Top critical review
on March 19, 2001
Why do they have to do it? OK, I admit, "City Slickers" was great, but why do they have to try to capitalize on the success of a fist novie and make these sequels. And why do you, yes YOU the people who go and see them and rate them so highly, give them the encouragement. Witht he exception of the "Star wars" trilogy and "Indiana Jones" trilogy sequels never fail to disappoint! This is the same old garbage withthe same old gags. "He's behind me isn't he?" Phil nods "Yes!" with a vacant and stupid grin on his ugly mug. Oh please. We haven't heard THAT one before have we? That was incedibly annoying! Even moreso when we are expected to laugh at it! "City Slickers" was a self-contained movie. It didn't need a sequel. So why do it?