interested in individuals' accounts online of how/why they left Facebook
-You are concerned about Facebook owning your data or your identity
-You wonder about the future of Facebook or your own internet usage
-You enjoyed Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs (thus how the tech industry started/continues around Palo Alto)
I enjoyed this book. I was a little biased towards the author because of something we have in common: despite our involvement with technology, we love the open desert Southwest.
The movie, "The Social Network", shows how Facebook started, and this book, not intentionally I think, shows how it grew from that point on. Very interesting.
The general questions about how Technology/Internet/Social Media/Facebook influences our digital and analog lives are raised throughout this book, and the answers are important for both society in general and individuals. It leaves you to decide for yourself what those answers are.
A big concern is the basic common question about users online privacy and how willing are people to be "open" or "transparent" and if people have considered the costs of that. Many people get so caught up in the fast forward pace of digital technology and trends that the proverbial statement can be said,
People are so busy to see if they could, they never stopped to ask if they should.
3 people found this helpful
Report
Nicki Escudero
5.0 out of 5 stars
A must-read for Facebook users
Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2013Verified Purchase
If you use social media at all, you should read The Boy Kings. Not because you'll learn intriguing examples of how socially backward Facebook was in the early days, and not just because you'll get a peek at what founder Mark Zuckerberg is like behind closed doors. The bigger meaning of the book is to make readers question their relationships with social media and how technologies such as Facebook affect personal interactions.
Author Katherine Losse is actually a Phoenix native. She holds a master's degree in English from John Hopkins University and became employee number 51 at Facebook as a customer support representative. Her book tells the story of her journey from a grad school student to working her way on up in Facebook as part of the internationalization team, then as Zuckerberg's ghostwriter, through to her eventual departure from the company. Peppered in-between tales from the office are vignettes about what it was like to party with Zuckerberg and crew, as well as insight into what kinds of people helped shape the world's largest social network.
Losse's intellectualism shines through in her writing, as she adds rich detail to the people and events mentioned. The Boy Kings isn't simply a memoir -- it reads like a novel, with wonderful character development and engaging action. And the fact that Losse is a huge music fan and integrates her musical tastes into her memories is a bonus for music lovers like me. It was a really fun, yet disturbing, read that I couldn't put down.
I was lucky enough to interview Losse about the themes in the book, which she hopes prompt larger discussions on the role of technology in our lives and whether our reliance on it is beneficial or detrimental.
Author Katherine Losse is actually a Phoenix native. She holds a master's degree in English from John Hopkins University and became employee number 51 at Facebook as a customer support representative. Her book tells the story of her journey from a grad school student to working her way on up in Facebook as part of the internationalization team, then as Zuckerberg's ghostwriter, through to her eventual departure from the company. Peppered in-between tales from the office are vignettes about what it was like to party with Zuckerberg and crew, as well as insight into what kinds of people helped shape the world's largest social network.
Losse's intellectualism shines through in her writing, as she adds rich detail to the people and events mentioned. The Boy Kings isn't simply a memoir -- it reads like a novel, with wonderful character development and engaging action. And the fact that Losse is a huge music fan and integrates her musical tastes into her memories is a bonus for music lovers like me. It was a really fun, yet disturbing, read that I couldn't put down.
I was lucky enough to interview Losse about the themes in the book, which she hopes prompt larger discussions on the role of technology in our lives and whether our reliance on it is beneficial or detrimental.
3 people found this helpful
Report



